Feasibility and validity of the EQ-5D-3L in the elderly Europeans: a secondary data analysis using SHARE(d) data

Standard

Feasibility and validity of the EQ-5D-3L in the elderly Europeans: a secondary data analysis using SHARE(d) data. / Buchholz, Ines; Marten, Ole; Janssen, Mathieu F.

In: QUAL LIFE RES, Vol. 31, No. 11, 11.2022, p. 3267-3282.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e0e4ac71e48740ccb84b4b972d8de506,
title = "Feasibility and validity of the EQ-5D-3L in the elderly Europeans: a secondary data analysis using SHARE(d) data",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To determine feasibility and validity of the EQ-5D-3L in the elderly European population.METHODS: Secondary data analysis based on the study of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe (SHARE) to determine the percentage of missing items for EQ-5D dimensions and EQ VAS, and to demonstrate convergent/divergent validity with measures included in the SHARE survey. Known-groups validity was tested using literature-based hypotheses. Correlation coefficients and Cohen's f are reported.RESULTS: Missing values were below 3% across all EQ-5D dimensions and gender strata, slightly increasing with age. Individuals' responses to each EQ-5D dimension were related to their ratings of other measures in expected directions. The EQ VAS and all EQ-5D dimensions (except anxiety/depression) moderately to strongly correlated with physical [e.g. number of limitations in activities of daily living (ADL): r = 0.313-0.658] and generic measures [CASP (control, autonomy, self-realization, pleasure)-19 scale, self-perceived health, number of symptoms: r = 0.318-0.622], while anxiety/depression strongly correlated with the EURO-D scale (r = 0.527). Both EQ-5D dimensions and EQ VAS discriminated well between two [or more] groups known to differ [e.g. anxiety/depression discriminated well between persons classified as depressed/not depressed using the EURO-D scale, f = 0.51; self-care differentiated best between individuals without and with 1 + ADL limitations, f = 0.69]. Sociodemographic variables like gender, education, and partner in household were hardly associated with EQ VAS scores (f < 0.25).CONCLUSION: With item non-response of less than 3%, good discriminatory, and construct properties, the EQ-5D-3L showed to be a feasible and valid measure in the elderly Europeans.",
keywords = "Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Data Analysis, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Psychometrics/methods, Quality of Life/psychology, Reproducibility of Results, Retirement, Surveys and Questionnaires",
author = "Ines Buchholz and Ole Marten and Janssen, {Mathieu F}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2022. The Author(s).",
year = "2022",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s11136-022-03158-3",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "3267--3282",
journal = "QUAL LIFE RES",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility and validity of the EQ-5D-3L in the elderly Europeans: a secondary data analysis using SHARE(d) data

AU - Buchholz, Ines

AU - Marten, Ole

AU - Janssen, Mathieu F

N1 - © 2022. The Author(s).

PY - 2022/11

Y1 - 2022/11

N2 - PURPOSE: To determine feasibility and validity of the EQ-5D-3L in the elderly European population.METHODS: Secondary data analysis based on the study of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe (SHARE) to determine the percentage of missing items for EQ-5D dimensions and EQ VAS, and to demonstrate convergent/divergent validity with measures included in the SHARE survey. Known-groups validity was tested using literature-based hypotheses. Correlation coefficients and Cohen's f are reported.RESULTS: Missing values were below 3% across all EQ-5D dimensions and gender strata, slightly increasing with age. Individuals' responses to each EQ-5D dimension were related to their ratings of other measures in expected directions. The EQ VAS and all EQ-5D dimensions (except anxiety/depression) moderately to strongly correlated with physical [e.g. number of limitations in activities of daily living (ADL): r = 0.313-0.658] and generic measures [CASP (control, autonomy, self-realization, pleasure)-19 scale, self-perceived health, number of symptoms: r = 0.318-0.622], while anxiety/depression strongly correlated with the EURO-D scale (r = 0.527). Both EQ-5D dimensions and EQ VAS discriminated well between two [or more] groups known to differ [e.g. anxiety/depression discriminated well between persons classified as depressed/not depressed using the EURO-D scale, f = 0.51; self-care differentiated best between individuals without and with 1 + ADL limitations, f = 0.69]. Sociodemographic variables like gender, education, and partner in household were hardly associated with EQ VAS scores (f < 0.25).CONCLUSION: With item non-response of less than 3%, good discriminatory, and construct properties, the EQ-5D-3L showed to be a feasible and valid measure in the elderly Europeans.

AB - PURPOSE: To determine feasibility and validity of the EQ-5D-3L in the elderly European population.METHODS: Secondary data analysis based on the study of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe (SHARE) to determine the percentage of missing items for EQ-5D dimensions and EQ VAS, and to demonstrate convergent/divergent validity with measures included in the SHARE survey. Known-groups validity was tested using literature-based hypotheses. Correlation coefficients and Cohen's f are reported.RESULTS: Missing values were below 3% across all EQ-5D dimensions and gender strata, slightly increasing with age. Individuals' responses to each EQ-5D dimension were related to their ratings of other measures in expected directions. The EQ VAS and all EQ-5D dimensions (except anxiety/depression) moderately to strongly correlated with physical [e.g. number of limitations in activities of daily living (ADL): r = 0.313-0.658] and generic measures [CASP (control, autonomy, self-realization, pleasure)-19 scale, self-perceived health, number of symptoms: r = 0.318-0.622], while anxiety/depression strongly correlated with the EURO-D scale (r = 0.527). Both EQ-5D dimensions and EQ VAS discriminated well between two [or more] groups known to differ [e.g. anxiety/depression discriminated well between persons classified as depressed/not depressed using the EURO-D scale, f = 0.51; self-care differentiated best between individuals without and with 1 + ADL limitations, f = 0.69]. Sociodemographic variables like gender, education, and partner in household were hardly associated with EQ VAS scores (f < 0.25).CONCLUSION: With item non-response of less than 3%, good discriminatory, and construct properties, the EQ-5D-3L showed to be a feasible and valid measure in the elderly Europeans.

KW - Activities of Daily Living

KW - Aged

KW - Data Analysis

KW - Feasibility Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Psychometrics/methods

KW - Quality of Life/psychology

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Retirement

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

U2 - 10.1007/s11136-022-03158-3

DO - 10.1007/s11136-022-03158-3

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35624409

VL - 31

SP - 3267

EP - 3282

JO - QUAL LIFE RES

JF - QUAL LIFE RES

SN - 0962-9343

IS - 11

ER -