Implantation and 30-Day Follow-Up on All 4 Valve Sizes Within the Portico Transcatheter Aortic Bioprosthetic Family

Standard

Implantation and 30-Day Follow-Up on All 4 Valve Sizes Within the Portico Transcatheter Aortic Bioprosthetic Family. / Möllmann, Helge; Linke, Axel; Holzhey, David M; Walther, Thomas; Manoharan, Ganesh; Schäfer, Ulrich; Heinz-Kuck, Karl; Van Boven, Ad J; Redwood, Simon R; Kovac, Jan; Butter, Christian; Søndergaard, Lars; Lauten, Alexander; Schymik, Gerhard; Worthley, Stephen G.

In: JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE, Vol. 10, No. 15, 14.08.2017, p. 1538-1547.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Möllmann, H, Linke, A, Holzhey, DM, Walther, T, Manoharan, G, Schäfer, U, Heinz-Kuck, K, Van Boven, AJ, Redwood, SR, Kovac, J, Butter, C, Søndergaard, L, Lauten, A, Schymik, G & Worthley, SG 2017, 'Implantation and 30-Day Follow-Up on All 4 Valve Sizes Within the Portico Transcatheter Aortic Bioprosthetic Family', JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE, vol. 10, no. 15, pp. 1538-1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.021

APA

Möllmann, H., Linke, A., Holzhey, D. M., Walther, T., Manoharan, G., Schäfer, U., Heinz-Kuck, K., Van Boven, A. J., Redwood, S. R., Kovac, J., Butter, C., Søndergaard, L., Lauten, A., Schymik, G., & Worthley, S. G. (2017). Implantation and 30-Day Follow-Up on All 4 Valve Sizes Within the Portico Transcatheter Aortic Bioprosthetic Family. JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE, 10(15), 1538-1547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.021

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{a1faf18739f147708bb315bfecb9f22f,
title = "Implantation and 30-Day Follow-Up on All 4 Valve Sizes Within the Portico Transcatheter Aortic Bioprosthetic Family",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term safety and performance of the full range of valve sizes offered within the Portico transcatheter aortic valve replacement system.BACKGROUND: The Portico transcatheter aortic heart valve is a fully resheathable, repositionable, and self-expanding bioprosthesis designed to achieve optimal valve position and hemodynamic performance and limit conduction disturbances.METHODS: Patients (n = 222) with symptomatic (New York Heart Association functional class ≥II) severe aortic stenosis considered by a multidisciplinary heart team to be at high surgical risk were recruited between December 2011 and September 2015 in this prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study. Patients were implanted with the full range of Portico heart valves (23, 25, 27, and 29 mm) using the transfemoral approach. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included valve performance, improvement in functional class, and procedural outcomes as defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria.RESULTS: A total of 220 patients (mean age 83.0 ± 4.6 years, 74.3% women, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 5.8%) had valves implanted. All resheathing and repositioning attempts (n = 72) were successful. At 30 days, all-cause mortality was 3.6%. Procedural outcomes included disabling (major) stroke (3.2%), major vascular complications (7.2%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (13.5%). Compared with baseline, 75.8% of patients improved by ≥1 New York Heart Association functional class at 30 days. The rate of moderate paravalvular leak was 5.7%, with no severe paravalvular leak reported. No differences in paravalvular leak incidence and severity were observed among valve sizes (p = 0.24).CONCLUSIONS: Across all valve sizes, use of the repositionable Portico transcatheter aortic valve replacement system resulted in safe and effective treatment of aortic stenosis in high-risk patients.",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging, Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging, Australia, Bioprosthesis, Europe, Female, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Hemodynamics, Humans, Male, Postoperative Complications/etiology, Prospective Studies, Prosthesis Design, Recovery of Function, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Helge M{\"o}llmann and Axel Linke and Holzhey, {David M} and Thomas Walther and Ganesh Manoharan and Ulrich Sch{\"a}fer and Karl Heinz-Kuck and {Van Boven}, {Ad J} and Redwood, {Simon R} and Jan Kovac and Christian Butter and Lars S{\o}ndergaard and Alexander Lauten and Gerhard Schymik and Worthley, {Stephen G}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.",
year = "2017",
month = aug,
day = "14",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.021",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1538--1547",
journal = "JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE",
issn = "1936-8798",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "15",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implantation and 30-Day Follow-Up on All 4 Valve Sizes Within the Portico Transcatheter Aortic Bioprosthetic Family

