Gender-specific reference values for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I in well-phenotyped healthy individuals and validity of high-sensitivity assay designation

Standard

Gender-specific reference values for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I in well-phenotyped healthy individuals and validity of high-sensitivity assay designation. / Giannitsis, Evangelos; Mueller-Hennessen, Matthias; Zeller, Tanja; Schuebler, Anna; Aurich, Matthias; Biener, Moritz; Vafaie, Mehrshad; Stoyanov, Kiril M; Ochs, Marco; Riffel, Johannes; Mereles, Derliz; Blankenberg, Stefan; Katus, Hugo A.

In: CLIN BIOCHEM, Vol. 78, 04.2020, p. 18-24.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Giannitsis, E, Mueller-Hennessen, M, Zeller, T, Schuebler, A, Aurich, M, Biener, M, Vafaie, M, Stoyanov, KM, Ochs, M, Riffel, J, Mereles, D, Blankenberg, S & Katus, HA 2020, 'Gender-specific reference values for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I in well-phenotyped healthy individuals and validity of high-sensitivity assay designation', CLIN BIOCHEM, vol. 78, pp. 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.11.013

APA

Giannitsis, E., Mueller-Hennessen, M., Zeller, T., Schuebler, A., Aurich, M., Biener, M., Vafaie, M., Stoyanov, K. M., Ochs, M., Riffel, J., Mereles, D., Blankenberg, S., & Katus, H. A. (2020). Gender-specific reference values for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I in well-phenotyped healthy individuals and validity of high-sensitivity assay designation. CLIN BIOCHEM, 78, 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.11.013

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{595826b700df443bbc35c74f6658a690,
title = "Gender-specific reference values for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I in well-phenotyped healthy individuals and validity of high-sensitivity assay designation",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To determine gender-specific reference limits of high-sensitivity (hs) cardiac troponins (cTn) and validity of hs assay designation for both genders.METHODS: After screening with a questionnaire, 827 presumably healthy individuals were further selected based on clinical criteria (n = 740), clinical criteria plus cardiac imaging including stress magnetic resonance imaging or stress echocardiography (n = 726), and extended cardio-pulmonary parameters (n = 626). Blood samples were measured with hs-cTnT (Roche Diagnostics) on a cobas e602 analyzer as well as hs-cTnI (Abbott Diagnostics) on an ARCHITECTi2000SR. The impact of health definition, statistical methods, instrument selection and limit of detection (LoD) on overall and gender-specific 99th percentiles was assessed.RESULTS: Median age was 56 years (50.9% female) for the total study cohort. 99th percentiles for females and males ranged between 13.1 and 13.3 ng/L and 16.8-19.9 ng/L for hs-cTnT as well as 10.3-12.5 ng/L and 27.4-29.7 ng/L for hs-cTnI depending on health definition. Utilization of stricter health definition criteria reduced the difference of the gender-specific 99th percentiles between males and females for hs-cTnT to 3.7 ng/L (males 16.8 ng/L, females 13.1 ng/L), whereas the difference rather increased for hs-cTnI to 19.4 ng/L (males 29.7 ng/L, females 10.3 ng/L). Values > LoD could be measured in the majority of males and females using hs-TnT (81.4-83.3% and 96.5-96.9%, respectively). In contrast, values > LoD could not be observed in the majority of females using hs-cTnI (38.4-41.1%).CONCLUSIONS: In a well-phenotyped healthy cohort, reference values for hs-cTnT were slightly higher, whereas hs-cTnI cut-offs were considerably lower than previously observed. Gender differences were more pronounced in hs-cTnI than in hs-cTnT and were further reduced for hs-cTnT by application of stricter health definition criteria. Contrary to hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT fulfilled criteria for hs designation for both genders.",
keywords = "Age Factors, Aged, Biomarkers/blood, Blood Chemical Analysis/standards, Female, Humans, Limit of Detection, Male, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Troponin I/blood, Troponin T/blood",
author = "Evangelos Giannitsis and Matthias Mueller-Hennessen and Tanja Zeller and Anna Schuebler and Matthias Aurich and Moritz Biener and Mehrshad Vafaie and Stoyanov, {Kiril M} and Marco Ochs and Johannes Riffel and Derliz Mereles and Stefan Blankenberg and Katus, {Hugo A}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.11.013",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "18--24",
journal = "CLIN BIOCHEM",
issn = "0009-9120",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gender-specific reference values for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I in well-phenotyped healthy individuals and validity of high-sensitivity assay designation

