Favorable outcome using an abbreviated procedure for catheter ablation of AVNRT: results from a prospective randomized trial.

Standard

Favorable outcome using an abbreviated procedure for catheter ablation of AVNRT: results from a prospective randomized trial. / Steven, Daniel; Rostock, Thomas; Hoffmann, Boris A; Servatius, Helge; Drewitz, Imke; Müllerleile, Kai; Klemm, Hanno; Melchert, Carsten; Wegscheider, Karl; Meinertz, Thomas; Willems, Stephan.

In: J CARDIOVASC ELECTR, Vol. 20, No. 5, 5, 2009, p. 522-525.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Steven, D, Rostock, T, Hoffmann, BA, Servatius, H, Drewitz, I, Müllerleile, K, Klemm, H, Melchert, C, Wegscheider, K, Meinertz, T & Willems, S 2009, 'Favorable outcome using an abbreviated procedure for catheter ablation of AVNRT: results from a prospective randomized trial.', J CARDIOVASC ELECTR, vol. 20, no. 5, 5, pp. 522-525. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19207748?dopt=Citation>

APA

Steven, D., Rostock, T., Hoffmann, B. A., Servatius, H., Drewitz, I., Müllerleile, K., Klemm, H., Melchert, C., Wegscheider, K., Meinertz, T., & Willems, S. (2009). Favorable outcome using an abbreviated procedure for catheter ablation of AVNRT: results from a prospective randomized trial. J CARDIOVASC ELECTR, 20(5), 522-525. [5]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19207748?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Steven D, Rostock T, Hoffmann BA, Servatius H, Drewitz I, Müllerleile K et al. Favorable outcome using an abbreviated procedure for catheter ablation of AVNRT: results from a prospective randomized trial. J CARDIOVASC ELECTR. 2009;20(5):522-525. 5.

Bibtex

@article{2a0c6e0b75bc4ba58a30d9619c34524f,
title = "Favorable outcome using an abbreviated procedure for catheter ablation of AVNRT: results from a prospective randomized trial.",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency catheter ablation aiming slow pathway modulation is a widely established procedure with high success and low recurrence rates in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). However, the necessity of a waiting period following successful slow pathway modulation to increase the long-term success rates has not been systematically evaluated thus far. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective study comprised 138 consecutive patients (mean age 50.3 +/- 15.1 years) with AVNRT. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups: in group I (n = 70), a waiting period of 30 min was part of the procedure, whereas in group II (n = 68), the procedure ended without a waiting period. Electrophysiological standard parameters, i.e., ERP of RA, fast and slow pathway, RV as well as antegrade and retrograde AV node conduction capacity, were assessed prior to and after the ablation. During a follow-up period of 22.8 +/- 5.9 months, four patients in group I and three patients in group II developed recurrence of AVNRT (4.9%; P = 0.4). The mean procedure time was 115.1 +/- 23.6 min in the group with and 88.9 +/- 23.3 min in the group without waiting period (P = 0.009). No high degree AV-node conduction block was observed during the study. CONCLUSION: In the present study we could show that no long-term benefit results from a 30 min waiting period for patients who underwent an acutely successful catheter ablation for AVNRT. We therefore conclude that a 30-min waiting period can be omitted in standard procedures, thus resulting in significant shorter procedure durations.",
author = "Daniel Steven and Thomas Rostock and Hoffmann, {Boris A} and Helge Servatius and Imke Drewitz and Kai M{\"u}llerleile and Hanno Klemm and Carsten Melchert and Karl Wegscheider and Thomas Meinertz and Stephan Willems",
year = "2009",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "20",
pages = "522--525",
journal = "J CARDIOVASC ELECTR",
issn = "1045-3873",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Favorable outcome using an abbreviated procedure for catheter ablation of AVNRT: results from a prospective randomized trial.

AU - Steven, Daniel

AU - Rostock, Thomas

AU - Hoffmann, Boris A

AU - Servatius, Helge

AU - Drewitz, Imke

AU - Müllerleile, Kai

AU - Klemm, Hanno

AU - Melchert, Carsten

AU - Wegscheider, Karl

AU - Meinertz, Thomas

AU - Willems, Stephan

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency catheter ablation aiming slow pathway modulation is a widely established procedure with high success and low recurrence rates in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). However, the necessity of a waiting period following successful slow pathway modulation to increase the long-term success rates has not been systematically evaluated thus far. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective study comprised 138 consecutive patients (mean age 50.3 +/- 15.1 years) with AVNRT. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups: in group I (n = 70), a waiting period of 30 min was part of the procedure, whereas in group II (n = 68), the procedure ended without a waiting period. Electrophysiological standard parameters, i.e., ERP of RA, fast and slow pathway, RV as well as antegrade and retrograde AV node conduction capacity, were assessed prior to and after the ablation. During a follow-up period of 22.8 +/- 5.9 months, four patients in group I and three patients in group II developed recurrence of AVNRT (4.9%; P = 0.4). The mean procedure time was 115.1 +/- 23.6 min in the group with and 88.9 +/- 23.3 min in the group without waiting period (P = 0.009). No high degree AV-node conduction block was observed during the study. CONCLUSION: In the present study we could show that no long-term benefit results from a 30 min waiting period for patients who underwent an acutely successful catheter ablation for AVNRT. We therefore conclude that a 30-min waiting period can be omitted in standard procedures, thus resulting in significant shorter procedure durations.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency catheter ablation aiming slow pathway modulation is a widely established procedure with high success and low recurrence rates in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT). However, the necessity of a waiting period following successful slow pathway modulation to increase the long-term success rates has not been systematically evaluated thus far. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective study comprised 138 consecutive patients (mean age 50.3 +/- 15.1 years) with AVNRT. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups: in group I (n = 70), a waiting period of 30 min was part of the procedure, whereas in group II (n = 68), the procedure ended without a waiting period. Electrophysiological standard parameters, i.e., ERP of RA, fast and slow pathway, RV as well as antegrade and retrograde AV node conduction capacity, were assessed prior to and after the ablation. During a follow-up period of 22.8 +/- 5.9 months, four patients in group I and three patients in group II developed recurrence of AVNRT (4.9%; P = 0.4). The mean procedure time was 115.1 +/- 23.6 min in the group with and 88.9 +/- 23.3 min in the group without waiting period (P = 0.009). No high degree AV-node conduction block was observed during the study. CONCLUSION: In the present study we could show that no long-term benefit results from a 30 min waiting period for patients who underwent an acutely successful catheter ablation for AVNRT. We therefore conclude that a 30-min waiting period can be omitted in standard procedures, thus resulting in significant shorter procedure durations.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 20

SP - 522

EP - 525

JO - J CARDIOVASC ELECTR

JF - J CARDIOVASC ELECTR

SN - 1045-3873

IS - 5

M1 - 5

ER -