Research ExplorerPublications[Extraction of management information from the national qual...

[Extraction of management information from the national quality assurance program]

Standard

[Extraction of management information from the national quality assurance program]. / Stausberg, Jürgen; Bartels, Claus; Bobrowski, Christoph.

In: MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED, Vol. 102, No. 7, 7, 2007, p. 507-514.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Stausberg, J, Bartels, C & Bobrowski, C 2007, '[Extraction of management information from the national quality assurance program]', MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED, vol. 102, no. 7, 7, pp. 507-514. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17634868?dopt=Citation>

APA

Stausberg, J., Bartels, C., & Bobrowski, C. (2007). [Extraction of management information from the national quality assurance program]. MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED, 102(7), 507-514. [7]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17634868?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Stausberg J, Bartels C, Bobrowski C. [Extraction of management information from the national quality assurance program]. MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED. 2007;102(7):507-514. 7.

Bibtex

@article{4b2f1aa84114478ab9ef2c9d8033e05e,
title = "[Extraction of management information from the national quality assurance program]",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Starting with clinically motivated projects, the national quality assurance program has established a legislative obligatory framework. Annual feedback of results is an important means of quality control. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The annual reports cover quality-related information with high granularity. A synopsis for corporate management is missing, however. Therefore, the results of the University Clinics in Greifswald, Germany, have been analyzed and aggregated to support hospital management. RESULTS: Strengths were identified by the ranking of results within the state for each quality indicator, weaknesses by the comparison with national reference values. The assessment was aggregated per clinical discipline and per category (indication, process, and outcome). CONCLUSION: A composition of quality indicators was claimed multiple times. A coherent concept is still missing. The method presented establishes a plausible summary of strengths and weaknesses of a hospital from the point of view of the national quality assurance program. Nevertheless, further adaptation of the program is needed to better assist corporate management.",
author = "J{\"u}rgen Stausberg and Claus Bartels and Christoph Bobrowski",
year = "2007",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "102",
pages = "507--514",
journal = "MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED",
issn = "2193-6218",
publisher = "Springer Medizin",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Extraction of management information from the national quality assurance program]

AU - Stausberg, Jürgen

AU - Bartels, Claus

AU - Bobrowski, Christoph

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - BACKGROUND: Starting with clinically motivated projects, the national quality assurance program has established a legislative obligatory framework. Annual feedback of results is an important means of quality control. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The annual reports cover quality-related information with high granularity. A synopsis for corporate management is missing, however. Therefore, the results of the University Clinics in Greifswald, Germany, have been analyzed and aggregated to support hospital management. RESULTS: Strengths were identified by the ranking of results within the state for each quality indicator, weaknesses by the comparison with national reference values. The assessment was aggregated per clinical discipline and per category (indication, process, and outcome). CONCLUSION: A composition of quality indicators was claimed multiple times. A coherent concept is still missing. The method presented establishes a plausible summary of strengths and weaknesses of a hospital from the point of view of the national quality assurance program. Nevertheless, further adaptation of the program is needed to better assist corporate management.

AB - BACKGROUND: Starting with clinically motivated projects, the national quality assurance program has established a legislative obligatory framework. Annual feedback of results is an important means of quality control. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The annual reports cover quality-related information with high granularity. A synopsis for corporate management is missing, however. Therefore, the results of the University Clinics in Greifswald, Germany, have been analyzed and aggregated to support hospital management. RESULTS: Strengths were identified by the ranking of results within the state for each quality indicator, weaknesses by the comparison with national reference values. The assessment was aggregated per clinical discipline and per category (indication, process, and outcome). CONCLUSION: A composition of quality indicators was claimed multiple times. A coherent concept is still missing. The method presented establishes a plausible summary of strengths and weaknesses of a hospital from the point of view of the national quality assurance program. Nevertheless, further adaptation of the program is needed to better assist corporate management.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 102

SP - 507

EP - 514

JO - MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED

JF - MED KLIN-INTENSIVMED

SN - 2193-6218

IS - 7

M1 - 7

ER -