AU - Giannitsis, Evangelos

AU - Mueller-Hennessen, Matthias

AU - Zeller, Tanja

AU - Schuebler, Anna

AU - Aurich, Matthias

AU - Biener, Moritz

AU - Vafaie, Mehrshad

AU - Stoyanov, Kiril M

AU - Ochs, Marco

AU - Riffel, Johannes

AU - Mereles, Derliz

AU - Blankenberg, Stefan

AU - Katus, Hugo A

N1 - Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2020/4

Y1 - 2020/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine gender-specific reference limits of high-sensitivity (hs) cardiac troponins (cTn) and validity of hs assay designation for both genders.METHODS: After screening with a questionnaire, 827 presumably healthy individuals were further selected based on clinical criteria (n = 740), clinical criteria plus cardiac imaging including stress magnetic resonance imaging or stress echocardiography (n = 726), and extended cardio-pulmonary parameters (n = 626). Blood samples were measured with hs-cTnT (Roche Diagnostics) on a cobas e602 analyzer as well as hs-cTnI (Abbott Diagnostics) on an ARCHITECTi2000SR. The impact of health definition, statistical methods, instrument selection and limit of detection (LoD) on overall and gender-specific 99th percentiles was assessed.RESULTS: Median age was 56 years (50.9% female) for the total study cohort. 99th percentiles for females and males ranged between 13.1 and 13.3 ng/L and 16.8-19.9 ng/L for hs-cTnT as well as 10.3-12.5 ng/L and 27.4-29.7 ng/L for hs-cTnI depending on health definition. Utilization of stricter health definition criteria reduced the difference of the gender-specific 99th percentiles between males and females for hs-cTnT to 3.7 ng/L (males 16.8 ng/L, females 13.1 ng/L), whereas the difference rather increased for hs-cTnI to 19.4 ng/L (males 29.7 ng/L, females 10.3 ng/L). Values > LoD could be measured in the majority of males and females using hs-TnT (81.4-83.3% and 96.5-96.9%, respectively). In contrast, values > LoD could not be observed in the majority of females using hs-cTnI (38.4-41.1%).CONCLUSIONS: In a well-phenotyped healthy cohort, reference values for hs-cTnT were slightly higher, whereas hs-cTnI cut-offs were considerably lower than previously observed. Gender differences were more pronounced in hs-cTnI than in hs-cTnT and were further reduced for hs-cTnT by application of stricter health definition criteria. Contrary to hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT fulfilled criteria for hs designation for both genders.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To determine gender-specific reference limits of high-sensitivity (hs) cardiac troponins (cTn) and validity of hs assay designation for both genders.METHODS: After screening with a questionnaire, 827 presumably healthy individuals were further selected based on clinical criteria (n = 740), clinical criteria plus cardiac imaging including stress magnetic resonance imaging or stress echocardiography (n = 726), and extended cardio-pulmonary parameters (n = 626). Blood samples were measured with hs-cTnT (Roche Diagnostics) on a cobas e602 analyzer as well as hs-cTnI (Abbott Diagnostics) on an ARCHITECTi2000SR. The impact of health definition, statistical methods, instrument selection and limit of detection (LoD) on overall and gender-specific 99th percentiles was assessed.RESULTS: Median age was 56 years (50.9% female) for the total study cohort. 99th percentiles for females and males ranged between 13.1 and 13.3 ng/L and 16.8-19.9 ng/L for hs-cTnT as well as 10.3-12.5 ng/L and 27.4-29.7 ng/L for hs-cTnI depending on health definition. Utilization of stricter health definition criteria reduced the difference of the gender-specific 99th percentiles between males and females for hs-cTnT to 3.7 ng/L (males 16.8 ng/L, females 13.1 ng/L), whereas the difference rather increased for hs-cTnI to 19.4 ng/L (males 29.7 ng/L, females 10.3 ng/L). Values > LoD could be measured in the majority of males and females using hs-TnT (81.4-83.3% and 96.5-96.9%, respectively). In contrast, values > LoD could not be observed in the majority of females using hs-cTnI (38.4-41.1%).CONCLUSIONS: In a well-phenotyped healthy cohort, reference values for hs-cTnT were slightly higher, whereas hs-cTnI cut-offs were considerably lower than previously observed. Gender differences were more pronounced in hs-cTnI than in hs-cTnT and were further reduced for hs-cTnT by application of stricter health definition criteria. Contrary to hs-cTnI, hs-cTnT fulfilled criteria for hs designation for both genders.

KW - Age Factors

KW - Aged

KW - Biomarkers/blood

KW - Blood Chemical Analysis/standards

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Limit of Detection

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Phenotype

KW - Reference Values

KW - Sensitivity and Specificity

KW - Sex Factors

KW - Troponin I/blood

KW - Troponin T/blood

U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.11.013

DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.11.013

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 31786204

VL - 78

SP - 18

EP - 24

JO - CLIN BIOCHEM

JF - CLIN BIOCHEM

SN - 0009-9120

ER -