Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement for Cervical Radiculopathy

Standard

Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement for Cervical Radiculopathy. / Mai, Eric; Kim, Eric; Kaidi, Austin; Subramanian, Tejas; Simon, Chad Z; Asada, Tomoyuki; Kwas, Cole; Zhang, Joshua; Araghi, Kasra; Singh, Nishtha; Tuma, Olivia; Korsun, Maximilian; Allen, Myles; Heuer, Annika; Sheha, Evan D; Dowdell, James; Huang, Russel C; Albert, Todd J; Qureshi, Sheeraz A; Iyer, Sravisht.

In: SPINE, Vol. 49, No. 18, 15.09.2024, p. 1251-1258.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Mai, E, Kim, E, Kaidi, A, Subramanian, T, Simon, CZ, Asada, T, Kwas, C, Zhang, J, Araghi, K, Singh, N, Tuma, O, Korsun, M, Allen, M, Heuer, A, Sheha, ED, Dowdell, J, Huang, RC, Albert, TJ, Qureshi, SA & Iyer, S 2024, 'Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement for Cervical Radiculopathy', SPINE, vol. 49, no. 18, pp. 1251-1258. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005020

APA

Mai, E., Kim, E., Kaidi, A., Subramanian, T., Simon, C. Z., Asada, T., Kwas, C., Zhang, J., Araghi, K., Singh, N., Tuma, O., Korsun, M., Allen, M., Heuer, A., Sheha, E. D., Dowdell, J., Huang, R. C., Albert, T. J., Qureshi, S. A., & Iyer, S. (2024). Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement for Cervical Radiculopathy. SPINE, 49(18), 1251-1258. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005020

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{2d49b775cf244504ace5847029c01211,
title = "Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement for Cervical Radiculopathy",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of preoperative symptom duration on postoperative functional outcomes after cervical disc replacement (CDR) for radiculopathy.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CDR has emerged as a reliable and efficacious treatment option for degenerative cervical spine pathologies. The relationship between preoperative symptom duration and outcomes after CDR is not well established.METHODS: Patients with radiculopathy without myelopathy who underwent primary 1- or 2-level CDRs were included and divided into shorter (<6 mo) and prolonged (≥6 mo) cohorts based on preoperative symptom duration. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included neck disability index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm. Changes in PROM scores and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) rates were calculated. Analyses were conducted on the early (within 3 mo) and late (6 mo-2 y) postoperative periods.RESULTS: A total of 201 patients (43.6±8.7 y, 33.3% female) were included. In both early and late postoperative periods, the shorter preoperative symptom duration cohort experienced significantly greater change from preoperative PROM scores compared with the prolonged symptom duration cohort for NDI, VAS-Neck, and VAS-Arm. The shorter symptom duration cohort achieved MCID in the early postoperative period at a significantly higher rate for NDI (78.9% vs. 54.9%, P =0.001), VAS-Neck (87.0% vs. 56.0%, P <0.001), and VAS-Arm (90.5% vs. 70.7%, P =0.002). Prolonged preoperative symptom duration (≥6 mo) was identified as an independent risk factor for failure to achieve MCID at the latest timepoint for NDI (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2-6.9, P =0.016), VAS-Neck (OR: 9.8, 95% CI: 3.7-26.0, P <0.001), and VAS-Arm (OR: 7.5, 95% CI: 2.5-22.5, P <0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates improved patient-reported outcomes for those with shorter preoperative symptom duration undergoing CDR for radiculopathy, suggesting delayed surgical intervention may result in poorer outcomes and greater postoperative disability.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.",
author = "Eric Mai and Eric Kim and Austin Kaidi and Tejas Subramanian and Simon, {Chad Z} and Tomoyuki Asada and Cole Kwas and Joshua Zhang and Kasra Araghi and Nishtha Singh and Olivia Tuma and Maximilian Korsun and Myles Allen and Annika Heuer and Sheha, {Evan D} and James Dowdell and Huang, {Russel C} and Albert, {Todd J} and Qureshi, {Sheeraz A} and Sravisht Iyer",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2024",
month = sep,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0000000000005020",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "1251--1258",
journal = "SPINE",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "18",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Cervical Disc Replacement for Cervical Radiculopathy

