Imaging Evaluation of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Survey-Based Assessment

Standard

Imaging Evaluation of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Survey-Based Assessment. / Ahlawat, Shivani; Ly, K Ina; Fayad, Laura M; Fisher, Michael J; Lessing, Andrés J; Berg, Dale J; Salamon, Johannes M; Mautner, Victor-Felix; Babovic-Vuksanovic, Dusica; Dombi, Eva; Harris, Gordon; Plotkin, Scott R; Blakeley, Jaishri; REiNS International Collaboration.

In: NEUROLOGY, Vol. 97, No. 7 Suppl 1, 17.08.2021, p. S111-S119.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Ahlawat, S, Ly, KI, Fayad, LM, Fisher, MJ, Lessing, AJ, Berg, DJ, Salamon, JM, Mautner, V-F, Babovic-Vuksanovic, D, Dombi, E, Harris, G, Plotkin, SR, Blakeley, J & REiNS International Collaboration 2021, 'Imaging Evaluation of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Survey-Based Assessment', NEUROLOGY, vol. 97, no. 7 Suppl 1, pp. S111-S119. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012437

APA

Ahlawat, S., Ly, K. I., Fayad, L. M., Fisher, M. J., Lessing, A. J., Berg, D. J., Salamon, J. M., Mautner, V-F., Babovic-Vuksanovic, D., Dombi, E., Harris, G., Plotkin, S. R., Blakeley, J., & REiNS International Collaboration (2021). Imaging Evaluation of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Survey-Based Assessment. NEUROLOGY, 97(7 Suppl 1), S111-S119. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012437

Vancouver

Ahlawat S, Ly KI, Fayad LM, Fisher MJ, Lessing AJ, Berg DJ et al. Imaging Evaluation of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Survey-Based Assessment. NEUROLOGY. 2021 Aug 17;97(7 Suppl 1):S111-S119. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012437

Bibtex

@article{6d22b7229a6e4b91b9b3c0d6c6213616,
title = "Imaging Evaluation of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Survey-Based Assessment",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To assess imaging utilization practices across clinical specialists in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) for the evaluation of symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adults with or without plexiform neurofibromas (PN).METHODS: An institutional review board-exempt survey was administered to medical practitioners caring for individuals with NF1 at the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) meeting in September 2019. The survey included questions on respondent demographic data (9 questions), type of imaging obtained for asymptomatic (4 questions) and symptomatic (4 questions) people with and without PN, and utilization of diffusion-weighted imaging (2 questions).RESULTS: Thirty practitioners participated in the survey. Most were academic neuro-oncologists at high-volume (>10 patients/week) NF1 centers. Of 30 respondents, 26 had access to whole-body MRI (WB-MRI). The most common approach to an asymptomatic person without PN was no imaging (adults: 57% [17/30]; children: 50% [15/30]), followed by a screening WB-MRI (adults: 20% [6/30]; children: 26.7% [8/30]). The most common approach to a person with symptoms or known PN was regional MRI (adults: 90% [27/30]; children: 93% [28/30]), followed by WB-MRI (adults: 20% [6/30]; children: 36.7% [11/30]). WB-MRI was most often obtained to evaluate a symptomatic child with PN (37% [11/30]).CONCLUSIONS: More than 90% of practitioners indicated they would obtain a regional MRI in a symptomatic patient without known or visible PN. Otherwise, there was little consensus on imaging practices. Given the high prevalence of PN and risk of malignant conversion in this patient population, there is a need to define imaging-based guidelines for optimal clinical care and the design of future clinical trials.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Child, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods, Male, Middle Aged, Neurilemmoma/pathology, Neurofibroma, Plexiform/diagnosis, Neurofibromatoses/pathology, Neurofibromatosis 1/diagnosis, Skin Neoplasms/pathology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult",
author = "Shivani Ahlawat and Ly, {K Ina} and Fayad, {Laura M} and Fisher, {Michael J} and Lessing, {Andr{\'e}s J} and Berg, {Dale J} and Salamon, {Johannes M} and Victor-Felix Mautner and Dusica Babovic-Vuksanovic and Eva Dombi and Gordon Harris and Plotkin, {Scott R} and Jaishri Blakeley and {REiNS International Collaboration}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2021 American Academy of Neurology.",
year = "2021",
month = aug,
day = "17",
doi = "10.1212/WNL.0000000000012437",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
pages = "S111--S119",
journal = "NEUROLOGY",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7 Suppl 1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imaging Evaluation of Plexiform Neurofibromas in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Survey-Based Assessment

