Error quantification in multi-parameter mapping facilitates robust estimation and enhanced group level sensitivity
Standard
Error quantification in multi-parameter mapping facilitates robust estimation and enhanced group level sensitivity. / Mohammadi, Siawoosh; Streubel, Tobias; Klock, Leonie; Edwards, Luke J; Lutti, Antoine; Pine, Kerrin J; Weber, Sandra; Scheibe, Patrick; Ziegler, Gabriel; Gallinat, Jürgen; Kühn, Simone; Callaghan, Martina F; Weiskopf, Nikolaus; Tabelow, Karsten.
In: NEUROIMAGE, Vol. 262, 119529, 15.11.2022.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Error quantification in multi-parameter mapping facilitates robust estimation and enhanced group level sensitivity
AU - Mohammadi, Siawoosh
AU - Streubel, Tobias
AU - Klock, Leonie
AU - Edwards, Luke J
AU - Lutti, Antoine
AU - Pine, Kerrin J
AU - Weber, Sandra
AU - Scheibe, Patrick
AU - Ziegler, Gabriel
AU - Gallinat, Jürgen
AU - Kühn, Simone
AU - Callaghan, Martina F
AU - Weiskopf, Nikolaus
AU - Tabelow, Karsten
N1 - Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/11/15
Y1 - 2022/11/15
N2 - Multi-Parameter Mapping (MPM) is a comprehensive quantitative neuroimaging protocol that enables estimation of four physical parameters (longitudinal and effective transverse relaxation rates R1 and R2*, proton density PD, and magnetization transfer saturation MTsat) that are sensitive to microstructural tissue properties such as iron and myelin content. Their capability to reveal microstructural brain differences, however, is tightly bound to controlling random noise and artefacts (e.g. caused by head motion) in the signal. Here, we introduced a method to estimate the local error of PD, R1, and MTsat maps that captures both noise and artefacts on a routine basis without requiring additional data. To investigate the method's sensitivity to random noise, we calculated the model-based signal-to-noise ratio (mSNR) and showed in measurements and simulations that it correlated linearly with an experimental raw-image-based SNR map. We found that the mSNR varied with MPM protocols, magnetic field strength (3T vs. 7T) and MPM parameters: it halved from PD to R1 and decreased from PD to MTsat by a factor of 3-4. Exploring the artefact-sensitivity of the error maps, we generated robust MPM parameters using two successive acquisitions of each contrast and the acquisition-specific errors to down-weight erroneous regions. The resulting robust MPM parameters showed reduced variability at the group level as compared to their single-repeat or averaged counterparts. The error and mSNR maps may better inform power-calculations by accounting for local data quality variations across measurements. Code to compute the mSNR maps and robustly combined MPM maps is available in the open-source hMRI toolbox.
AB - Multi-Parameter Mapping (MPM) is a comprehensive quantitative neuroimaging protocol that enables estimation of four physical parameters (longitudinal and effective transverse relaxation rates R1 and R2*, proton density PD, and magnetization transfer saturation MTsat) that are sensitive to microstructural tissue properties such as iron and myelin content. Their capability to reveal microstructural brain differences, however, is tightly bound to controlling random noise and artefacts (e.g. caused by head motion) in the signal. Here, we introduced a method to estimate the local error of PD, R1, and MTsat maps that captures both noise and artefacts on a routine basis without requiring additional data. To investigate the method's sensitivity to random noise, we calculated the model-based signal-to-noise ratio (mSNR) and showed in measurements and simulations that it correlated linearly with an experimental raw-image-based SNR map. We found that the mSNR varied with MPM protocols, magnetic field strength (3T vs. 7T) and MPM parameters: it halved from PD to R1 and decreased from PD to MTsat by a factor of 3-4. Exploring the artefact-sensitivity of the error maps, we generated robust MPM parameters using two successive acquisitions of each contrast and the acquisition-specific errors to down-weight erroneous regions. The resulting robust MPM parameters showed reduced variability at the group level as compared to their single-repeat or averaged counterparts. The error and mSNR maps may better inform power-calculations by accounting for local data quality variations across measurements. Code to compute the mSNR maps and robustly combined MPM maps is available in the open-source hMRI toolbox.
KW - Artifacts
KW - Brain/diagnostic imaging
KW - Humans
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
KW - Myelin Sheath
KW - Neuroimaging/methods
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119529
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119529
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 35926761
VL - 262
JO - NEUROIMAGE
JF - NEUROIMAGE
SN - 1053-8119
M1 - 119529
ER -