Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound

Standard

Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound. / Golatta, Michael; Schweitzer-Martin, Mirjam; Harcos, Aba; Schott, Sarah; Gomez, Christina; Stieber, Anne; Rauch, Geraldine; Domschke, Christoph; Rom, Joachim; Schütz, Florian; Sohn, Christof; Heil, Jörg.

In: BIOMED RES INT , Vol. 2014, 31.03.2014, p. 960262.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Golatta, M, Schweitzer-Martin, M, Harcos, A, Schott, S, Gomez, C, Stieber, A, Rauch, G, Domschke, C, Rom, J, Schütz, F, Sohn, C & Heil, J 2014, 'Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound', BIOMED RES INT , vol. 2014, pp. 960262. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/960262

APA

Golatta, M., Schweitzer-Martin, M., Harcos, A., Schott, S., Gomez, C., Stieber, A., Rauch, G., Domschke, C., Rom, J., Schütz, F., Sohn, C., & Heil, J. (2014). Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound. BIOMED RES INT , 2014, 960262. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/960262

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{093d67356bfe44b8978420dc6d644692,
title = "Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To evaluate virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) as a new elastography method concerning its intra- and interexaminer reliability and its ability to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions in comparison to and in combination with ultrasound (US) B-mode breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) assessment.MATERIALS AND METHODS: US and VTIQ were performed by two examiners in 103 women with 104 lesions. Intra- and interexaminer reliability of VTIQ was assessed. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of BIRADS, VTIQ, and combined data were compared.RESULTS: Fifty-four of 104 lesions were malignant. Intraexaminer reliability was consistent, and interexaminer agreement showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.93). The mean VTIQ values in malignant lesions were significantly higher than those in benign (7.73 m/s ± 1.02 versus 4.46 m/s ± 1.87; P < 0.0001). The combination of US-BIRADS with the optimal cut-off for clinical decision making of 5.18 m/s yielded a sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 82%, PPV of 86%, and NPV of 98%. The combination of BIRADS and VTIQ led to improved test validity.CONCLUSION: VTIQ is highly reliable and reproducible. There is a significant difference regarding the mean maximum velocity of benign and malignant lesions. Adding VTIQ to BIRADS assessment improves the specificity.",
keywords = "Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Area Under Curve, Breast Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Middle Aged, ROC Curve, Young Adult, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't",
author = "Michael Golatta and Mirjam Schweitzer-Martin and Aba Harcos and Sarah Schott and Christina Gomez and Anne Stieber and Geraldine Rauch and Christoph Domschke and Joachim Rom and Florian Sch{\"u}tz and Christof Sohn and J{\"o}rg Heil",
year = "2014",
month = mar,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1155/2014/960262",
language = "English",
volume = "2014",
pages = "960262",
journal = "BIOMED RES INT ",
issn = "2314-6133",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification, a new shear wave velocity imaging method, for breast lesion assessment by ultrasound

AU - Golatta, Michael

AU - Schweitzer-Martin, Mirjam

AU - Harcos, Aba

AU - Schott, Sarah

AU - Gomez, Christina

AU - Stieber, Anne

AU - Rauch, Geraldine

AU - Domschke, Christoph

AU - Rom, Joachim

AU - Schütz, Florian

AU - Sohn, Christof

AU - Heil, Jörg

PY - 2014/3/31

Y1 - 2014/3/31

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) as a new elastography method concerning its intra- and interexaminer reliability and its ability to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions in comparison to and in combination with ultrasound (US) B-mode breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) assessment.MATERIALS AND METHODS: US and VTIQ were performed by two examiners in 103 women with 104 lesions. Intra- and interexaminer reliability of VTIQ was assessed. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of BIRADS, VTIQ, and combined data were compared.RESULTS: Fifty-four of 104 lesions were malignant. Intraexaminer reliability was consistent, and interexaminer agreement showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.93). The mean VTIQ values in malignant lesions were significantly higher than those in benign (7.73 m/s ± 1.02 versus 4.46 m/s ± 1.87; P < 0.0001). The combination of US-BIRADS with the optimal cut-off for clinical decision making of 5.18 m/s yielded a sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 82%, PPV of 86%, and NPV of 98%. The combination of BIRADS and VTIQ led to improved test validity.CONCLUSION: VTIQ is highly reliable and reproducible. There is a significant difference regarding the mean maximum velocity of benign and malignant lesions. Adding VTIQ to BIRADS assessment improves the specificity.

AB - OBJECTIVES: To evaluate virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) as a new elastography method concerning its intra- and interexaminer reliability and its ability to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions in comparison to and in combination with ultrasound (US) B-mode breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) assessment.MATERIALS AND METHODS: US and VTIQ were performed by two examiners in 103 women with 104 lesions. Intra- and interexaminer reliability of VTIQ was assessed. The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of BIRADS, VTIQ, and combined data were compared.RESULTS: Fifty-four of 104 lesions were malignant. Intraexaminer reliability was consistent, and interexaminer agreement showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.93). The mean VTIQ values in malignant lesions were significantly higher than those in benign (7.73 m/s ± 1.02 versus 4.46 m/s ± 1.87; P < 0.0001). The combination of US-BIRADS with the optimal cut-off for clinical decision making of 5.18 m/s yielded a sensitivity of 98%, specificity of 82%, PPV of 86%, and NPV of 98%. The combination of BIRADS and VTIQ led to improved test validity.CONCLUSION: VTIQ is highly reliable and reproducible. There is a significant difference regarding the mean maximum velocity of benign and malignant lesions. Adding VTIQ to BIRADS assessment improves the specificity.

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Area Under Curve

KW - Breast Neoplasms

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Elasticity Imaging Techniques

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Image Processing, Computer-Assisted

KW - Middle Aged

KW - ROC Curve

KW - Young Adult

KW - Journal Article

KW - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

U2 - 10.1155/2014/960262

DO - 10.1155/2014/960262

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24800257

VL - 2014

SP - 960262

JO - BIOMED RES INT

JF - BIOMED RES INT

SN - 2314-6133

ER -