Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

Standard

Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. / Xylinas, Evanguelos; Rink, Michael; Cha, Eugene K; Clozel, Thomas; Lee, Richard K; Fajkovic, Harun; Comploj, Evi; Novara, Giacomo; Margulis, Vitaly; Raman, Jay D; Lotan, Yair; Kassouf, Wassim; Fritsche, Hans-Martin; Weizer, Alon; Martinez-Salamanca, Juan I; Matsumoto, Kazumasa; Zigeuner, Richard; Pycha, Armin; Scherr, Douglas S; Seitz, Christian; Walton, Thomas; Trinh, Quoc-Dien; Karakiewicz, Pierre I; Matin, Surena; Montorsi, Francesco; Zerbib, Marc; Shariat, Shahrokh F; Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration (UTUCC).

In: EUR UROL, Vol. 65, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 210-217.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Xylinas, E, Rink, M, Cha, EK, Clozel, T, Lee, RK, Fajkovic, H, Comploj, E, Novara, G, Margulis, V, Raman, JD, Lotan, Y, Kassouf, W, Fritsche, H-M, Weizer, A, Martinez-Salamanca, JI, Matsumoto, K, Zigeuner, R, Pycha, A, Scherr, DS, Seitz, C, Walton, T, Trinh, Q-D, Karakiewicz, PI, Matin, S, Montorsi, F, Zerbib, M, Shariat, SF & Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration (UTUCC) 2014, 'Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma', EUR UROL, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.052

APA

Xylinas, E., Rink, M., Cha, E. K., Clozel, T., Lee, R. K., Fajkovic, H., Comploj, E., Novara, G., Margulis, V., Raman, J. D., Lotan, Y., Kassouf, W., Fritsche, H-M., Weizer, A., Martinez-Salamanca, J. I., Matsumoto, K., Zigeuner, R., Pycha, A., Scherr, D. S., ... Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration (UTUCC) (2014). Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. EUR UROL, 65(1), 210-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.052

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{af2acd267d8e4ea1a865b124a75f93cb,
title = "Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach to the bladder cuff during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).OBJECTIVES: To compare the oncologic outcomes following RNU using three different methods of bladder cuff management.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of 2681 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at 24 international institutions from 1987 to 2007.INTERVENTION: Three methods of bladder cuff excision were performed: transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic.OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Univariable and multivariable models tested the effect of distal ureter management on intravesical recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 2681 patients, 1811 (67.5%) underwent the transvesical approach; 785 (29.3%), the extravesical approach; and 85 (3.2%), the endoscopic approach. There was no difference in terms of RFS, CSS, and OS among the three distal ureteral management approaches. Patients who underwent the endoscopic approach were at significantly higher risk of intravesical recurrence compared with those who underwent the transvesical (p=0.02) or extravesical approaches (p=0.02); the latter two groups did not differ from each other (p=0.40). Actuarial intravesical RFS estimates at 2 and 5 yr after RNU were 69% and 58%, 69% and 51%, and 61% and 42% for the transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic approaches, respectively. In multivariate analyses, distal ureteral management (p=0.01), surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic; p=0.02), previous bladder cancer (p<0.001), higher tumor stage (trend; p=0.01), concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) (p<0.001), and lymph node involvement (trend; p<0.001) were all associated with intravesical recurrence. Excluding patients with history of previous bladder cancer, all variables remained independent predictors of intravesical recurrence.CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic approach was associated with higher intravesical recurrence rates. Interestingly, concomitant CIS in the upper tract is a strong predictor of intravesical recurrence after RNU. The association of laparoscopic RNU with intravesical recurrence needs to be further investigated.",
author = "Evanguelos Xylinas and Michael Rink and Cha, {Eugene K} and Thomas Clozel and Lee, {Richard K} and Harun Fajkovic and Evi Comploj and Giacomo Novara and Vitaly Margulis and Raman, {Jay D} and Yair Lotan and Wassim Kassouf and Hans-Martin Fritsche and Alon Weizer and Martinez-Salamanca, {Juan I} and Kazumasa Matsumoto and Richard Zigeuner and Armin Pycha and Scherr, {Douglas S} and Christian Seitz and Thomas Walton and Quoc-Dien Trinh and Karakiewicz, {Pierre I} and Surena Matin and Francesco Montorsi and Marc Zerbib and Shariat, {Shahrokh F} and {Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration (UTUCC)}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2014",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.052",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "210--217",
journal = "EUR UROL",
issn = "0302-2838",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of distal ureter management on oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

