Exploring Adherence to First-Line and Second-Line Immunotherapies in Multiple Sclerosis: An Interview Study

Standard

Exploring Adherence to First-Line and Second-Line Immunotherapies in Multiple Sclerosis: An Interview Study. / Pust, Gesa E A; Untiedt, Benthe; Randerath, Jennifer; Barabasch, Anna; Köpke, Sascha; Rahn, Anne C; Hansen, Hilke; Heesen, Christoph.

In: Int J MS Care, Vol. 22, No. 5, 13.11.2020, p. 219-225.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Pust, GEA, Untiedt, B, Randerath, J, Barabasch, A, Köpke, S, Rahn, AC, Hansen, H & Heesen, C 2020, 'Exploring Adherence to First-Line and Second-Line Immunotherapies in Multiple Sclerosis: An Interview Study', Int J MS Care, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 219-225. https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2018-068

APA

Pust, G. E. A., Untiedt, B., Randerath, J., Barabasch, A., Köpke, S., Rahn, A. C., Hansen, H., & Heesen, C. (2020). Exploring Adherence to First-Line and Second-Line Immunotherapies in Multiple Sclerosis: An Interview Study. Int J MS Care, 22(5), 219-225. https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2018-068

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{e528eb3ecba149dd916fcc83e20992dc,
title = "Exploring Adherence to First-Line and Second-Line Immunotherapies in Multiple Sclerosis: An Interview Study",
abstract = "Background: Treatment adherence is fundamental in multiple sclerosis (MS) management. Adherence rates vary significantly between studies, ranging from 30% to almost 90%, depending on assessment method and medication type. This study aimed to identify patient-related categories associated with treatment modification or discontinuation in people with MS receiving either first- or second-line treatment.Methods: Semistructured interviews were performed with 23 people with MS: 11 receiving first-line treatment and 12 receiving second-line treatment. Medication history, experiences with previous medications, decision-making processes regarding immunotherapy, adherence behavior, and reasons for adherence/nonadherence were explored using open-ended questions. Qualitative content analysis was performed using a combined deductive-inductive approach in building a coding frame. Differences in coding frequencies were compared between the two groups and analyzed quantitatively. Cohen's kappas of 0.76 for people with MS receiving first-line treatment and 0.64 for the second-line sample were achieved between the two coders.Results: One key reason for nonadherence reported by first-line-treated people with MS was burdensome side effects, and for adherence was belief in medication effectiveness. In people with MS receiving second-line treatment, lack of perceived medication effectiveness was a key category related to changes in or discontinuation of immunotherapy. Reasons for adherence were positive illness beliefs/perceptions and belief in highly active disease. Intentional nonadherence was a major issue for first-line treatment and less relevant for second-line treatment.Conclusions: These results indicate specific differences in factors mitigating adherence in people with MS receiving first- and second-line treatment.",
author = "Pust, {Gesa E A} and Benthe Untiedt and Jennifer Randerath and Anna Barabasch and Sascha K{\"o}pke and Rahn, {Anne C} and Hilke Hansen and Christoph Heesen",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2020 Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers.",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
day = "13",
doi = "10.7224/1537-2073.2018-068",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "219--225",
journal = "Int J MS Care",
issn = "1537-2073",
publisher = "Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers (CMSC)",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring Adherence to First-Line and Second-Line Immunotherapies in Multiple Sclerosis: An Interview Study

AU - Pust, Gesa E A

AU - Untiedt, Benthe

AU - Randerath, Jennifer

AU - Barabasch, Anna

AU - Köpke, Sascha

AU - Rahn, Anne C

AU - Hansen, Hilke

AU - Heesen, Christoph

N1 - © 2020 Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers.

PY - 2020/11/13

Y1 - 2020/11/13

N2 - Background: Treatment adherence is fundamental in multiple sclerosis (MS) management. Adherence rates vary significantly between studies, ranging from 30% to almost 90%, depending on assessment method and medication type. This study aimed to identify patient-related categories associated with treatment modification or discontinuation in people with MS receiving either first- or second-line treatment.Methods: Semistructured interviews were performed with 23 people with MS: 11 receiving first-line treatment and 12 receiving second-line treatment. Medication history, experiences with previous medications, decision-making processes regarding immunotherapy, adherence behavior, and reasons for adherence/nonadherence were explored using open-ended questions. Qualitative content analysis was performed using a combined deductive-inductive approach in building a coding frame. Differences in coding frequencies were compared between the two groups and analyzed quantitatively. Cohen's kappas of 0.76 for people with MS receiving first-line treatment and 0.64 for the second-line sample were achieved between the two coders.Results: One key reason for nonadherence reported by first-line-treated people with MS was burdensome side effects, and for adherence was belief in medication effectiveness. In people with MS receiving second-line treatment, lack of perceived medication effectiveness was a key category related to changes in or discontinuation of immunotherapy. Reasons for adherence were positive illness beliefs/perceptions and belief in highly active disease. Intentional nonadherence was a major issue for first-line treatment and less relevant for second-line treatment.Conclusions: These results indicate specific differences in factors mitigating adherence in people with MS receiving first- and second-line treatment.

AB - Background: Treatment adherence is fundamental in multiple sclerosis (MS) management. Adherence rates vary significantly between studies, ranging from 30% to almost 90%, depending on assessment method and medication type. This study aimed to identify patient-related categories associated with treatment modification or discontinuation in people with MS receiving either first- or second-line treatment.Methods: Semistructured interviews were performed with 23 people with MS: 11 receiving first-line treatment and 12 receiving second-line treatment. Medication history, experiences with previous medications, decision-making processes regarding immunotherapy, adherence behavior, and reasons for adherence/nonadherence were explored using open-ended questions. Qualitative content analysis was performed using a combined deductive-inductive approach in building a coding frame. Differences in coding frequencies were compared between the two groups and analyzed quantitatively. Cohen's kappas of 0.76 for people with MS receiving first-line treatment and 0.64 for the second-line sample were achieved between the two coders.Results: One key reason for nonadherence reported by first-line-treated people with MS was burdensome side effects, and for adherence was belief in medication effectiveness. In people with MS receiving second-line treatment, lack of perceived medication effectiveness was a key category related to changes in or discontinuation of immunotherapy. Reasons for adherence were positive illness beliefs/perceptions and belief in highly active disease. Intentional nonadherence was a major issue for first-line treatment and less relevant for second-line treatment.Conclusions: These results indicate specific differences in factors mitigating adherence in people with MS receiving first- and second-line treatment.

U2 - 10.7224/1537-2073.2018-068

DO - 10.7224/1537-2073.2018-068

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 33177958

VL - 22

SP - 219

EP - 225

JO - Int J MS Care

JF - Int J MS Care

SN - 1537-2073

IS - 5

ER -