Exploring concurrent validity of the CLN2 Clinical Rating Scale
Standard
Exploring concurrent validity of the CLN2 Clinical Rating Scale : Comparison to PedsQL using cerliponase alfa clinical trial data. / Specchio, Nicola; Gissen, Paul; de Los Reyes, Emily; Olaye, Andrew; Camp, Charlotte; Curteis, Tristan; Griffiths, Annabel; Butt, Thomas; Cohen-Pfeffer, Jessica; Slasor, Peter; Sisic, Zlatko; Jain, Mohit; Schulz, Angela.
In: PLOS ONE, Vol. 19, No. 5, 22.05.2024, p. e0302382.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring concurrent validity of the CLN2 Clinical Rating Scale
T2 - Comparison to PedsQL using cerliponase alfa clinical trial data
AU - Specchio, Nicola
AU - Gissen, Paul
AU - de Los Reyes, Emily
AU - Olaye, Andrew
AU - Camp, Charlotte
AU - Curteis, Tristan
AU - Griffiths, Annabel
AU - Butt, Thomas
AU - Cohen-Pfeffer, Jessica
AU - Slasor, Peter
AU - Sisic, Zlatko
AU - Jain, Mohit
AU - Schulz, Angela
N1 - Copyright: © 2024 Specchio et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2024/5/22
Y1 - 2024/5/22
N2 - BACKGROUND: The CLN2 Clinical Rating Scale evaluates disease progression in CLN2 disease, an ultra-rare, neurodegenerative disorder with late infantile onset. To validate the Clinical Rating Scale, a comparison with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) was conducted utilising clinical trial data investigating cerliponase alfa use in CLN2 disease.METHODS: Linear regression and mixed effects models were used to investigate the relationship between the Clinical Rating Scale and PedsQL using open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 (NCT01907087) and ongoing extension study (NCT02485899) data of 23 children with CLN2 disease treated with cerliponase alfa for ≥96 weeks.RESULTS: Correlations between the four Clinical Rating Scale domains were low. Linear mixed effects analyses showed significant correlation between PedsQL and Clinical Rating Scale (Total score or motor-language [ML] score adjusted p-values <0.05), driven by the relationship with the PedsQL Physical domain. A statistically significant relationship was identified between the Clinical Rating Scale motor domain and PedsQL (Total score: adjusted p-value = 0.048, parameter estimate [PE] = 8.10; Physical domain score: adjusted p-value = 0.012; PE = 13.79).CONCLUSIONS: Each domain of the Clinical Rating Scale provides unique information on disease state. Validity of the scale is supported by its relationship with the PedsQL. Among the four domains of the Clinical Rating Scale, motor has the highest correlation to PedsQL, suggesting motor function as a driver of patients' quality of life. The lack of association between the remaining domains of the Clinical Rating Scale and PedsQL suggests that additional disease-specific measures may be needed to fully capture the quality of life impact of CLN2 disease.TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01907087, NCT02485899.
AB - BACKGROUND: The CLN2 Clinical Rating Scale evaluates disease progression in CLN2 disease, an ultra-rare, neurodegenerative disorder with late infantile onset. To validate the Clinical Rating Scale, a comparison with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) was conducted utilising clinical trial data investigating cerliponase alfa use in CLN2 disease.METHODS: Linear regression and mixed effects models were used to investigate the relationship between the Clinical Rating Scale and PedsQL using open-label, single-arm, phase 1/2 (NCT01907087) and ongoing extension study (NCT02485899) data of 23 children with CLN2 disease treated with cerliponase alfa for ≥96 weeks.RESULTS: Correlations between the four Clinical Rating Scale domains were low. Linear mixed effects analyses showed significant correlation between PedsQL and Clinical Rating Scale (Total score or motor-language [ML] score adjusted p-values <0.05), driven by the relationship with the PedsQL Physical domain. A statistically significant relationship was identified between the Clinical Rating Scale motor domain and PedsQL (Total score: adjusted p-value = 0.048, parameter estimate [PE] = 8.10; Physical domain score: adjusted p-value = 0.012; PE = 13.79).CONCLUSIONS: Each domain of the Clinical Rating Scale provides unique information on disease state. Validity of the scale is supported by its relationship with the PedsQL. Among the four domains of the Clinical Rating Scale, motor has the highest correlation to PedsQL, suggesting motor function as a driver of patients' quality of life. The lack of association between the remaining domains of the Clinical Rating Scale and PedsQL suggests that additional disease-specific measures may be needed to fully capture the quality of life impact of CLN2 disease.TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01907087, NCT02485899.
KW - Humans
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Female
KW - Male
KW - Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses/drug therapy
KW - Child
KW - Tripeptidyl-Peptidase 1
KW - Child, Preschool
KW - Adolescent
KW - Dipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-Peptidases
KW - Severity of Illness Index
KW - Disease Progression
KW - Recombinant Proteins
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0302382
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0302382
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 38776275
VL - 19
SP - e0302382
JO - PLOS ONE
JF - PLOS ONE
SN - 1932-6203
IS - 5
ER -