Feasibility of a customizable training environment for neurointerventional skills assessment

Standard

Feasibility of a customizable training environment for neurointerventional skills assessment. / Nawka, Marie Teresa; Hanning, Uta; Guerreiro, Helena; Flottmann, Fabian; Van Horn, Noel; Buhk, Jan-Hendrik; Fiehler, Jens; Frölich, Andreas Maximilian.

In: PLOS ONE, Vol. 15, No. 9, 2020, p. e0238952.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b2873d0baaf54cea99e53e86e21cd03b,
title = "Feasibility of a customizable training environment for neurointerventional skills assessment",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To meet increasing demands to train neuroendovascular techniques, we developed a dedicated simulator applying individualized three-dimensional intracranial aneurysm models ('HANNES'; Hamburg Anatomic Neurointerventional Endovascular Simulator). We hypothesized that HANNES provides a realistic and reproducible training environment to practice coil embolization and to exemplify disparities between neurointerventionalists, thus objectively benchmarking operators at different levels of experience.METHODS: Six physicians with different degrees of neurointerventional procedural experience were recruited into a standardized training protocol comprising catheterization of two internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms and one basilar tip aneurysm, followed by introduction of one framing coil into each aneurysm and finally complete coil embolization of one determined ICA aneurysm. The level of difficulty increased with every aneurysm. Fluoroscopy was recorded and assessed for procedural characteristics and adverse events.RESULTS: Physicians were divided into inexperienced and experienced operators, depending on their experience with microcatheter handling. Mean overall catheterization times increased with difficulty of the aneurysm model. Inexperienced operators showed longer catheterization times (median; IQR: 47; 30-84s) than experienced operators (21; 13-58s, p = 0.011) and became significantly faster during the course of the attempts (rho = -0.493, p = 0.009) than the experienced physicians (rho = -0.318, p = 0.106). Number of dangerous maneuvers throughout all attempts was significantly higher for inexperienced operators (median; IQR: 1.0; 0.0-1.5) as compared to experienced operators (0.0; 0.0-1.0, p = 0.014).CONCLUSION: HANNES represents a modular neurointerventional training environment for practicing aneurysm coil embolization in vitro. Objective procedural metrics correlate with operator experience, suggesting that the system could be useful for assessing operator proficiency.",
keywords = "Adult, Blood Vessel Prosthesis, Catheterization/methods, Cerebral Angiography/methods, Computer Simulation, Education, Medical/methods, Embolization, Therapeutic/methods, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Intracranial Aneurysm/therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Biological, Simulation Training/methods",
author = "Nawka, {Marie Teresa} and Uta Hanning and Helena Guerreiro and Fabian Flottmann and {Van Horn}, Noel and Jan-Hendrik Buhk and Jens Fiehler and Fr{\"o}lich, {Andreas Maximilian}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0238952",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "e0238952",
journal = "PLOS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility of a customizable training environment for neurointerventional skills assessment

AU - Nawka, Marie Teresa

AU - Hanning, Uta

AU - Guerreiro, Helena

AU - Flottmann, Fabian

AU - Van Horn, Noel

AU - Buhk, Jan-Hendrik

AU - Fiehler, Jens

AU - Frölich, Andreas Maximilian

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To meet increasing demands to train neuroendovascular techniques, we developed a dedicated simulator applying individualized three-dimensional intracranial aneurysm models ('HANNES'; Hamburg Anatomic Neurointerventional Endovascular Simulator). We hypothesized that HANNES provides a realistic and reproducible training environment to practice coil embolization and to exemplify disparities between neurointerventionalists, thus objectively benchmarking operators at different levels of experience.METHODS: Six physicians with different degrees of neurointerventional procedural experience were recruited into a standardized training protocol comprising catheterization of two internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms and one basilar tip aneurysm, followed by introduction of one framing coil into each aneurysm and finally complete coil embolization of one determined ICA aneurysm. The level of difficulty increased with every aneurysm. Fluoroscopy was recorded and assessed for procedural characteristics and adverse events.RESULTS: Physicians were divided into inexperienced and experienced operators, depending on their experience with microcatheter handling. Mean overall catheterization times increased with difficulty of the aneurysm model. Inexperienced operators showed longer catheterization times (median; IQR: 47; 30-84s) than experienced operators (21; 13-58s, p = 0.011) and became significantly faster during the course of the attempts (rho = -0.493, p = 0.009) than the experienced physicians (rho = -0.318, p = 0.106). Number of dangerous maneuvers throughout all attempts was significantly higher for inexperienced operators (median; IQR: 1.0; 0.0-1.5) as compared to experienced operators (0.0; 0.0-1.0, p = 0.014).CONCLUSION: HANNES represents a modular neurointerventional training environment for practicing aneurysm coil embolization in vitro. Objective procedural metrics correlate with operator experience, suggesting that the system could be useful for assessing operator proficiency.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To meet increasing demands to train neuroendovascular techniques, we developed a dedicated simulator applying individualized three-dimensional intracranial aneurysm models ('HANNES'; Hamburg Anatomic Neurointerventional Endovascular Simulator). We hypothesized that HANNES provides a realistic and reproducible training environment to practice coil embolization and to exemplify disparities between neurointerventionalists, thus objectively benchmarking operators at different levels of experience.METHODS: Six physicians with different degrees of neurointerventional procedural experience were recruited into a standardized training protocol comprising catheterization of two internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms and one basilar tip aneurysm, followed by introduction of one framing coil into each aneurysm and finally complete coil embolization of one determined ICA aneurysm. The level of difficulty increased with every aneurysm. Fluoroscopy was recorded and assessed for procedural characteristics and adverse events.RESULTS: Physicians were divided into inexperienced and experienced operators, depending on their experience with microcatheter handling. Mean overall catheterization times increased with difficulty of the aneurysm model. Inexperienced operators showed longer catheterization times (median; IQR: 47; 30-84s) than experienced operators (21; 13-58s, p = 0.011) and became significantly faster during the course of the attempts (rho = -0.493, p = 0.009) than the experienced physicians (rho = -0.318, p = 0.106). Number of dangerous maneuvers throughout all attempts was significantly higher for inexperienced operators (median; IQR: 1.0; 0.0-1.5) as compared to experienced operators (0.0; 0.0-1.0, p = 0.014).CONCLUSION: HANNES represents a modular neurointerventional training environment for practicing aneurysm coil embolization in vitro. Objective procedural metrics correlate with operator experience, suggesting that the system could be useful for assessing operator proficiency.

KW - Adult

KW - Blood Vessel Prosthesis

KW - Catheterization/methods

KW - Cerebral Angiography/methods

KW - Computer Simulation

KW - Education, Medical/methods

KW - Embolization, Therapeutic/methods

KW - Feasibility Studies

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Intracranial Aneurysm/therapy

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Models, Biological

KW - Simulation Training/methods

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0238952

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0238952

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32941466

VL - 15

SP - e0238952

JO - PLOS ONE

JF - PLOS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 9

ER -