Feasibility of extremely reduced-dose CT of the thoracic spine in human cadavers
Standard
Feasibility of extremely reduced-dose CT of the thoracic spine in human cadavers. / Weinrich, Julius Matthias; Warncke, Malte; Wiese, Nis; Regier, Marc; Tahir, Enver; Heinemann, Axel; Sehner, Susanne; Püschel, Klaus; Adam, Gerhard; Laqmani, Azien.
In: ACTA RADIOL, Vol. 61, No. 8, 08.2020, p. 1034-1041.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility of extremely reduced-dose CT of the thoracic spine in human cadavers
AU - Weinrich, Julius Matthias
AU - Warncke, Malte
AU - Wiese, Nis
AU - Regier, Marc
AU - Tahir, Enver
AU - Heinemann, Axel
AU - Sehner, Susanne
AU - Püschel, Klaus
AU - Adam, Gerhard
AU - Laqmani, Azien
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - BACKGROUND: According to the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle, radiation exposure in computed tomography (CT) should be minimized while maintaining adequate image quality. Dedicated CT protocols combined with iterative reconstruction (IR) can reduce radiation dose and/or improve image quality.PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of extremely reduced-dose (RD) CT of the thoracic spine in human cadavers using a standard-dose (SD) and three different RDCT protocols reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and IR.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The thoracic spines of 11 cadavers were examined using different RDCT protocols with decreasing reference tube currents (RDCT-1: 50 mAs; RDCT-2: 30 mAs; RDCT-3: 10 mAs) at 140 kV. A clinical SDCT (70 mAs, 140 kV) served as reference. Raw data were reconstructed using FBP and two increasing levels of IR (IRL4 and IRL6). Images were evaluated for image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and visibility of anatomical structures according to a 5-point-scale.RESULTS: Regardless of the reconstruction technique, image quality was rated as diagnostically acceptable for all cadavers in SDCT and RDCT-1. Image quality of reconstructions with FBP were generally rated lower. Application of IR improved image quality ratings in SDCT and RDCT. RDCT-2 with IR was the most reduced-dose CT protocol which enabled diagnostically acceptable image quality in all cadavers. Compared to SDCT, RDCT protocols resulted in significantly reduced effective radiation doses (SDCT: 4.1 ± 1.5 mSv; RDCT-1: 2.9 ± 1.1 mSv; 2:1.7 ± 0.6 mSv; 3:0.6 ± 0.1 mSv; P = 0.001).CONCLUSION: Diagnostically acceptable RDCT of the thoracic spine with 1.7 mSv is feasible using IR.
AB - BACKGROUND: According to the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) principle, radiation exposure in computed tomography (CT) should be minimized while maintaining adequate image quality. Dedicated CT protocols combined with iterative reconstruction (IR) can reduce radiation dose and/or improve image quality.PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of extremely reduced-dose (RD) CT of the thoracic spine in human cadavers using a standard-dose (SD) and three different RDCT protocols reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and IR.MATERIAL AND METHODS: The thoracic spines of 11 cadavers were examined using different RDCT protocols with decreasing reference tube currents (RDCT-1: 50 mAs; RDCT-2: 30 mAs; RDCT-3: 10 mAs) at 140 kV. A clinical SDCT (70 mAs, 140 kV) served as reference. Raw data were reconstructed using FBP and two increasing levels of IR (IRL4 and IRL6). Images were evaluated for image quality, diagnostic acceptability, and visibility of anatomical structures according to a 5-point-scale.RESULTS: Regardless of the reconstruction technique, image quality was rated as diagnostically acceptable for all cadavers in SDCT and RDCT-1. Image quality of reconstructions with FBP were generally rated lower. Application of IR improved image quality ratings in SDCT and RDCT. RDCT-2 with IR was the most reduced-dose CT protocol which enabled diagnostically acceptable image quality in all cadavers. Compared to SDCT, RDCT protocols resulted in significantly reduced effective radiation doses (SDCT: 4.1 ± 1.5 mSv; RDCT-1: 2.9 ± 1.1 mSv; 2:1.7 ± 0.6 mSv; 3:0.6 ± 0.1 mSv; P = 0.001).CONCLUSION: Diagnostically acceptable RDCT of the thoracic spine with 1.7 mSv is feasible using IR.
UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0284185119891417?rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dpubmed&url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&journalCode=acrc
U2 - 10.1177/0284185119891417
DO - 10.1177/0284185119891417
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 31840526
VL - 61
SP - 1034
EP - 1041
JO - ACTA RADIOL
JF - ACTA RADIOL
SN - 0284-1851
IS - 8
ER -