AU - Möllmann, Helge

AU - Linke, Axel

AU - Holzhey, David M

AU - Walther, Thomas

AU - Manoharan, Ganesh

AU - Schäfer, Ulrich

AU - Heinz-Kuck, Karl

AU - Van Boven, Ad J

AU - Redwood, Simon R

AU - Kovac, Jan

AU - Butter, Christian

AU - Søndergaard, Lars

AU - Lauten, Alexander

AU - Schymik, Gerhard

AU - Worthley, Stephen G

N1 - Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

PY - 2017/8/14

Y1 - 2017/8/14

N2 - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term safety and performance of the full range of valve sizes offered within the Portico transcatheter aortic valve replacement system.BACKGROUND: The Portico transcatheter aortic heart valve is a fully resheathable, repositionable, and self-expanding bioprosthesis designed to achieve optimal valve position and hemodynamic performance and limit conduction disturbances.METHODS: Patients (n = 222) with symptomatic (New York Heart Association functional class ≥II) severe aortic stenosis considered by a multidisciplinary heart team to be at high surgical risk were recruited between December 2011 and September 2015 in this prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study. Patients were implanted with the full range of Portico heart valves (23, 25, 27, and 29 mm) using the transfemoral approach. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included valve performance, improvement in functional class, and procedural outcomes as defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria.RESULTS: A total of 220 patients (mean age 83.0 ± 4.6 years, 74.3% women, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 5.8%) had valves implanted. All resheathing and repositioning attempts (n = 72) were successful. At 30 days, all-cause mortality was 3.6%. Procedural outcomes included disabling (major) stroke (3.2%), major vascular complications (7.2%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (13.5%). Compared with baseline, 75.8% of patients improved by ≥1 New York Heart Association functional class at 30 days. The rate of moderate paravalvular leak was 5.7%, with no severe paravalvular leak reported. No differences in paravalvular leak incidence and severity were observed among valve sizes (p = 0.24).CONCLUSIONS: Across all valve sizes, use of the repositionable Portico transcatheter aortic valve replacement system resulted in safe and effective treatment of aortic stenosis in high-risk patients.

AB - OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term safety and performance of the full range of valve sizes offered within the Portico transcatheter aortic valve replacement system.BACKGROUND: The Portico transcatheter aortic heart valve is a fully resheathable, repositionable, and self-expanding bioprosthesis designed to achieve optimal valve position and hemodynamic performance and limit conduction disturbances.METHODS: Patients (n = 222) with symptomatic (New York Heart Association functional class ≥II) severe aortic stenosis considered by a multidisciplinary heart team to be at high surgical risk were recruited between December 2011 and September 2015 in this prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study. Patients were implanted with the full range of Portico heart valves (23, 25, 27, and 29 mm) using the transfemoral approach. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary endpoints included valve performance, improvement in functional class, and procedural outcomes as defined by Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria.RESULTS: A total of 220 patients (mean age 83.0 ± 4.6 years, 74.3% women, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 5.8%) had valves implanted. All resheathing and repositioning attempts (n = 72) were successful. At 30 days, all-cause mortality was 3.6%. Procedural outcomes included disabling (major) stroke (3.2%), major vascular complications (7.2%), and permanent pacemaker implantation (13.5%). Compared with baseline, 75.8% of patients improved by ≥1 New York Heart Association functional class at 30 days. The rate of moderate paravalvular leak was 5.7%, with no severe paravalvular leak reported. No differences in paravalvular leak incidence and severity were observed among valve sizes (p = 0.24).CONCLUSIONS: Across all valve sizes, use of the repositionable Portico transcatheter aortic valve replacement system resulted in safe and effective treatment of aortic stenosis in high-risk patients.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging

KW - Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging

KW - Australia

KW - Bioprosthesis

KW - Europe

KW - Female

KW - Heart Valve Prosthesis

KW - Hemodynamics

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Postoperative Complications/etiology

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Recovery of Function

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Severity of Illness Index

KW - Time Factors

KW - Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.021

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 28797431

VL - 10

SP - 1538

EP - 1547

JO - JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE

JF - JACC-CARDIOVASC INTE

SN - 1936-8798

IS - 15

ER -