Gemcitabine and mitomycin C in advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience.

Standard

Gemcitabine and mitomycin C in advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. / Tuinmann, Gert; Hegewisch-Becker, Susanna; Zschaber, Reinhart; Kehr, Andreas; Schulz, Juliane; Hossfeld, Dieter K.

In: ANTI-CANCER DRUG, Vol. 15, No. 6, 6, 2004, p. 575-579.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Tuinmann, G, Hegewisch-Becker, S, Zschaber, R, Kehr, A, Schulz, J & Hossfeld, DK 2004, 'Gemcitabine and mitomycin C in advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience.', ANTI-CANCER DRUG, vol. 15, no. 6, 6, pp. 575-579. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15205599?dopt=Citation>

APA

Tuinmann, G., Hegewisch-Becker, S., Zschaber, R., Kehr, A., Schulz, J., & Hossfeld, D. K. (2004). Gemcitabine and mitomycin C in advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. ANTI-CANCER DRUG, 15(6), 575-579. [6]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15205599?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Tuinmann G, Hegewisch-Becker S, Zschaber R, Kehr A, Schulz J, Hossfeld DK. Gemcitabine and mitomycin C in advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. ANTI-CANCER DRUG. 2004;15(6):575-579. 6.

Bibtex

@article{2fb839cf3192444ba12931b3ac283114,
title = "Gemcitabine and mitomycin C in advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience.",
abstract = "Despite chemotherapy, median survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) remains poor. Gemcitabine (GEM) remains standard treatment. Numerous phase II studies have suggested that combination therapies may improve response rates. Mitomycin C (MMC) when used as a single agent may have response rates comparable to other cytotoxic drugs. Therefore, MMC could be an interesting drug to be combined with GEM. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of GEM combined with MMC in patients with APC. Between April 1997 and January 2002, 55 consecutive patients were treated with GEM 800 mg/m2 i.v., days 1, 8 and 15, and MMC 8 mg/m2 i.v., day 1, every 4 weeks in an outpatient setting. Patient characteristics included: M/F 34/21, median age of 58 years, ECOG PS 0-2. A median of 3 cycles was administered. The most frequent toxicity was thrombocytopenia grade III/IV in 54% of patients. Ten patients experienced dyspnea+/-X-ray-proven pneumonitis (n=2). One of these patients developed a hemolytic uremic syndrome after the sixth application of MMC. There was one early death as a consequence of a stroke. The objective response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval: 17-43). Eighteen patients had stable disease resulting in an overall tumor growth control of 62%. Time to progression was 4.7 months and median overall survival was 7.25 months. We conclude that, except for thrombocytopenia, the combination of GEM and MMC is well tolerated. These results compare favorably to single-agent chemotherapy with GEM or the combination of 5-fluorouracil plus MMC. Furthermore, this regimen is cost-effective and, since it can be given on an outpatient basis, contributes to the quality of life.",
author = "Gert Tuinmann and Susanna Hegewisch-Becker and Reinhart Zschaber and Andreas Kehr and Juliane Schulz and Hossfeld, {Dieter K}",
year = "2004",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "15",
pages = "575--579",
journal = "ANTI-CANCER DRUG",
issn = "0959-4973",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gemcitabine and mitomycin C in advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience.

AU - Tuinmann, Gert

AU - Hegewisch-Becker, Susanna

AU - Zschaber, Reinhart

AU - Kehr, Andreas

AU - Schulz, Juliane

AU - Hossfeld, Dieter K

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Despite chemotherapy, median survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) remains poor. Gemcitabine (GEM) remains standard treatment. Numerous phase II studies have suggested that combination therapies may improve response rates. Mitomycin C (MMC) when used as a single agent may have response rates comparable to other cytotoxic drugs. Therefore, MMC could be an interesting drug to be combined with GEM. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of GEM combined with MMC in patients with APC. Between April 1997 and January 2002, 55 consecutive patients were treated with GEM 800 mg/m2 i.v., days 1, 8 and 15, and MMC 8 mg/m2 i.v., day 1, every 4 weeks in an outpatient setting. Patient characteristics included: M/F 34/21, median age of 58 years, ECOG PS 0-2. A median of 3 cycles was administered. The most frequent toxicity was thrombocytopenia grade III/IV in 54% of patients. Ten patients experienced dyspnea+/-X-ray-proven pneumonitis (n=2). One of these patients developed a hemolytic uremic syndrome after the sixth application of MMC. There was one early death as a consequence of a stroke. The objective response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval: 17-43). Eighteen patients had stable disease resulting in an overall tumor growth control of 62%. Time to progression was 4.7 months and median overall survival was 7.25 months. We conclude that, except for thrombocytopenia, the combination of GEM and MMC is well tolerated. These results compare favorably to single-agent chemotherapy with GEM or the combination of 5-fluorouracil plus MMC. Furthermore, this regimen is cost-effective and, since it can be given on an outpatient basis, contributes to the quality of life.

AB - Despite chemotherapy, median survival of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) remains poor. Gemcitabine (GEM) remains standard treatment. Numerous phase II studies have suggested that combination therapies may improve response rates. Mitomycin C (MMC) when used as a single agent may have response rates comparable to other cytotoxic drugs. Therefore, MMC could be an interesting drug to be combined with GEM. This study aimed to assess the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of GEM combined with MMC in patients with APC. Between April 1997 and January 2002, 55 consecutive patients were treated with GEM 800 mg/m2 i.v., days 1, 8 and 15, and MMC 8 mg/m2 i.v., day 1, every 4 weeks in an outpatient setting. Patient characteristics included: M/F 34/21, median age of 58 years, ECOG PS 0-2. A median of 3 cycles was administered. The most frequent toxicity was thrombocytopenia grade III/IV in 54% of patients. Ten patients experienced dyspnea+/-X-ray-proven pneumonitis (n=2). One of these patients developed a hemolytic uremic syndrome after the sixth application of MMC. There was one early death as a consequence of a stroke. The objective response rate was 29% (95% confidence interval: 17-43). Eighteen patients had stable disease resulting in an overall tumor growth control of 62%. Time to progression was 4.7 months and median overall survival was 7.25 months. We conclude that, except for thrombocytopenia, the combination of GEM and MMC is well tolerated. These results compare favorably to single-agent chemotherapy with GEM or the combination of 5-fluorouracil plus MMC. Furthermore, this regimen is cost-effective and, since it can be given on an outpatient basis, contributes to the quality of life.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 15

SP - 575

EP - 579

JO - ANTI-CANCER DRUG

JF - ANTI-CANCER DRUG

SN - 0959-4973

IS - 6

M1 - 6

ER -