AU - Ahlawat, Shivani

AU - Ly, K Ina

AU - Fayad, Laura M

AU - Fisher, Michael J

AU - Lessing, Andrés J

AU - Berg, Dale J

AU - Salamon, Johannes M

AU - Mautner, Victor-Felix

AU - Babovic-Vuksanovic, Dusica

AU - Dombi, Eva

AU - Harris, Gordon

AU - Plotkin, Scott R

AU - Blakeley, Jaishri

AU - REiNS International Collaboration

N1 - © 2021 American Academy of Neurology.

PY - 2021/8/17

Y1 - 2021/8/17

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess imaging utilization practices across clinical specialists in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) for the evaluation of symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adults with or without plexiform neurofibromas (PN).METHODS: An institutional review board-exempt survey was administered to medical practitioners caring for individuals with NF1 at the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) meeting in September 2019. The survey included questions on respondent demographic data (9 questions), type of imaging obtained for asymptomatic (4 questions) and symptomatic (4 questions) people with and without PN, and utilization of diffusion-weighted imaging (2 questions).RESULTS: Thirty practitioners participated in the survey. Most were academic neuro-oncologists at high-volume (>10 patients/week) NF1 centers. Of 30 respondents, 26 had access to whole-body MRI (WB-MRI). The most common approach to an asymptomatic person without PN was no imaging (adults: 57% [17/30]; children: 50% [15/30]), followed by a screening WB-MRI (adults: 20% [6/30]; children: 26.7% [8/30]). The most common approach to a person with symptoms or known PN was regional MRI (adults: 90% [27/30]; children: 93% [28/30]), followed by WB-MRI (adults: 20% [6/30]; children: 36.7% [11/30]). WB-MRI was most often obtained to evaluate a symptomatic child with PN (37% [11/30]).CONCLUSIONS: More than 90% of practitioners indicated they would obtain a regional MRI in a symptomatic patient without known or visible PN. Otherwise, there was little consensus on imaging practices. Given the high prevalence of PN and risk of malignant conversion in this patient population, there is a need to define imaging-based guidelines for optimal clinical care and the design of future clinical trials.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To assess imaging utilization practices across clinical specialists in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) for the evaluation of symptomatic and asymptomatic children and adults with or without plexiform neurofibromas (PN).METHODS: An institutional review board-exempt survey was administered to medical practitioners caring for individuals with NF1 at the Response Evaluation in Neurofibromatosis and Schwannomatosis (REiNS) meeting in September 2019. The survey included questions on respondent demographic data (9 questions), type of imaging obtained for asymptomatic (4 questions) and symptomatic (4 questions) people with and without PN, and utilization of diffusion-weighted imaging (2 questions).RESULTS: Thirty practitioners participated in the survey. Most were academic neuro-oncologists at high-volume (>10 patients/week) NF1 centers. Of 30 respondents, 26 had access to whole-body MRI (WB-MRI). The most common approach to an asymptomatic person without PN was no imaging (adults: 57% [17/30]; children: 50% [15/30]), followed by a screening WB-MRI (adults: 20% [6/30]; children: 26.7% [8/30]). The most common approach to a person with symptoms or known PN was regional MRI (adults: 90% [27/30]; children: 93% [28/30]), followed by WB-MRI (adults: 20% [6/30]; children: 36.7% [11/30]). WB-MRI was most often obtained to evaluate a symptomatic child with PN (37% [11/30]).CONCLUSIONS: More than 90% of practitioners indicated they would obtain a regional MRI in a symptomatic patient without known or visible PN. Otherwise, there was little consensus on imaging practices. Given the high prevalence of PN and risk of malignant conversion in this patient population, there is a need to define imaging-based guidelines for optimal clinical care and the design of future clinical trials.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Child

KW - Humans

KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neurilemmoma/pathology

KW - Neurofibroma, Plexiform/diagnosis

KW - Neurofibromatoses/pathology

KW - Neurofibromatosis 1/diagnosis

KW - Skin Neoplasms/pathology

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012437

DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012437

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34230200

VL - 97

SP - S111-S119

JO - NEUROLOGY

JF - NEUROLOGY

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 7 Suppl 1

ER -