Immunological methods for diagnosis and monitoring of IgE-mediated allergy caused by industrial sensitizing agents (IMExAllergy)

Standard

Immunological methods for diagnosis and monitoring of IgE-mediated allergy caused by industrial sensitizing agents (IMExAllergy). / Baur, Xaver; Akdis, Cezmi A; Budnik, Lygia Therese; Cruz, Maria Jesus; Fischer, Axel; Förster-Ruhrmann, Ulrike; Göen, Thomas; Goksel, Ozlem; Heutelbeck, Astrid R; Jones, Meinir; Lux, Harald; Maestrelli, Piero; Munoz, Xavier; Nemery, Benoit; Schlünssen, Vivi; Sigsgaard, Torben; Traidl-Hoffmann, Claudia; Siegel, Paul.

In: ALLERGY, Vol. 74, No. 10, 10.2019, p. 1885-1897.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Review articleResearch

Harvard

Baur, X, Akdis, CA, Budnik, LT, Cruz, MJ, Fischer, A, Förster-Ruhrmann, U, Göen, T, Goksel, O, Heutelbeck, AR, Jones, M, Lux, H, Maestrelli, P, Munoz, X, Nemery, B, Schlünssen, V, Sigsgaard, T, Traidl-Hoffmann, C & Siegel, P 2019, 'Immunological methods for diagnosis and monitoring of IgE-mediated allergy caused by industrial sensitizing agents (IMExAllergy)', ALLERGY, vol. 74, no. 10, pp. 1885-1897. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13809

APA

Baur, X., Akdis, C. A., Budnik, L. T., Cruz, M. J., Fischer, A., Förster-Ruhrmann, U., Göen, T., Goksel, O., Heutelbeck, A. R., Jones, M., Lux, H., Maestrelli, P., Munoz, X., Nemery, B., Schlünssen, V., Sigsgaard, T., Traidl-Hoffmann, C., & Siegel, P. (2019). Immunological methods for diagnosis and monitoring of IgE-mediated allergy caused by industrial sensitizing agents (IMExAllergy). ALLERGY, 74(10), 1885-1897. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13809

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{7c5b8181ff364985b6c6ba49a1dbf2b3,
title = "Immunological methods for diagnosis and monitoring of IgE-mediated allergy caused by industrial sensitizing agents (IMExAllergy)",
abstract = "Industrial sensitizing agents (allergens) in living and working environments play an important role in eliciting type 1 allergic disorders including asthma and allergic rhinitis. Successful management of allergic diseases necessitates identifying their specific causes (ie, identify the causative agent(s) and the route of contact to allergen: airborne, or skin contact) to avoid further exposure. Identification of sensitization by a sensitive and validated measurement of specific IgE is an important step in the diagnosis. However, only a limited number of environmental and occupational allergens are available on the market for use in sIgE testing. Accordingly, specific in-house testing by individual diagnostic and laboratory centers is often required. Currently, different immunological tests are in use at various diagnostic centers that often produce considerably divergent results, mostly due to lack of standardized allergen preparation and standardized procedures as well as inadequate quality control. Our review and meta-analysis exhibited satisfactory performance of sIgE detection test for most high molecular weight (HMW) allergens with a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 and specificity of 0.71. However, for low molecular weight (LMW) allergens, pooled sensitivity is generally lower (0.28) and specificity higher (0.89) than for HMW tests. Major recommendations based on the presented data include diagnostic use of sIgE to HMW allergens. A negative sIgE result for LMW agents does not exclude sensitization. In addition, the requirements for full transparency of the content of allergen preparations with details on standardization and quality control are underlined. Development of standard operating procedures for in-house sIgE assays, and clinical validation, centralized quality control and audits are emphasized. There is also a need for specialized laboratories to provide a custom service for the development of tests for the measurement of putative novel occupational allergens that are not commercially available.",
keywords = "Journal Article, Review",
author = "Xaver Baur and Akdis, {Cezmi A} and Budnik, {Lygia Therese} and Cruz, {Maria Jesus} and Axel Fischer and Ulrike F{\"o}rster-Ruhrmann and Thomas G{\"o}en and Ozlem Goksel and Heutelbeck, {Astrid R} and Meinir Jones and Harald Lux and Piero Maestrelli and Xavier Munoz and Benoit Nemery and Vivi Schl{\"u}nssen and Torben Sigsgaard and Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann and Paul Siegel",
note = "This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1111/all.13809",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "1885--1897",
journal = "ALLERGY",
issn = "0105-4538",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immunological methods for diagnosis and monitoring of IgE-mediated allergy caused by industrial sensitizing agents (IMExAllergy)

