Hemispheric asymmetry and somatotopy of afferent inhibition in healthy humans.

Standard

Hemispheric asymmetry and somatotopy of afferent inhibition in healthy humans. / Helmich, R C G; Bäumer, Tobias; Siebner, H R; Bloem, B R; Münchau, A.

In: EXP BRAIN RES, Vol. 167, No. 2, 2, 2005, p. 211-219.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Helmich, RCG, Bäumer, T, Siebner, HR, Bloem, BR & Münchau, A 2005, 'Hemispheric asymmetry and somatotopy of afferent inhibition in healthy humans.', EXP BRAIN RES, vol. 167, no. 2, 2, pp. 211-219. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16034577?dopt=Citation>

APA

Helmich, R. C. G., Bäumer, T., Siebner, H. R., Bloem, B. R., & Münchau, A. (2005). Hemispheric asymmetry and somatotopy of afferent inhibition in healthy humans. EXP BRAIN RES, 167(2), 211-219. [2]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16034577?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Helmich RCG, Bäumer T, Siebner HR, Bloem BR, Münchau A. Hemispheric asymmetry and somatotopy of afferent inhibition in healthy humans. EXP BRAIN RES. 2005;167(2):211-219. 2.

Bibtex

@article{c2f2d3bb60a94c0da571dbb7daeecf3d,
title = "Hemispheric asymmetry and somatotopy of afferent inhibition in healthy humans.",
abstract = "A conditioning electrical stimulus to a digital nerve can inhibit the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in adjacent hand muscles elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) when given 25-50 ms before the TMS pulse. This is referred to as short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI). We studied inter-hemispheric differences (Experiment 1) and within-limb somatotopy (Experiment 2) of SAI in healthy right-handers. In Experiment 1, conditioning electrical pulses were applied to the right or left index finger (D2) and MEPs were recorded from relaxed first dorsal interosseus (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles ipsilateral to the conditioning stimulus. We found that SAI was more pronounced in right hand muscles. In Experiment 2, electrical stimulation was applied to the right D2 and MEPs were recorded from ipsilateral FDI, extensor digitorum communis (EDC) and biceps brachii (BB) muscles. The amount of SAI did not differ between FDI, EDC and BB muscles. These data demonstrate inter-hemispheric differences in the processing of cutaneous input from the hand, with stronger SAI in the dominant left hemisphere. We also found that SAI occurred not only in hand muscles adjacent to electrical digital stimulation, but also in distant hand and forearm and also proximal arm muscles. This suggests that SAI induced by electrical D2 stimulation is not focal and somatotopically specific, but a more widespread inhibitory phenomenon.",
author = "Helmich, {R C G} and Tobias B{\"a}umer and Siebner, {H R} and Bloem, {B R} and A M{\"u}nchau",
year = "2005",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "167",
pages = "211--219",
journal = "EXP BRAIN RES",
issn = "0014-4819",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hemispheric asymmetry and somatotopy of afferent inhibition in healthy humans.

AU - Helmich, R C G

AU - Bäumer, Tobias

AU - Siebner, H R

AU - Bloem, B R

AU - Münchau, A

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - A conditioning electrical stimulus to a digital nerve can inhibit the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in adjacent hand muscles elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) when given 25-50 ms before the TMS pulse. This is referred to as short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI). We studied inter-hemispheric differences (Experiment 1) and within-limb somatotopy (Experiment 2) of SAI in healthy right-handers. In Experiment 1, conditioning electrical pulses were applied to the right or left index finger (D2) and MEPs were recorded from relaxed first dorsal interosseus (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles ipsilateral to the conditioning stimulus. We found that SAI was more pronounced in right hand muscles. In Experiment 2, electrical stimulation was applied to the right D2 and MEPs were recorded from ipsilateral FDI, extensor digitorum communis (EDC) and biceps brachii (BB) muscles. The amount of SAI did not differ between FDI, EDC and BB muscles. These data demonstrate inter-hemispheric differences in the processing of cutaneous input from the hand, with stronger SAI in the dominant left hemisphere. We also found that SAI occurred not only in hand muscles adjacent to electrical digital stimulation, but also in distant hand and forearm and also proximal arm muscles. This suggests that SAI induced by electrical D2 stimulation is not focal and somatotopically specific, but a more widespread inhibitory phenomenon.

AB - A conditioning electrical stimulus to a digital nerve can inhibit the motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in adjacent hand muscles elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) when given 25-50 ms before the TMS pulse. This is referred to as short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI). We studied inter-hemispheric differences (Experiment 1) and within-limb somatotopy (Experiment 2) of SAI in healthy right-handers. In Experiment 1, conditioning electrical pulses were applied to the right or left index finger (D2) and MEPs were recorded from relaxed first dorsal interosseus (FDI) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscles ipsilateral to the conditioning stimulus. We found that SAI was more pronounced in right hand muscles. In Experiment 2, electrical stimulation was applied to the right D2 and MEPs were recorded from ipsilateral FDI, extensor digitorum communis (EDC) and biceps brachii (BB) muscles. The amount of SAI did not differ between FDI, EDC and BB muscles. These data demonstrate inter-hemispheric differences in the processing of cutaneous input from the hand, with stronger SAI in the dominant left hemisphere. We also found that SAI occurred not only in hand muscles adjacent to electrical digital stimulation, but also in distant hand and forearm and also proximal arm muscles. This suggests that SAI induced by electrical D2 stimulation is not focal and somatotopically specific, but a more widespread inhibitory phenomenon.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 167

SP - 211

EP - 219

JO - EXP BRAIN RES

JF - EXP BRAIN RES

SN - 0014-4819

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -