FDG PET is superior to CT in the prediction of viable tumour in post-chemotherapy seminoma residuals

TY - JOUR

T1 - FDG PET is superior to CT in the prediction of viable tumour in post-chemotherapy seminoma residuals

AU - Becherer, Alexander

AU - De Santis, Maria

AU - Karanikas, Georgios

AU - Szabó, Monica

AU - Bokemeyer, Carsten

AU - Dohmen, Bernhard M

AU - Pont, Jörg

AU - Dudczak, Robert

AU - Dittrich, Christian

AU - Kletter, Kurt

PY - 2005/5

Y1 - 2005/5

N2 - AIM: In advanced seminoma the management of residuals after completion of chemotherapy is controversial. Some centres routinely perform surgery for lesions > or =3 cm diameter, others recommend surgery solely if the residual fail to shrink or show even growth. This study prospectively investigates whether FDG PET can improve the prediction of viable tumour in post-chemotherapy seminoma residuals.MATERIALS AND METHODS: After an expansion of a previous study population, 54 patients from eight centres with metastatic seminoma and a CT-documented mass after chemotherapy were included in the study. Six patients were excluded from evaluation because of protocol violations. After PET, the patients underwent either surgery or were followed clinically. On follow-up the lesions were considered to be non-viable when there was unequivocal shrinking, or when the lesion remained morphologically stable for at least 24 months. Any lesion growth was assumed to be malignant. PET results were compared to CT discrimination (< or > or =3 cm) of the residual masses.RESULTS: Fifty-two PET scans were evaluable. After adequate chemotherapy, there were 74 CT-documented residual masses ranging in size from 1 to 11 cm (median, 2.2 cm). Their dignities were confirmed histologically in 13 lesions, or by follow-up CT in 61 lesions. Four of forty-seven lesions <3 cm and 11/27 lesions > or =3 cm were viable. PET was true positive in one lesion <3 cm and in 11 lesions > or =3 cm, false negative in three lesions <3 cm, and true negative in 59 lesions (43 lesions <3 cm). No PET scan was false positive. In detecting viability the sensitivity and specificity was 73% (95% CI, 44-88), and 73% (59-83), respectively, for CT (< or > or =3 cm); and 80% (51-95), and 100% (93-100), respectively, for PET (specificity, P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: In post-chemotherapy seminoma residuals, a positive PET is highly predictive for the presence of viable tumour. The specificity of PET is significantly higher than that of CT when using a > or =3 cm cut-off. A negative PET scan is excellent for the exclusion of disease in lesions > or =3 cm, with a somewhat higher sensitivity than CT (n.s.). PET can contribute to the management of residual seminoma lesions, especially in terms of avoiding unnecessary additional treatment for patients with lesions > or =3 cm.

AB - AIM: In advanced seminoma the management of residuals after completion of chemotherapy is controversial. Some centres routinely perform surgery for lesions > or =3 cm diameter, others recommend surgery solely if the residual fail to shrink or show even growth. This study prospectively investigates whether FDG PET can improve the prediction of viable tumour in post-chemotherapy seminoma residuals.MATERIALS AND METHODS: After an expansion of a previous study population, 54 patients from eight centres with metastatic seminoma and a CT-documented mass after chemotherapy were included in the study. Six patients were excluded from evaluation because of protocol violations. After PET, the patients underwent either surgery or were followed clinically. On follow-up the lesions were considered to be non-viable when there was unequivocal shrinking, or when the lesion remained morphologically stable for at least 24 months. Any lesion growth was assumed to be malignant. PET results were compared to CT discrimination (< or > or =3 cm) of the residual masses.RESULTS: Fifty-two PET scans were evaluable. After adequate chemotherapy, there were 74 CT-documented residual masses ranging in size from 1 to 11 cm (median, 2.2 cm). Their dignities were confirmed histologically in 13 lesions, or by follow-up CT in 61 lesions. Four of forty-seven lesions <3 cm and 11/27 lesions > or =3 cm were viable. PET was true positive in one lesion <3 cm and in 11 lesions > or =3 cm, false negative in three lesions <3 cm, and true negative in 59 lesions (43 lesions <3 cm). No PET scan was false positive. In detecting viability the sensitivity and specificity was 73% (95% CI, 44-88), and 73% (59-83), respectively, for CT (< or > or =3 cm); and 80% (51-95), and 100% (93-100), respectively, for PET (specificity, P < 0.001).CONCLUSION: In post-chemotherapy seminoma residuals, a positive PET is highly predictive for the presence of viable tumour. The specificity of PET is significantly higher than that of CT when using a > or =3 cm cut-off. A negative PET scan is excellent for the exclusion of disease in lesions > or =3 cm, with a somewhat higher sensitivity than CT (n.s.). PET can contribute to the management of residual seminoma lesions, especially in terms of avoiding unnecessary additional treatment for patients with lesions > or =3 cm.

KW - Abdomen

KW - Adult

KW - Fluorodeoxyglucose F18

KW - Follow-Up Studies

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Neoplasm, Residual

KW - Positron-Emission Tomography

KW - Predictive Value of Tests

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Radiographic Image Enhancement

KW - Radiography, Abdominal

KW - Radiography, Thoracic

KW - Radiopharmaceuticals

KW - Seminoma

KW - Sensitivity and Specificity

KW - Testicular Neoplasms

KW - Thorax

KW - Tomography, Spiral Computed

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.07.012

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 15837411

VL - 54

SP - 284

EP - 288

JO - EUR J RADIOL

JF - EUR J RADIOL

SN - 0720-048X

IS - 2

ER -