Futile Recanalization With Poor Clinical Outcome Is Associated With Increased Edema Volume After Ischemic Stroke

TY - JOUR

T1 - Futile Recanalization With Poor Clinical Outcome Is Associated With Increased Edema Volume After Ischemic Stroke

AU - Nawabi, Jawed

AU - Flottmann, Fabian

AU - Hanning, Uta

AU - Bechstein, Matthias

AU - Schön, Gerhard

AU - Kemmling, Andre

AU - Fiehler, Jens

AU - Broocks, Gabriel

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - PURPOSE: Futile recanalization with poor clinical outcome after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is poorly understood. Recently, vessel recanalization has been associated with reduced ischemic brain edema in patients with good clinical outcome. As edema volume (EV) may be quantified in computed tomography (CT), we hypothesized that higher EV after revascularization predicts futile recanalization with poor outcome.METHODS: In this observational study, 67 ischemic stroke patients with M1 middle cerebral artery occlusion fulfilled all inclusion criteria and were analyzed. All patients received successful endovascular recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale 2b/3) and subsequent follow-up CT 24 hours later. Edema volume within the infarct lesion was calculated in follow-up CT applying lesion water uptake quantification and was used to predict clinical outcome (Modified Rankin Scale [mRS] after 90 days) compared with infarct volume.RESULTS: The median EV after thrombectomy was 1.6 mL (interquartile range, 0.2-4.2 mL) in patients with mRS 0 to 4 and 8.6 mL (interquartile range, 2.0-49.8 mL) in patients with mRS 5 to 6 (P = 0.0008). In regression analysis, an EV increase of 1 mL was associated with an 8.0% increased likelihood of poor outcome (95% confidence interval, 2.8%-15.4%; P = 0.008). Based on univariate receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, absolute EV over 4.2 mL predicted poor outcome (mRS 5-6) with good discriminative power (area under curve, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.84; specificity, 77%; sensitivity, 68%). In comparison, the area under curve for infarct volume was 0.68.CONCLUSIONS: Elevated EV after endovascular thrombectomy was associated with poor clinical outcome and may indicate futile recanalization.

AB - PURPOSE: Futile recanalization with poor clinical outcome after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke is poorly understood. Recently, vessel recanalization has been associated with reduced ischemic brain edema in patients with good clinical outcome. As edema volume (EV) may be quantified in computed tomography (CT), we hypothesized that higher EV after revascularization predicts futile recanalization with poor outcome.METHODS: In this observational study, 67 ischemic stroke patients with M1 middle cerebral artery occlusion fulfilled all inclusion criteria and were analyzed. All patients received successful endovascular recanalization (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction scale 2b/3) and subsequent follow-up CT 24 hours later. Edema volume within the infarct lesion was calculated in follow-up CT applying lesion water uptake quantification and was used to predict clinical outcome (Modified Rankin Scale [mRS] after 90 days) compared with infarct volume.RESULTS: The median EV after thrombectomy was 1.6 mL (interquartile range, 0.2-4.2 mL) in patients with mRS 0 to 4 and 8.6 mL (interquartile range, 2.0-49.8 mL) in patients with mRS 5 to 6 (P = 0.0008). In regression analysis, an EV increase of 1 mL was associated with an 8.0% increased likelihood of poor outcome (95% confidence interval, 2.8%-15.4%; P = 0.008). Based on univariate receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, absolute EV over 4.2 mL predicted poor outcome (mRS 5-6) with good discriminative power (area under curve, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.84; specificity, 77%; sensitivity, 68%). In comparison, the area under curve for infarct volume was 0.68.CONCLUSIONS: Elevated EV after endovascular thrombectomy was associated with poor clinical outcome and may indicate futile recanalization.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000539

DO - 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000539

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30562271

VL - 54

SP - 282

EP - 287

JO - INVEST RADIOL

JF - INVEST RADIOL

SN - 0020-9996

IS - 5

ER -