External validation of the diagnostic value of perihematomal edema characteristics in neoplastic and non-neoplastic intracerebral hemorrhage

  • Jawed Nawabi (Shared first author)
  • Tobias Orth (Shared first author)
  • Sophia Schulze-Weddige
  • Georg Lukas Baumgaertner
  • Anna Tietze
  • Christian Thaler
  • Tobias Penzkofer

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Neoplastic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) may be incorrectly identified as non-neoplastic ICH on imaging. Relative perihematomal edema (relPHE) on computed tomography (CT) has been proposed as a marker to discriminate neoplastic from non-neoplastic ICH but has not been externally validated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discriminatory power of relPHE in an independent cohort.

METHODS: A total of 291 patients with acute ICH on CT and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in this single-center retrospective study. ICH subjects were dichotomized into non-neoplastic or neoplastic ICH based on the diagnosis on the follow-up MRI. ICH and PHE volumes and density values were derived from semi-manually segmented CT scans. Calculated PHE characteristics for discriminating neoplastic ICH were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. ROC curve-associated cut-offs were calculated and compared between the initial and the validation cohort.

RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (39.86%) with neoplastic ICH and 175 (60.14%) with non-neoplastic ICH were included. Median PHE volumes, relPHE, and relPHE adjusted for hematoma density were significantly higher in subjects with neoplastic ICH (all p values <0.001). ROC curves for relPHE had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.78) and an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.87) for adjusted relPHE. The cut-offs were identical in the two cohorts, with >0.70 for relPHE and >0.01 for adjusted relPHE.

CONCLUSIONS: Relative perihematomal edema and adjusted relPHE accurately discriminated neoplastic from non-neoplastic ICH on CT imaging in an external patient cohort. These results confirmed the findings of the initial study and may improve clinical decision making.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN1351-5101
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 06.2023

Comment Deanary

© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.

PubMed 36847734