How Communication “Failed” or “Saved the Day”: Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors

Standard

How Communication “Failed” or “Saved the Day”: Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors. / Street, Richard L; Petrocelli, John V; Amroze, Azraa; Bergelt, Corinna; Murphy, Margaret; Wieting, J Michael; Mazor, Kathleen M.

In: J PATIENT EXPERIENCE, Vol. 7, No. 6, 12.2020, p. 1247-1254.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Street, RL, Petrocelli, JV, Amroze, A, Bergelt, C, Murphy, M, Wieting, JM & Mazor, KM 2020, 'How Communication “Failed” or “Saved the Day”: Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors', J PATIENT EXPERIENCE, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1247-1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520925270

APA

Street, R. L., Petrocelli, J. V., Amroze, A., Bergelt, C., Murphy, M., Wieting, J. M., & Mazor, K. M. (2020). How Communication “Failed” or “Saved the Day”: Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors. J PATIENT EXPERIENCE, 7(6), 1247-1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520925270

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{d5ac2a71a0314cf7b273a091a167130c,
title = "How Communication “Failed” or “Saved the Day”: Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors",
abstract = "Communication breakdowns among clinicians, patients, and family members can lead to medical errors, yet effective communication may prevent such mistakes. This investigation examined patients' and family members' experiences where they believed communication failures contributed to medical errors or where effective communication prevented a medical error ({"}close calls{"}). The study conducted a thematic analysis of open-ended responses to an online survey of patients' and family members' past experiences with medical errors or close calls. Of the 93 respondents, 56 (60%) provided stories of medical errors, and the remaining described close calls. Two predominant themes emerged in medical error stories that were attributed to health care providers-information inadequacy (eg, delayed, inaccurate) and not listening to or being dismissive of a patient's or family member's concerns. In stories of close calls, a patient's or family member's proactive communication (eg, being assertive, persistent) most often {"}saved the day.{"} The findings highlight the importance of encouraging active patient/family involvement in a patient's medical care to prevent errors and of improving systems to provide meaningful information in a timely manner.",
author = "Street, {Richard L} and Petrocelli, {John V} and Azraa Amroze and Corinna Bergelt and Margaret Murphy and Wieting, {J Michael} and Mazor, {Kathleen M}",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2020.",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
doi = "https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520925270",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "1247--1254",
journal = "J PATIENT EXPERIENCE",
issn = "2374-3743",
publisher = "Sage",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - How Communication “Failed” or “Saved the Day”: Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors

AU - Street, Richard L

AU - Petrocelli, John V

AU - Amroze, Azraa

AU - Bergelt, Corinna

AU - Murphy, Margaret

AU - Wieting, J Michael

AU - Mazor, Kathleen M

N1 - © The Author(s) 2020.

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - Communication breakdowns among clinicians, patients, and family members can lead to medical errors, yet effective communication may prevent such mistakes. This investigation examined patients' and family members' experiences where they believed communication failures contributed to medical errors or where effective communication prevented a medical error ("close calls"). The study conducted a thematic analysis of open-ended responses to an online survey of patients' and family members' past experiences with medical errors or close calls. Of the 93 respondents, 56 (60%) provided stories of medical errors, and the remaining described close calls. Two predominant themes emerged in medical error stories that were attributed to health care providers-information inadequacy (eg, delayed, inaccurate) and not listening to or being dismissive of a patient's or family member's concerns. In stories of close calls, a patient's or family member's proactive communication (eg, being assertive, persistent) most often "saved the day." The findings highlight the importance of encouraging active patient/family involvement in a patient's medical care to prevent errors and of improving systems to provide meaningful information in a timely manner.

AB - Communication breakdowns among clinicians, patients, and family members can lead to medical errors, yet effective communication may prevent such mistakes. This investigation examined patients' and family members' experiences where they believed communication failures contributed to medical errors or where effective communication prevented a medical error ("close calls"). The study conducted a thematic analysis of open-ended responses to an online survey of patients' and family members' past experiences with medical errors or close calls. Of the 93 respondents, 56 (60%) provided stories of medical errors, and the remaining described close calls. Two predominant themes emerged in medical error stories that were attributed to health care providers-information inadequacy (eg, delayed, inaccurate) and not listening to or being dismissive of a patient's or family member's concerns. In stories of close calls, a patient's or family member's proactive communication (eg, being assertive, persistent) most often "saved the day." The findings highlight the importance of encouraging active patient/family involvement in a patient's medical care to prevent errors and of improving systems to provide meaningful information in a timely manner.

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520925270

DO - https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520925270

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 33457572

VL - 7

SP - 1247

EP - 1254

JO - J PATIENT EXPERIENCE

JF - J PATIENT EXPERIENCE

SN - 2374-3743

IS - 6

ER -