Homoeopathic versus conventional treatment of children with eczema: a comparative cohort study.
Standard
Homoeopathic versus conventional treatment of children with eczema: a comparative cohort study. / Keil, T; Witt, C M; Roll, S; Vance, W; Weber, K; Wegscheider, Karl; Willich, S N.
In: COMPLEMENT THER MED, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1, 2008, p. 15-21.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Homoeopathic versus conventional treatment of children with eczema: a comparative cohort study.
AU - Keil, T
AU - Witt, C M
AU - Roll, S
AU - Vance, W
AU - Weber, K
AU - Wegscheider, Karl
AU - Willich, S N
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To assess, over a period of 12 months, whether homoeopathic treatment could influence eczema signs/symptoms and quality of life (QoL) compared with conventional treatment. DESIGN: Prospective multi-centre cohort study. SETTING: Children with eczema aged 1-16 years were recruited from primary care practices. INTERVENTIONS: Conventional versus homoeopathic treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients (or parents) assessed eczema symptoms by numerical rating scales as well as disease-specific Atopie Lebensqualitaets-Fragebogen (ALF) and general quality of life (KINDL, KITA) at 0, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 118 children were included: 54 from homoeopathic (mean age+/-S.D. was 5.1+/-3.3 years; 56% boys) and 64 from conventional practices (6.2+/-3.8 years; 61% boys). Eczema symptoms (assessed by patients or their parents) improved from 0 to 12 months for both treatment options, but did not differ between the two groups: 3.5-2.5 versus 3.4-2.1; p=0.447 (adjusted). Disease-related quality of life improved in both groups similarly. In the subgroup of children aged 8-16 years the general quality of life showed a better trend for conventional treatment compared with homoeopathic treatment (p=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study is the first long-term prospective investigation to compare homoeopathic and conventional treatment of eczema in children. Over a period of 12 months, both therapy groups improved similarly regarding perception of eczema symptoms (assessed by patients or parents) and disease-related quality of life.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To assess, over a period of 12 months, whether homoeopathic treatment could influence eczema signs/symptoms and quality of life (QoL) compared with conventional treatment. DESIGN: Prospective multi-centre cohort study. SETTING: Children with eczema aged 1-16 years were recruited from primary care practices. INTERVENTIONS: Conventional versus homoeopathic treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients (or parents) assessed eczema symptoms by numerical rating scales as well as disease-specific Atopie Lebensqualitaets-Fragebogen (ALF) and general quality of life (KINDL, KITA) at 0, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 118 children were included: 54 from homoeopathic (mean age+/-S.D. was 5.1+/-3.3 years; 56% boys) and 64 from conventional practices (6.2+/-3.8 years; 61% boys). Eczema symptoms (assessed by patients or their parents) improved from 0 to 12 months for both treatment options, but did not differ between the two groups: 3.5-2.5 versus 3.4-2.1; p=0.447 (adjusted). Disease-related quality of life improved in both groups similarly. In the subgroup of children aged 8-16 years the general quality of life showed a better trend for conventional treatment compared with homoeopathic treatment (p=0.030). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study is the first long-term prospective investigation to compare homoeopathic and conventional treatment of eczema in children. Over a period of 12 months, both therapy groups improved similarly regarding perception of eczema symptoms (assessed by patients or parents) and disease-related quality of life.
M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz
VL - 16
SP - 15
EP - 21
JO - COMPLEMENT THER MED
JF - COMPLEMENT THER MED
SN - 0965-2299
IS - 1
M1 - 1
ER -
