Histopathologic features of ovarian borderline tumors are not predictive of clinical outcome

Standard

Histopathologic features of ovarian borderline tumors are not predictive of clinical outcome. / Avril, Stefanie; Hahn, Ellen; Specht, Katja; Hauptmann, Steffen; Höss, Cornelia; Kiechle, Marion; Höfler, Heinz; Schmalfeldt, Barbara.

In: GYNECOL ONCOL, Vol. 127, No. 3, 12.2012, p. 516-24.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Avril, S, Hahn, E, Specht, K, Hauptmann, S, Höss, C, Kiechle, M, Höfler, H & Schmalfeldt, B 2012, 'Histopathologic features of ovarian borderline tumors are not predictive of clinical outcome', GYNECOL ONCOL, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 516-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.027

APA

Avril, S., Hahn, E., Specht, K., Hauptmann, S., Höss, C., Kiechle, M., Höfler, H., & Schmalfeldt, B. (2012). Histopathologic features of ovarian borderline tumors are not predictive of clinical outcome. GYNECOL ONCOL, 127(3), 516-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.027

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{75a0c09f977542d3baf3b3a77be3376c,
title = "Histopathologic features of ovarian borderline tumors are not predictive of clinical outcome",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: Ovarian borderline tumors (BOTs) generally have an excellent prognosis, although recurrences and malignant transformation can occur. Our aim was to compare clinicopathologic features of BOT with clinical outcome.METHODS: In seventy consecutive BOTs clinicopathologic parameters, tumor cell proliferation (Ki67) and in selected cases KRAS, BRAF and p53 mutational status were analyzed with recurrence-free and overall survival as the endpoints.RESULTS: Sixty-one (87%) patients presented with FIGO stage I, 3 stage II, and 6 stage III. Thirty-four patients had serous and 36 mucinous BOT (30 intestinal and 6 endocervical subtypes). Non-invasive peritoneal implants occurred in 9 patients, and no invasive implants were observed. Recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 91% and 99%, respectively, at a mean follow-up of 63 months. Disease recurrence occurred in 6 cases (all FIGO stage I) including 3 serous, 1 mucinous-intestinal, and 2 mucinous-endocervical subtypes. Mean time to recurrence was 27 months (range 8-68). The recurrence rate following fertility-conserving surgery was 31% (5/16) compared to 2% (1/54) after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Neither peritoneal implants (9/70), micropapillary pattern (2/34), microinvasion (4/70), nor increased tumor cell proliferation was associated with a higher recurrence rate. The frequency of KRAS or BRAF mutations was 50% (3/6 recurrences and 3/6 controls; 4 KRAS, 2 BRAF mutations). No p53 mutations (0/12) were detected in primary or recurrent BOTs.CONCLUSIONS: Histopathologic parameters were not predictive of BOT recurrence including previously suggested risk factors such as micropapillary pattern and microinvasion. However, fertility-conserving surgery and incomplete surgical staging were associated with a higher risk for recurrence.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cell Proliferation, Female, Genes, p53, Humans, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Neoplasm Staging, Ovarian Neoplasms, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, ras Proteins",
author = "Stefanie Avril and Ellen Hahn and Katja Specht and Steffen Hauptmann and Cornelia H{\"o}ss and Marion Kiechle and Heinz H{\"o}fler and Barbara Schmalfeldt",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2012",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.027",
language = "English",
volume = "127",
pages = "516--24",
journal = "GYNECOL ONCOL",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Histopathologic features of ovarian borderline tumors are not predictive of clinical outcome