AU - Xylinas, Evanguelos

AU - Rink, Michael

AU - Cha, Eugene K

AU - Clozel, Thomas

AU - Lee, Richard K

AU - Fajkovic, Harun

AU - Comploj, Evi

AU - Novara, Giacomo

AU - Margulis, Vitaly

AU - Raman, Jay D

AU - Lotan, Yair

AU - Kassouf, Wassim

AU - Fritsche, Hans-Martin

AU - Weizer, Alon

AU - Martinez-Salamanca, Juan I

AU - Matsumoto, Kazumasa

AU - Zigeuner, Richard

AU - Pycha, Armin

AU - Scherr, Douglas S

AU - Seitz, Christian

AU - Walton, Thomas

AU - Trinh, Quoc-Dien

AU - Karakiewicz, Pierre I

AU - Matin, Surena

AU - Montorsi, Francesco

AU - Zerbib, Marc

AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F

AU - Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration (UTUCC)

N1 - Copyright © 2012 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach to the bladder cuff during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).OBJECTIVES: To compare the oncologic outcomes following RNU using three different methods of bladder cuff management.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of 2681 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at 24 international institutions from 1987 to 2007.INTERVENTION: Three methods of bladder cuff excision were performed: transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic.OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Univariable and multivariable models tested the effect of distal ureter management on intravesical recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 2681 patients, 1811 (67.5%) underwent the transvesical approach; 785 (29.3%), the extravesical approach; and 85 (3.2%), the endoscopic approach. There was no difference in terms of RFS, CSS, and OS among the three distal ureteral management approaches. Patients who underwent the endoscopic approach were at significantly higher risk of intravesical recurrence compared with those who underwent the transvesical (p=0.02) or extravesical approaches (p=0.02); the latter two groups did not differ from each other (p=0.40). Actuarial intravesical RFS estimates at 2 and 5 yr after RNU were 69% and 58%, 69% and 51%, and 61% and 42% for the transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic approaches, respectively. In multivariate analyses, distal ureteral management (p=0.01), surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic; p=0.02), previous bladder cancer (p<0.001), higher tumor stage (trend; p=0.01), concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) (p<0.001), and lymph node involvement (trend; p<0.001) were all associated with intravesical recurrence. Excluding patients with history of previous bladder cancer, all variables remained independent predictors of intravesical recurrence.CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic approach was associated with higher intravesical recurrence rates. Interestingly, concomitant CIS in the upper tract is a strong predictor of intravesical recurrence after RNU. The association of laparoscopic RNU with intravesical recurrence needs to be further investigated.

AB - BACKGROUND: There is a lack of consensus regarding the optimal approach to the bladder cuff during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).OBJECTIVES: To compare the oncologic outcomes following RNU using three different methods of bladder cuff management.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of 2681 patients treated with RNU for UTUC at 24 international institutions from 1987 to 2007.INTERVENTION: Three methods of bladder cuff excision were performed: transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic.OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Univariable and multivariable models tested the effect of distal ureter management on intravesical recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 2681 patients, 1811 (67.5%) underwent the transvesical approach; 785 (29.3%), the extravesical approach; and 85 (3.2%), the endoscopic approach. There was no difference in terms of RFS, CSS, and OS among the three distal ureteral management approaches. Patients who underwent the endoscopic approach were at significantly higher risk of intravesical recurrence compared with those who underwent the transvesical (p=0.02) or extravesical approaches (p=0.02); the latter two groups did not differ from each other (p=0.40). Actuarial intravesical RFS estimates at 2 and 5 yr after RNU were 69% and 58%, 69% and 51%, and 61% and 42% for the transvesical, extravesical, and endoscopic approaches, respectively. In multivariate analyses, distal ureteral management (p=0.01), surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic; p=0.02), previous bladder cancer (p<0.001), higher tumor stage (trend; p=0.01), concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS) (p<0.001), and lymph node involvement (trend; p<0.001) were all associated with intravesical recurrence. Excluding patients with history of previous bladder cancer, all variables remained independent predictors of intravesical recurrence.CONCLUSIONS: The endoscopic approach was associated with higher intravesical recurrence rates. Interestingly, concomitant CIS in the upper tract is a strong predictor of intravesical recurrence after RNU. The association of laparoscopic RNU with intravesical recurrence needs to be further investigated.

U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.052

DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.04.052

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 22579047

VL - 65

SP - 210

EP - 217

JO - EUR UROL

JF - EUR UROL

SN - 0302-2838

IS - 1

ER -