Research ExplorerPublicationsEndoscopy in Barrett's oesophagus: adherence to standards an...

Endoscopy in Barrett's oesophagus: adherence to standards and neoplasia detection in the community practice versus hospital setting.

Standard

Endoscopy in Barrett's oesophagus: adherence to standards and neoplasia detection in the community practice versus hospital setting. / Pohl, H; Aschenbeck, J; Drossel, R; Schröder, A; Mayr, M; Koch, M; Rothe, K; Anders, M; Voderholzer, W; Hoffmann, J; Schulz, H-J; Liehr, R-M; Gottschalk, U; Wiedenmann, B; Rösch, Thomas.

In: J INTERN MED, Vol. 264, No. 4, 4, 2008, p. 370-378.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Pohl, H, Aschenbeck, J, Drossel, R, Schröder, A, Mayr, M, Koch, M, Rothe, K, Anders, M, Voderholzer, W, Hoffmann, J, Schulz, H-J, Liehr, R-M, Gottschalk, U, Wiedenmann, B & Rösch, T 2008, 'Endoscopy in Barrett's oesophagus: adherence to standards and neoplasia detection in the community practice versus hospital setting.', J INTERN MED, vol. 264, no. 4, 4, pp. 370-378. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18482289?dopt=Citation>

APA

Pohl, H., Aschenbeck, J., Drossel, R., Schröder, A., Mayr, M., Koch, M., Rothe, K., Anders, M., Voderholzer, W., Hoffmann, J., Schulz, H-J., Liehr, R-M., Gottschalk, U., Wiedenmann, B., & Rösch, T. (2008). Endoscopy in Barrett's oesophagus: adherence to standards and neoplasia detection in the community practice versus hospital setting. J INTERN MED, 264(4), 370-378. [4]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18482289?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Pohl H, Aschenbeck J, Drossel R, Schröder A, Mayr M, Koch M et al. Endoscopy in Barrett's oesophagus: adherence to standards and neoplasia detection in the community practice versus hospital setting. J INTERN MED. 2008;264(4):370-378. 4.

Bibtex

@article{a0f150df2437457e813248bda08db6e9,
title = "Endoscopy in Barrett's oesophagus: adherence to standards and neoplasia detection in the community practice versus hospital setting.",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Potential process differences between hospital and community-based endoscopy for Barrett's oesophagus have not been examined. We aimed at comparing adherence to guidelines and neoplasia detection rates in medical centres (MC) and community practices (CP). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: All histologically confirmed Barrett cases seen over a 3-year period in six MC and 19 CP covering a third of all upper gastrointestinal endoscopies (n = 126,000) performed annually in Berlin, Germany. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rate of relevant neoplasia (high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or more) in both settings in relation to adherence to standards. RESULTS: Of 1317 Barrett cases, 66% were seen in CP. CP patients had a shorter mean Barrett length (2.6 cm vs. 3.8 cm; P <0.001) with fewer biopsies taken during an examination (2.5 vs. 4.1 for Barrett length",
author = "H Pohl and J Aschenbeck and R Drossel and A Schr{\"o}der and M Mayr and M Koch and K Rothe and M Anders and W Voderholzer and J Hoffmann and H-J Schulz and R-M Liehr and U Gottschalk and B Wiedenmann and Thomas R{\"o}sch",
year = "2008",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "264",
pages = "370--378",
journal = "J INTERN MED",
issn = "0954-6820",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopy in Barrett's oesophagus: adherence to standards and neoplasia detection in the community practice versus hospital setting.

AU - Pohl, H

AU - Aschenbeck, J

AU - Drossel, R

AU - Schröder, A

AU - Mayr, M

AU - Koch, M

AU - Rothe, K

AU - Anders, M

AU - Voderholzer, W

AU - Hoffmann, J

AU - Schulz, H-J

AU - Liehr, R-M

AU - Gottschalk, U

AU - Wiedenmann, B

AU - Rösch, Thomas

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Potential process differences between hospital and community-based endoscopy for Barrett's oesophagus have not been examined. We aimed at comparing adherence to guidelines and neoplasia detection rates in medical centres (MC) and community practices (CP). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: All histologically confirmed Barrett cases seen over a 3-year period in six MC and 19 CP covering a third of all upper gastrointestinal endoscopies (n = 126,000) performed annually in Berlin, Germany. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rate of relevant neoplasia (high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or more) in both settings in relation to adherence to standards. RESULTS: Of 1317 Barrett cases, 66% were seen in CP. CP patients had a shorter mean Barrett length (2.6 cm vs. 3.8 cm; P <0.001) with fewer biopsies taken during an examination (2.5 vs. 4.1 for Barrett length

AB - OBJECTIVE: Potential process differences between hospital and community-based endoscopy for Barrett's oesophagus have not been examined. We aimed at comparing adherence to guidelines and neoplasia detection rates in medical centres (MC) and community practices (CP). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: All histologically confirmed Barrett cases seen over a 3-year period in six MC and 19 CP covering a third of all upper gastrointestinal endoscopies (n = 126,000) performed annually in Berlin, Germany. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Rate of relevant neoplasia (high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or more) in both settings in relation to adherence to standards. RESULTS: Of 1317 Barrett cases, 66% were seen in CP. CP patients had a shorter mean Barrett length (2.6 cm vs. 3.8 cm; P <0.001) with fewer biopsies taken during an examination (2.5 vs. 4.1 for Barrett length

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 264

SP - 370

EP - 378

JO - J INTERN MED

JF - J INTERN MED

SN - 0954-6820

IS - 4

M1 - 4

ER -