Evaluation of prognostic factors and two radiation techniques in patients treated with surgery followed by radio(chemo)therapy or definitive radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer.

Standard

Evaluation of prognostic factors and two radiation techniques in patients treated with surgery followed by radio(chemo)therapy or definitive radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. / Rades, Dirk; Stoehr, Monika; Meyners, Thekla; Bohlen, Guenther; Nadrowitz, Roger; Dunst, Juergen; Schild, Steven E; Wroblewski, Junes; Albers, Dirk; Schmidt, Rainer; Alberti, Winfried; Tribius, Silke.

In: STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, Vol. 184, No. 4, 4, 2008, p. 198-205.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rades, D, Stoehr, M, Meyners, T, Bohlen, G, Nadrowitz, R, Dunst, J, Schild, SE, Wroblewski, J, Albers, D, Schmidt, R, Alberti, W & Tribius, S 2008, 'Evaluation of prognostic factors and two radiation techniques in patients treated with surgery followed by radio(chemo)therapy or definitive radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer.', STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, vol. 184, no. 4, 4, pp. 198-205. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18398584?dopt=Citation>

APA

Rades, D., Stoehr, M., Meyners, T., Bohlen, G., Nadrowitz, R., Dunst, J., Schild, S. E., Wroblewski, J., Albers, D., Schmidt, R., Alberti, W., & Tribius, S. (2008). Evaluation of prognostic factors and two radiation techniques in patients treated with surgery followed by radio(chemo)therapy or definitive radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, 184(4), 198-205. [4]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18398584?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{17a5f5baf5e0466b97255ed89de19823,
title = "Evaluation of prognostic factors and two radiation techniques in patients treated with surgery followed by radio(chemo)therapy or definitive radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer.",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional radiotherapy (RT) still is the standard technique for head-and-neck cancer in many centers worldwide, whereas other centers replaced this technique by 3-D conformal RT, which is associated with more appropriate dose distributions. Comparative studies regarding outcome and toxicity are lacking. This study compared both techniques for overall survival (OS), metastases-free survival (MFS), loco-regional control (LC), and toxicity in stage III/IV head-and-neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 345 patients irradiated for stage III/IV squamous cell head-and-neck cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received conventional RT (group A, n = 166) or 3-D conformal RT (group B, n = 179). Both techniques were compared for outcomes and toxicity. Eleven further potential prognostic factors were investigated: age, gender, performance status, tumor site, grading, T-stage, N-stage, AJCC-stage, chemotherapy, surgery, pre-RT hemoglobin. RESULTS: 3-year-OS was 62% in group A and 57% in group B (p = 0.15). 3-year-MFS was 67% and 76% (p = 0.46), 3-year-LC was 65% and 68%, respectively (p = 0.71). On multivariate analysis, gender (p = 0.005), performance status (p <0.001), T-stage (p = 0.002), and N-stage (p <0.001) were associated with OS. MFS was influenced by performance status (p <0.001) and N-stage (p <0.001), LC by gender (p = 0.021), T-stage (p <0.001), and pre-RT hemoglobin level (>or= 12 better than <12 g/dl, p = 0.004). Grade 2-3 xerostomia was less frequent with 3-D conformal RT (43% vs. 58%, p = 0.06). Otherwise, toxicities were similar. CONCLUSION: Both RT techniques resulted in similar treatment outcomes. Because xerostomia was less with 3-D conformal RT, this technique appeared beneficial for patients, in whom one parotid gland can be spared. Outcome was associated with gender, performance status, tumor stage, and pre-RT hemoglobin.",
author = "Dirk Rades and Monika Stoehr and Thekla Meyners and Guenther Bohlen and Roger Nadrowitz and Juergen Dunst and Schild, {Steven E} and Junes Wroblewski and Dirk Albers and Rainer Schmidt and Winfried Alberti and Silke Tribius",
year = "2008",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "184",
pages = "198--205",
journal = "STRAHLENTHER ONKOL",
issn = "0179-7158",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of prognostic factors and two radiation techniques in patients treated with surgery followed by radio(chemo)therapy or definitive radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer.