AU - Mai, Eric

AU - Kim, Eric

AU - Kaidi, Austin

AU - Subramanian, Tejas

AU - Simon, Chad Z

AU - Asada, Tomoyuki

AU - Kwas, Cole

AU - Zhang, Joshua

AU - Araghi, Kasra

AU - Singh, Nishtha

AU - Tuma, Olivia

AU - Korsun, Maximilian

AU - Allen, Myles

AU - Heuer, Annika

AU - Sheha, Evan D

AU - Dowdell, James

AU - Huang, Russel C

AU - Albert, Todd J

AU - Qureshi, Sheeraz A

AU - Iyer, Sravisht

N1 - Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2024/9/15

Y1 - 2024/9/15

N2 - STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of preoperative symptom duration on postoperative functional outcomes after cervical disc replacement (CDR) for radiculopathy.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CDR has emerged as a reliable and efficacious treatment option for degenerative cervical spine pathologies. The relationship between preoperative symptom duration and outcomes after CDR is not well established.METHODS: Patients with radiculopathy without myelopathy who underwent primary 1- or 2-level CDRs were included and divided into shorter (<6 mo) and prolonged (≥6 mo) cohorts based on preoperative symptom duration. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included neck disability index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm. Changes in PROM scores and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) rates were calculated. Analyses were conducted on the early (within 3 mo) and late (6 mo-2 y) postoperative periods.RESULTS: A total of 201 patients (43.6±8.7 y, 33.3% female) were included. In both early and late postoperative periods, the shorter preoperative symptom duration cohort experienced significantly greater change from preoperative PROM scores compared with the prolonged symptom duration cohort for NDI, VAS-Neck, and VAS-Arm. The shorter symptom duration cohort achieved MCID in the early postoperative period at a significantly higher rate for NDI (78.9% vs. 54.9%, P =0.001), VAS-Neck (87.0% vs. 56.0%, P <0.001), and VAS-Arm (90.5% vs. 70.7%, P =0.002). Prolonged preoperative symptom duration (≥6 mo) was identified as an independent risk factor for failure to achieve MCID at the latest timepoint for NDI (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2-6.9, P =0.016), VAS-Neck (OR: 9.8, 95% CI: 3.7-26.0, P <0.001), and VAS-Arm (OR: 7.5, 95% CI: 2.5-22.5, P <0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates improved patient-reported outcomes for those with shorter preoperative symptom duration undergoing CDR for radiculopathy, suggesting delayed surgical intervention may result in poorer outcomes and greater postoperative disability.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

AB - STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of preoperative symptom duration on postoperative functional outcomes after cervical disc replacement (CDR) for radiculopathy.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CDR has emerged as a reliable and efficacious treatment option for degenerative cervical spine pathologies. The relationship between preoperative symptom duration and outcomes after CDR is not well established.METHODS: Patients with radiculopathy without myelopathy who underwent primary 1- or 2-level CDRs were included and divided into shorter (<6 mo) and prolonged (≥6 mo) cohorts based on preoperative symptom duration. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included neck disability index (NDI), visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm. Changes in PROM scores and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) rates were calculated. Analyses were conducted on the early (within 3 mo) and late (6 mo-2 y) postoperative periods.RESULTS: A total of 201 patients (43.6±8.7 y, 33.3% female) were included. In both early and late postoperative periods, the shorter preoperative symptom duration cohort experienced significantly greater change from preoperative PROM scores compared with the prolonged symptom duration cohort for NDI, VAS-Neck, and VAS-Arm. The shorter symptom duration cohort achieved MCID in the early postoperative period at a significantly higher rate for NDI (78.9% vs. 54.9%, P =0.001), VAS-Neck (87.0% vs. 56.0%, P <0.001), and VAS-Arm (90.5% vs. 70.7%, P =0.002). Prolonged preoperative symptom duration (≥6 mo) was identified as an independent risk factor for failure to achieve MCID at the latest timepoint for NDI (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.2-6.9, P =0.016), VAS-Neck (OR: 9.8, 95% CI: 3.7-26.0, P <0.001), and VAS-Arm (OR: 7.5, 95% CI: 2.5-22.5, P <0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates improved patient-reported outcomes for those with shorter preoperative symptom duration undergoing CDR for radiculopathy, suggesting delayed surgical intervention may result in poorer outcomes and greater postoperative disability.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005020

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005020

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 38679871

VL - 49

SP - 1251

EP - 1258

JO - SPINE

JF - SPINE

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 18

ER -