Genomic Classification and Individualized Prognosis in Multiple Myeloma

  • Francesco Maura (Shared first author)
  • Arjun Raj Rajanna (Shared first author)
  • Bachisio Ziccheddu (Shared first author)
  • Alexandra M Poos (Shared first author)
  • Andriy Derkach
  • Kylee Maclachlan
  • Michael Durante
  • Benjamin Diamond
  • Marios Papadimitriou
  • Faith Davies
  • Eileen M Boyle
  • Brian Walker
  • Malin Hultcrantz
  • Ariosto Silva
  • Oliver Hampton
  • Jamie K Teer
  • Erin M Siegel
  • Niccolò Bolli
  • Graham H Jackson
  • Martin Kaiser
  • Charlotte Pawlyn
  • Gordon Cook
  • Dickran Kazandjian
  • Caleb Stein
  • Marta Chesi
  • Leif Bergsagel
  • Elias K Mai
  • Hartmut Goldschmidt
  • Katja C Weisel
  • Roland Fenk
  • Marc S Raab
  • Fritz Van Rhee
  • Saad Usmani (Shared last author)
  • Kenneth H Shain (Shared last author)
  • Niels Weinhold (Shared last author)
  • Gareth Morgan (Shared last author)
  • Ola Landgren (Shared last author)

Related Research units

Abstract

PURPOSE: Outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) are heterogenous, with overall survival (OS) ranging from months to over 10 years.

METHODS: To decipher and predict the molecular and clinical heterogeneity of NDMM, we assembled a series of 1,933 patients with available clinical, genomic, and therapeutic data.

RESULTS: Leveraging a comprehensive catalog of genomic drivers, we identified 12 groups, expanding on previous gene expression-based molecular classifications. To build a model predicting individualized risk in NDMM (IRMMa), we integrated clinical, genomic, and treatment variables. To correct for time-dependent variables, including high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT), and maintenance therapy, a multi-state model was designed. The IRMMa model accuracy was significantly higher than all comparator prognostic models, with a c-index for OS of 0.726, compared with International Staging System (ISS; 0.61), revised-ISS (0.572), and R2-ISS (0.625). Integral to model accuracy was 20 genomic features, including 1q21 gain/amp, del 1p, TP53 loss, NSD2 translocations, APOBEC mutational signatures, and copy-number signatures (reflecting the complex structural variant chromothripsis). IRMMa accuracy and superiority compared with other prognostic models were validated on 256 patients enrolled in the GMMG-HD6 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02495922) clinical trial. Individualized patient risks were significantly affected across the 12 genomic groups by different treatment strategies (ie, treatment variance), which was used to identify patients for whom HDM-ASCT is particularly effective versus patients for whom the impact is limited.

CONCLUSION: Integrating clinical, demographic, genomic, and therapeutic data, to our knowledge, we have developed the first individualized risk-prediction model enabling personally tailored therapeutic decisions for patients with NDMM.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN0732-183X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10.04.2024
PubMed 38194610