AU - Avril, Stefanie

AU - Hahn, Ellen

AU - Specht, Katja

AU - Hauptmann, Steffen

AU - Höss, Cornelia

AU - Kiechle, Marion

AU - Höfler, Heinz

AU - Schmalfeldt, Barbara

N1 - Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Ovarian borderline tumors (BOTs) generally have an excellent prognosis, although recurrences and malignant transformation can occur. Our aim was to compare clinicopathologic features of BOT with clinical outcome.METHODS: In seventy consecutive BOTs clinicopathologic parameters, tumor cell proliferation (Ki67) and in selected cases KRAS, BRAF and p53 mutational status were analyzed with recurrence-free and overall survival as the endpoints.RESULTS: Sixty-one (87%) patients presented with FIGO stage I, 3 stage II, and 6 stage III. Thirty-four patients had serous and 36 mucinous BOT (30 intestinal and 6 endocervical subtypes). Non-invasive peritoneal implants occurred in 9 patients, and no invasive implants were observed. Recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 91% and 99%, respectively, at a mean follow-up of 63 months. Disease recurrence occurred in 6 cases (all FIGO stage I) including 3 serous, 1 mucinous-intestinal, and 2 mucinous-endocervical subtypes. Mean time to recurrence was 27 months (range 8-68). The recurrence rate following fertility-conserving surgery was 31% (5/16) compared to 2% (1/54) after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Neither peritoneal implants (9/70), micropapillary pattern (2/34), microinvasion (4/70), nor increased tumor cell proliferation was associated with a higher recurrence rate. The frequency of KRAS or BRAF mutations was 50% (3/6 recurrences and 3/6 controls; 4 KRAS, 2 BRAF mutations). No p53 mutations (0/12) were detected in primary or recurrent BOTs.CONCLUSIONS: Histopathologic parameters were not predictive of BOT recurrence including previously suggested risk factors such as micropapillary pattern and microinvasion. However, fertility-conserving surgery and incomplete surgical staging were associated with a higher risk for recurrence.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Ovarian borderline tumors (BOTs) generally have an excellent prognosis, although recurrences and malignant transformation can occur. Our aim was to compare clinicopathologic features of BOT with clinical outcome.METHODS: In seventy consecutive BOTs clinicopathologic parameters, tumor cell proliferation (Ki67) and in selected cases KRAS, BRAF and p53 mutational status were analyzed with recurrence-free and overall survival as the endpoints.RESULTS: Sixty-one (87%) patients presented with FIGO stage I, 3 stage II, and 6 stage III. Thirty-four patients had serous and 36 mucinous BOT (30 intestinal and 6 endocervical subtypes). Non-invasive peritoneal implants occurred in 9 patients, and no invasive implants were observed. Recurrence-free and overall survival rates were 91% and 99%, respectively, at a mean follow-up of 63 months. Disease recurrence occurred in 6 cases (all FIGO stage I) including 3 serous, 1 mucinous-intestinal, and 2 mucinous-endocervical subtypes. Mean time to recurrence was 27 months (range 8-68). The recurrence rate following fertility-conserving surgery was 31% (5/16) compared to 2% (1/54) after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Neither peritoneal implants (9/70), micropapillary pattern (2/34), microinvasion (4/70), nor increased tumor cell proliferation was associated with a higher recurrence rate. The frequency of KRAS or BRAF mutations was 50% (3/6 recurrences and 3/6 controls; 4 KRAS, 2 BRAF mutations). No p53 mutations (0/12) were detected in primary or recurrent BOTs.CONCLUSIONS: Histopathologic parameters were not predictive of BOT recurrence including previously suggested risk factors such as micropapillary pattern and microinvasion. However, fertility-conserving surgery and incomplete surgical staging were associated with a higher risk for recurrence.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Cell Proliferation

KW - Female

KW - Genes, p53

KW - Humans

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Mutation

KW - Neoplasm Invasiveness

KW - Neoplasm Recurrence, Local

KW - Neoplasm Staging

KW - Ovarian Neoplasms

KW - Proto-Oncogene Proteins

KW - Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

KW - Survival Rate

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - ras Proteins

U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.027

DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.027

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 23000388

VL - 127

SP - 516

EP - 524

JO - GYNECOL ONCOL

JF - GYNECOL ONCOL

SN - 0090-8258

IS - 3

ER -