Heart Rhythm Society Atrial Fibrillation Centers of Excellence Study: A survey analysis of stakeholder practices, needs, and barriers

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heart Rhythm Society Atrial Fibrillation Centers of Excellence Study: A survey analysis of stakeholder practices, needs, and barriers

AU - Sandhu, Roopinder K

AU - Seiler, Amber

AU - Johnson, Colleen J

AU - Bunch, T Jared

AU - Deering, Thomas F

AU - Deneke, Thomas

AU - Kirchhof, Paulus

AU - Natale, Andrea

AU - Piccini, Jonathan P

AU - Russo, Andrea M

AU - Hills, Mellanie True

AU - Varosy, Paul D

AU - Araia, Almaz

AU - Smith, Anne Marie

AU - Freeman, James

N1 - Copyright © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/6

Y1 - 2022/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: An integrated, coordinated, and patient-centered approach to atrial fibrillation (AF) care delivery may improve outcomes and reduce cost.OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding from key stakeholder groups on current practices, needs, and potential barriers to implementing optimal integrated AF care.METHODS: A series of comprehensive questionnaires were designed by the Heart Rhythm Society Atrial Fibrillation Centers of Excellence (CoE) Task Force to conduct surveys with physicians, advanced practice professionals, patients, and hospital administrators. Data collected focused on the following areas: access to care, stroke prevention, education, AF quality improvement, and AF CoE needs and barriers. Survey responses were collated and analyzed by the Task Force.RESULTS: The surveys identified 5 major unmet needs: (1) Standardized protocols, order sets, or care pathways in the emergency department or inpatient setting were uncommon (36%-42%). (2) All stakeholders agreed stroke prevention was a top priority; however, prior bleeding or risk of bleeding was the most frequent barrier for initiation. (3) Patients indicated that education on modifiable causes, AF-related complications, and lowering stroke risk is most important. (4) Less than half (43%) of the health care systems track patients with AF or treatment status. Patients reported that stroke and heart failure prevention and access to procedures were priority areas for an AF CoE. The most common barriers to implementing AF CoE identified by clinicians were administrative support (69%) and cost (52%); administrators reported physical space (43%).CONCLUSION: On the basis of the findings of this study, the Task Force identified high priority areas to develop initiatives to aid the implementation of AF CoE.

AB - BACKGROUND: An integrated, coordinated, and patient-centered approach to atrial fibrillation (AF) care delivery may improve outcomes and reduce cost.OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to gain a better understanding from key stakeholder groups on current practices, needs, and potential barriers to implementing optimal integrated AF care.METHODS: A series of comprehensive questionnaires were designed by the Heart Rhythm Society Atrial Fibrillation Centers of Excellence (CoE) Task Force to conduct surveys with physicians, advanced practice professionals, patients, and hospital administrators. Data collected focused on the following areas: access to care, stroke prevention, education, AF quality improvement, and AF CoE needs and barriers. Survey responses were collated and analyzed by the Task Force.RESULTS: The surveys identified 5 major unmet needs: (1) Standardized protocols, order sets, or care pathways in the emergency department or inpatient setting were uncommon (36%-42%). (2) All stakeholders agreed stroke prevention was a top priority; however, prior bleeding or risk of bleeding was the most frequent barrier for initiation. (3) Patients indicated that education on modifiable causes, AF-related complications, and lowering stroke risk is most important. (4) Less than half (43%) of the health care systems track patients with AF or treatment status. Patients reported that stroke and heart failure prevention and access to procedures were priority areas for an AF CoE. The most common barriers to implementing AF CoE identified by clinicians were administrative support (69%) and cost (52%); administrators reported physical space (43%).CONCLUSION: On the basis of the findings of this study, the Task Force identified high priority areas to develop initiatives to aid the implementation of AF CoE.

KW - Anticoagulants/adverse effects

KW - Atrial Fibrillation/complications

KW - Hemorrhage/chemically induced

KW - Humans

KW - Stroke/epidemiology

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

U2 - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.02.022

DO - 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.02.022

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35428582

VL - 19

SP - 1039

EP - 1048

JO - HEART RHYTHM

JF - HEART RHYTHM

SN - 1547-5271

IS - 6

ER -