Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?: Teil 1: Eingriffe an der Aorta

E. S. Debus; T. Kölbel; D. Manzoni; C. A. Behrendt; F. Heidemann; R. T. Grundmann

doi:10.1007/s00104-015-0146-1

Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?

Standard

Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken? Teil 1: Eingriffe an der Aorta. / Debus, E. S.; Kölbel, T.; Manzoni, D.; Behrendt, C. A.; Heidemann, F.; Grundmann, R. T.

In: CHIRURG, Vol. 87, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 195-201.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Review article › Research

Harvard

Debus, ES , Kölbel, T, Manzoni, D, Behrendt, CA, Heidemann, F & Grundmann, RT 2016, 'Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken? Teil 1: Eingriffe an der Aorta', CHIRURG, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-015-0146-1

APA

Debus, E. S., Kölbel, T., Manzoni, D., Behrendt, C. A., Heidemann, F., & Grundmann, R. T. (2016). Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken? Teil 1: Eingriffe an der Aorta. CHIRURG, 87(3), 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-015-0146-1

Vancouver

Debus ES , Kölbel T, Manzoni D, Behrendt CA, Heidemann F, Grundmann RT. Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken? Teil 1: Eingriffe an der Aorta. CHIRURG. 2016 Mar 1;87(3):195-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-015-0146-1

Bibtex

@article{dfe82d8a66d64072b695fa0f79d13168,

title = "Endovaskul{\"a}re vs. konventionelle Gef{\"a}{\ss}chirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?: Teil 1: Eingriffe an der Aorta",

abstract = "Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissection, descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms as well as asymptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.",

keywords = "Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Aortic dissection, Endovascular repair, Open repair, Thoracic aortic aneurysm",

author = "Debus, {E. S.} and T. K{\"o}lbel and D. Manzoni and Behrendt, {C. A.} and F. Heidemann and Grundmann, {R. T.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.",

year = "2016",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s00104-015-0146-1",

language = "Deutsch",

volume = "87",

pages = "195--201",

journal = "CHIRURG",

issn = "0009-4722",

publisher = "Springer",

number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endovaskuläre vs. konventionelle Gefäßchirurgie – antiquiertes Denken?

T2 - Teil 1: Eingriffe an der Aorta

AU - Debus, E. S.

AU - Kölbel, T.

AU - Manzoni, D.

AU - Behrendt, C. A.

AU - Heidemann, F.

AU - Grundmann, R. T.

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissection, descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms as well as asymptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

AB - Endovascular therapy has widely replaced conventional open vascular surgical reconstruction. For this reason both techniques were widely considered to be competing approaches. Evidence-based data from randomized prospective trials, meta-analyses and clinical registries, however, demonstrated that both techniques should be used to complement each other. It became increasingly more evident that the use of either procedure depends on the underlying disease and the anatomical conditions, whereby a combination of both (hybrid approach) may be the preferred option in certain situations. This review focuses on the treatment of complicated acute type B aortic dissection, descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms as well as asymptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

KW - Abdominal aortic aneurysm

KW - Aortic dissection

KW - Endovascular repair

KW - Open repair

KW - Thoracic aortic aneurysm

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961159319&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00104-015-0146-1

DO - 10.1007/s00104-015-0146-1

M3 - SCORING: Review

C2 - 26801752

AN - SCOPUS:84961159319

VL - 87

SP - 195

EP - 201

JO - CHIRURG

JF - CHIRURG

SN - 0009-4722

IS - 3

ER -