AU - Baur, Xaver

AU - Akdis, Cezmi A

AU - Budnik, Lygia Therese

AU - Cruz, Maria Jesus

AU - Fischer, Axel

AU - Förster-Ruhrmann, Ulrike

AU - Göen, Thomas

AU - Goksel, Ozlem

AU - Heutelbeck, Astrid R

AU - Jones, Meinir

AU - Lux, Harald

AU - Maestrelli, Piero

AU - Munoz, Xavier

AU - Nemery, Benoit

AU - Schlünssen, Vivi

AU - Sigsgaard, Torben

AU - Traidl-Hoffmann, Claudia

AU - Siegel, Paul

N1 - This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Industrial sensitizing agents (allergens) in living and working environments play an important role in eliciting type 1 allergic disorders including asthma and allergic rhinitis. Successful management of allergic diseases necessitates identifying their specific causes (ie, identify the causative agent(s) and the route of contact to allergen: airborne, or skin contact) to avoid further exposure. Identification of sensitization by a sensitive and validated measurement of specific IgE is an important step in the diagnosis. However, only a limited number of environmental and occupational allergens are available on the market for use in sIgE testing. Accordingly, specific in-house testing by individual diagnostic and laboratory centers is often required. Currently, different immunological tests are in use at various diagnostic centers that often produce considerably divergent results, mostly due to lack of standardized allergen preparation and standardized procedures as well as inadequate quality control. Our review and meta-analysis exhibited satisfactory performance of sIgE detection test for most high molecular weight (HMW) allergens with a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 and specificity of 0.71. However, for low molecular weight (LMW) allergens, pooled sensitivity is generally lower (0.28) and specificity higher (0.89) than for HMW tests. Major recommendations based on the presented data include diagnostic use of sIgE to HMW allergens. A negative sIgE result for LMW agents does not exclude sensitization. In addition, the requirements for full transparency of the content of allergen preparations with details on standardization and quality control are underlined. Development of standard operating procedures for in-house sIgE assays, and clinical validation, centralized quality control and audits are emphasized. There is also a need for specialized laboratories to provide a custom service for the development of tests for the measurement of putative novel occupational allergens that are not commercially available.

AB - Industrial sensitizing agents (allergens) in living and working environments play an important role in eliciting type 1 allergic disorders including asthma and allergic rhinitis. Successful management of allergic diseases necessitates identifying their specific causes (ie, identify the causative agent(s) and the route of contact to allergen: airborne, or skin contact) to avoid further exposure. Identification of sensitization by a sensitive and validated measurement of specific IgE is an important step in the diagnosis. However, only a limited number of environmental and occupational allergens are available on the market for use in sIgE testing. Accordingly, specific in-house testing by individual diagnostic and laboratory centers is often required. Currently, different immunological tests are in use at various diagnostic centers that often produce considerably divergent results, mostly due to lack of standardized allergen preparation and standardized procedures as well as inadequate quality control. Our review and meta-analysis exhibited satisfactory performance of sIgE detection test for most high molecular weight (HMW) allergens with a pooled sensitivity of 0.74 and specificity of 0.71. However, for low molecular weight (LMW) allergens, pooled sensitivity is generally lower (0.28) and specificity higher (0.89) than for HMW tests. Major recommendations based on the presented data include diagnostic use of sIgE to HMW allergens. A negative sIgE result for LMW agents does not exclude sensitization. In addition, the requirements for full transparency of the content of allergen preparations with details on standardization and quality control are underlined. Development of standard operating procedures for in-house sIgE assays, and clinical validation, centralized quality control and audits are emphasized. There is also a need for specialized laboratories to provide a custom service for the development of tests for the measurement of putative novel occupational allergens that are not commercially available.

KW - Journal Article

KW - Review

U2 - 10.1111/all.13809

DO - 10.1111/all.13809

M3 - SCORING: Review article

C2 - 30953599

VL - 74

SP - 1885

EP - 1897

JO - ALLERGY

JF - ALLERGY

SN - 0105-4538

IS - 10

ER -