External validation of a shortened screening tool using individual participant data meta-analysis: A case study of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Dep-4

Standard

External validation of a shortened screening tool using individual participant data meta-analysis: A case study of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Dep-4. / Harel, Daphna; Levis, Brooke; Sun, Ying; Fischer, Felix; Ioannidis, John P A; Cuijpers, Pim; Patten, Scott B; Ziegelstein, Roy C; Markham, Sarah; Benedetti, Andrea; Thombs, Brett D; Depression Screening Data (DEPRESSD) PHQ Collaboration.

In: METHODS, Vol. 204, 08.2022, p. 300-311.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Harel, D, Levis, B, Sun, Y, Fischer, F, Ioannidis, JPA, Cuijpers, P, Patten, SB, Ziegelstein, RC, Markham, S, Benedetti, A, Thombs, BD & Depression Screening Data (DEPRESSD) PHQ Collaboration 2022, 'External validation of a shortened screening tool using individual participant data meta-analysis: A case study of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Dep-4', METHODS, vol. 204, pp. 300-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.11.005

APA

Harel, D., Levis, B., Sun, Y., Fischer, F., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Cuijpers, P., Patten, S. B., Ziegelstein, R. C., Markham, S., Benedetti, A., Thombs, B. D., & Depression Screening Data (DEPRESSD) PHQ Collaboration (2022). External validation of a shortened screening tool using individual participant data meta-analysis: A case study of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Dep-4. METHODS, 204, 300-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.11.005

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{aa4d58feefc5440480090fef7a2bd399,
title = "External validation of a shortened screening tool using individual participant data meta-analysis: A case study of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Dep-4",
abstract = "Shortened versions of self-reported questionnaires may be used to reduce respondent burden. When shortened screening tools are used, it is desirable to maintain equivalent diagnostic accuracy to full-length forms. This manuscript presents a case study that illustrates how external data and individual participant data meta-analysis can be used to assess the equivalence in diagnostic accuracy between a shortened and full-length form. This case study compares the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and a 4-item shortened version (PHQ-Dep-4) that was previously developed using optimal test assembly methods. Using a large database of 75 primary studies (34,698 participants, 3,392 major depression cases), we evaluated whether the PHQ-Dep-4 cutoff of ≥ 4 maintained equivalent diagnostic accuracy to a PHQ-9 cutoff of ≥ 10. Using this external validation dataset, a PHQ-Dep-4 cutoff of ≥ 4 maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity, with a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.81, 0.93), 0.68 (95% CI 0.56, 0.78), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.73, 0.85) for the semi-structured, fully structured, and MINI reference standard categories, respectively, and a specificity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.74, 0.83), 0.85 (95% CI 0.78, 0.90), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.80, 0.86) for the semi-structured, fully structured, and MINI reference standard categories, respectively. While equivalence with a PHQ-9 cutoff of ≥ 10 was not established, we found the sensitivity of the PHQ-Dep-4 to be non-inferior to that of the PHQ-9, and the specificity of the PHQ-Dep-4 to be marginally smaller than the PHQ-9.",
author = "Daphna Harel and Brooke Levis and Ying Sun and Felix Fischer and Ioannidis, {John P A} and Pim Cuijpers and Patten, {Scott B} and Ziegelstein, {Roy C} and Sarah Markham and Andrea Benedetti and Thombs, {Brett D} and {Depression Screening Data (DEPRESSD) PHQ Collaboration} and Bernd L{\"o}we and Martin H{\"a}rter",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.11.005",
language = "English",
volume = "204",
pages = "300--311",
journal = "METHODS",
issn = "1046-2023",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - External validation of a shortened screening tool using individual participant data meta-analysis: A case study of the Patient Health Questionnaire-Dep-4

AU - Harel, Daphna

AU - Levis, Brooke

AU - Sun, Ying

AU - Fischer, Felix

AU - Ioannidis, John P A

AU - Cuijpers, Pim

AU - Patten, Scott B

AU - Ziegelstein, Roy C

AU - Markham, Sarah

AU - Benedetti, Andrea

AU - Thombs, Brett D

AU - Depression Screening Data (DEPRESSD) PHQ Collaboration

AU - Löwe, Bernd

AU - Härter, Martin

N1 - Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022/8

Y1 - 2022/8

N2 - Shortened versions of self-reported questionnaires may be used to reduce respondent burden. When shortened screening tools are used, it is desirable to maintain equivalent diagnostic accuracy to full-length forms. This manuscript presents a case study that illustrates how external data and individual participant data meta-analysis can be used to assess the equivalence in diagnostic accuracy between a shortened and full-length form. This case study compares the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and a 4-item shortened version (PHQ-Dep-4) that was previously developed using optimal test assembly methods. Using a large database of 75 primary studies (34,698 participants, 3,392 major depression cases), we evaluated whether the PHQ-Dep-4 cutoff of ≥ 4 maintained equivalent diagnostic accuracy to a PHQ-9 cutoff of ≥ 10. Using this external validation dataset, a PHQ-Dep-4 cutoff of ≥ 4 maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity, with a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.81, 0.93), 0.68 (95% CI 0.56, 0.78), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.73, 0.85) for the semi-structured, fully structured, and MINI reference standard categories, respectively, and a specificity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.74, 0.83), 0.85 (95% CI 0.78, 0.90), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.80, 0.86) for the semi-structured, fully structured, and MINI reference standard categories, respectively. While equivalence with a PHQ-9 cutoff of ≥ 10 was not established, we found the sensitivity of the PHQ-Dep-4 to be non-inferior to that of the PHQ-9, and the specificity of the PHQ-Dep-4 to be marginally smaller than the PHQ-9.

AB - Shortened versions of self-reported questionnaires may be used to reduce respondent burden. When shortened screening tools are used, it is desirable to maintain equivalent diagnostic accuracy to full-length forms. This manuscript presents a case study that illustrates how external data and individual participant data meta-analysis can be used to assess the equivalence in diagnostic accuracy between a shortened and full-length form. This case study compares the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) and a 4-item shortened version (PHQ-Dep-4) that was previously developed using optimal test assembly methods. Using a large database of 75 primary studies (34,698 participants, 3,392 major depression cases), we evaluated whether the PHQ-Dep-4 cutoff of ≥ 4 maintained equivalent diagnostic accuracy to a PHQ-9 cutoff of ≥ 10. Using this external validation dataset, a PHQ-Dep-4 cutoff of ≥ 4 maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity, with a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.81, 0.93), 0.68 (95% CI 0.56, 0.78), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.73, 0.85) for the semi-structured, fully structured, and MINI reference standard categories, respectively, and a specificity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.74, 0.83), 0.85 (95% CI 0.78, 0.90), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.80, 0.86) for the semi-structured, fully structured, and MINI reference standard categories, respectively. While equivalence with a PHQ-9 cutoff of ≥ 10 was not established, we found the sensitivity of the PHQ-Dep-4 to be non-inferior to that of the PHQ-9, and the specificity of the PHQ-Dep-4 to be marginally smaller than the PHQ-9.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.11.005

DO - 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.11.005

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 34780986

VL - 204

SP - 300

EP - 311

JO - METHODS

JF - METHODS

SN - 1046-2023

ER -