AU - Rades, Dirk

AU - Stoehr, Monika

AU - Meyners, Thekla

AU - Bohlen, Guenther

AU - Nadrowitz, Roger

AU - Dunst, Juergen

AU - Schild, Steven E

AU - Wroblewski, Junes

AU - Albers, Dirk

AU - Schmidt, Rainer

AU - Alberti, Winfried

AU - Tribius, Silke

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional radiotherapy (RT) still is the standard technique for head-and-neck cancer in many centers worldwide, whereas other centers replaced this technique by 3-D conformal RT, which is associated with more appropriate dose distributions. Comparative studies regarding outcome and toxicity are lacking. This study compared both techniques for overall survival (OS), metastases-free survival (MFS), loco-regional control (LC), and toxicity in stage III/IV head-and-neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 345 patients irradiated for stage III/IV squamous cell head-and-neck cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received conventional RT (group A, n = 166) or 3-D conformal RT (group B, n = 179). Both techniques were compared for outcomes and toxicity. Eleven further potential prognostic factors were investigated: age, gender, performance status, tumor site, grading, T-stage, N-stage, AJCC-stage, chemotherapy, surgery, pre-RT hemoglobin. RESULTS: 3-year-OS was 62% in group A and 57% in group B (p = 0.15). 3-year-MFS was 67% and 76% (p = 0.46), 3-year-LC was 65% and 68%, respectively (p = 0.71). On multivariate analysis, gender (p = 0.005), performance status (p <0.001), T-stage (p = 0.002), and N-stage (p <0.001) were associated with OS. MFS was influenced by performance status (p <0.001) and N-stage (p <0.001), LC by gender (p = 0.021), T-stage (p <0.001), and pre-RT hemoglobin level (>or= 12 better than <12 g/dl, p = 0.004). Grade 2-3 xerostomia was less frequent with 3-D conformal RT (43% vs. 58%, p = 0.06). Otherwise, toxicities were similar. CONCLUSION: Both RT techniques resulted in similar treatment outcomes. Because xerostomia was less with 3-D conformal RT, this technique appeared beneficial for patients, in whom one parotid gland can be spared. Outcome was associated with gender, performance status, tumor stage, and pre-RT hemoglobin.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conventional radiotherapy (RT) still is the standard technique for head-and-neck cancer in many centers worldwide, whereas other centers replaced this technique by 3-D conformal RT, which is associated with more appropriate dose distributions. Comparative studies regarding outcome and toxicity are lacking. This study compared both techniques for overall survival (OS), metastases-free survival (MFS), loco-regional control (LC), and toxicity in stage III/IV head-and-neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 345 patients irradiated for stage III/IV squamous cell head-and-neck cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received conventional RT (group A, n = 166) or 3-D conformal RT (group B, n = 179). Both techniques were compared for outcomes and toxicity. Eleven further potential prognostic factors were investigated: age, gender, performance status, tumor site, grading, T-stage, N-stage, AJCC-stage, chemotherapy, surgery, pre-RT hemoglobin. RESULTS: 3-year-OS was 62% in group A and 57% in group B (p = 0.15). 3-year-MFS was 67% and 76% (p = 0.46), 3-year-LC was 65% and 68%, respectively (p = 0.71). On multivariate analysis, gender (p = 0.005), performance status (p <0.001), T-stage (p = 0.002), and N-stage (p <0.001) were associated with OS. MFS was influenced by performance status (p <0.001) and N-stage (p <0.001), LC by gender (p = 0.021), T-stage (p <0.001), and pre-RT hemoglobin level (>or= 12 better than <12 g/dl, p = 0.004). Grade 2-3 xerostomia was less frequent with 3-D conformal RT (43% vs. 58%, p = 0.06). Otherwise, toxicities were similar. CONCLUSION: Both RT techniques resulted in similar treatment outcomes. Because xerostomia was less with 3-D conformal RT, this technique appeared beneficial for patients, in whom one parotid gland can be spared. Outcome was associated with gender, performance status, tumor stage, and pre-RT hemoglobin.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 184

SP - 198

EP - 205

JO - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

JF - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

SN - 0179-7158

IS - 4

M1 - 4

ER -