Immediate effects of different steps of rhinoplasty on nasolabial angle and tip projection

Standard

Immediate effects of different steps of rhinoplasty on nasolabial angle and tip projection. / Bohluli, Behnam; Bagheri, Shahrokh C; Behkish, Betsabeh; Moharamnejad, Nima; Sadr-Eshkevari, Pooyan; Rashad, Ashkan.

In: J CRANIOFAC SURG, Vol. 25, No. 5, 09.2014, p. e404-6.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bohluli, B, Bagheri, SC, Behkish, B, Moharamnejad, N, Sadr-Eshkevari, P & Rashad, A 2014, 'Immediate effects of different steps of rhinoplasty on nasolabial angle and tip projection', J CRANIOFAC SURG, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. e404-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000601

APA

Bohluli, B., Bagheri, S. C., Behkish, B., Moharamnejad, N., Sadr-Eshkevari, P., & Rashad, A. (2014). Immediate effects of different steps of rhinoplasty on nasolabial angle and tip projection. J CRANIOFAC SURG, 25(5), e404-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000601

Vancouver

Bohluli B, Bagheri SC, Behkish B, Moharamnejad N, Sadr-Eshkevari P, Rashad A. Immediate effects of different steps of rhinoplasty on nasolabial angle and tip projection. J CRANIOFAC SURG. 2014 Sep;25(5):e404-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000601

Bibtex

@article{d941f2fb1230436181f1ccbaf8c9b16f,
title = "Immediate effects of different steps of rhinoplasty on nasolabial angle and tip projection",
abstract = "Nasolabial angle (NLA) and nasal tip projection (NTP) play an important role in aesthetic nose surgery. Little deviations can determine success and failure. The goal of this study was to analyze the immediate effect of different steps of open rhinoplasty on NLA and NTP. In this prospective single-blind study, 50 consecutive rhinoplasty cases were considered. The study consisted of 38 women and 12 men. The mean age was 28 years, ranging from 17 to 37 years. A standard life-size photograph was taken in each step of a classic open rhinoplasty during surgery. Nasolabial angle and NTP were measured and analyzed. Nasolabial angle: average increase after skeletonization (2.26 degrees), strut insertion (4 degrees), and tip spanning (0.17 degrees), whereas cephalic resection caused a decrease (1.9 degrees). Nasal tip projection: average increase after skeletonization (0.1 mm), strut insertion (0.31 mm), and tip spanning (0.84 mm), whereas cephalic resection caused a decrease (0.53 mm). Whereas strut insertion caused the highest mean increase in NLA, tip spanning was the most effective regarding change of NTP. Expectably cephalic resection was associated with decrease in NLA and NTP. ",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Esthetics, Female, Humans, Male, Nose, Prospective Studies, Rhinoplasty, Single-Blind Method, Young Adult, Journal Article",
author = "Behnam Bohluli and Bagheri, {Shahrokh C} and Betsabeh Behkish and Nima Moharamnejad and Pooyan Sadr-Eshkevari and Ashkan Rashad",
year = "2014",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0000000000000601",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "e404--6",
journal = "J CRANIOFAC SURG",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immediate effects of different steps of rhinoplasty on nasolabial angle and tip projection

AU - Bohluli, Behnam

AU - Bagheri, Shahrokh C

AU - Behkish, Betsabeh

AU - Moharamnejad, Nima

AU - Sadr-Eshkevari, Pooyan

AU - Rashad, Ashkan

PY - 2014/9

Y1 - 2014/9

N2 - Nasolabial angle (NLA) and nasal tip projection (NTP) play an important role in aesthetic nose surgery. Little deviations can determine success and failure. The goal of this study was to analyze the immediate effect of different steps of open rhinoplasty on NLA and NTP. In this prospective single-blind study, 50 consecutive rhinoplasty cases were considered. The study consisted of 38 women and 12 men. The mean age was 28 years, ranging from 17 to 37 years. A standard life-size photograph was taken in each step of a classic open rhinoplasty during surgery. Nasolabial angle and NTP were measured and analyzed. Nasolabial angle: average increase after skeletonization (2.26 degrees), strut insertion (4 degrees), and tip spanning (0.17 degrees), whereas cephalic resection caused a decrease (1.9 degrees). Nasal tip projection: average increase after skeletonization (0.1 mm), strut insertion (0.31 mm), and tip spanning (0.84 mm), whereas cephalic resection caused a decrease (0.53 mm). Whereas strut insertion caused the highest mean increase in NLA, tip spanning was the most effective regarding change of NTP. Expectably cephalic resection was associated with decrease in NLA and NTP.

AB - Nasolabial angle (NLA) and nasal tip projection (NTP) play an important role in aesthetic nose surgery. Little deviations can determine success and failure. The goal of this study was to analyze the immediate effect of different steps of open rhinoplasty on NLA and NTP. In this prospective single-blind study, 50 consecutive rhinoplasty cases were considered. The study consisted of 38 women and 12 men. The mean age was 28 years, ranging from 17 to 37 years. A standard life-size photograph was taken in each step of a classic open rhinoplasty during surgery. Nasolabial angle and NTP were measured and analyzed. Nasolabial angle: average increase after skeletonization (2.26 degrees), strut insertion (4 degrees), and tip spanning (0.17 degrees), whereas cephalic resection caused a decrease (1.9 degrees). Nasal tip projection: average increase after skeletonization (0.1 mm), strut insertion (0.31 mm), and tip spanning (0.84 mm), whereas cephalic resection caused a decrease (0.53 mm). Whereas strut insertion caused the highest mean increase in NLA, tip spanning was the most effective regarding change of NTP. Expectably cephalic resection was associated with decrease in NLA and NTP.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Esthetics

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Nose

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Rhinoplasty

KW - Single-Blind Method

KW - Young Adult

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000601

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000601

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 25203586

VL - 25

SP - e404-6

JO - J CRANIOFAC SURG

JF - J CRANIOFAC SURG

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 5

ER -