Emergency Use of Branched Thoracic Endovascular Repair in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologies

Standard

Emergency Use of Branched Thoracic Endovascular Repair in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologies. / Law, Yuk; Kölbel, Tilo; Detter, Christian; Rohlffs, Fiona; von Kodolitsch, Yskert; Makaloski, Vladimir; Debus, Eike Sebastian; Tsilimparis, Nikolaos.

In: ANN THORAC SURG, Vol. 107, No. 6, 06.2019, p. 1799-1806.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ba28b2ed089e4b909afd4c874cd5850c,
title = "Emergency Use of Branched Thoracic Endovascular Repair in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologies",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (b-TEVAR) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. However, b-TEVAR requires custom design and time for manufacturing, which limits its use in emergency situation.METHODS: We retrospectively studied a series of 11 patients, who underwent emergency b-TEVAR in our institution. Stent grafts were either already available for the patient or from another patient with similar anatomy. Study endpoints were technical success, 30-day mortality, perioperative complications, early reinterventions, and subsequent image follow-up.RESULTS: Between December 2012 and December 2017, 11 patients (5 male; age 67 ± 14 years) were treated emergently with b-TEVAR for type A dissection (n = 2), peripheral malperfusion despite ascending repair in type A dissection (n = 1), contained ruptured ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), symptomatic arch aneurysm (n = 4), and ruptured subclavian aneurysm (n = 2). Three patients received their personal custom-made endografts but were hospitalized and treated urgently because of new symptom onset; the remaining 8 patients were treated with endografts from other patients. Technical success was 100%. Thirty-day mortality was 9% (1 of 11). Perioperative complications included one major stroke (9%), one sepsis (9%), two respiratory failures (18%), one acute renal injury (9%), and one retroperitoneal hematoma (9%). There were five (45%) early reinterventions. With median 6 months (range, 1 to 28) of follow-up, 2 patients had persistent false lumen perfusion, whereas all supraaortic branches remained patent.CONCLUSIONS: Our experience provided an early insight to the feasibility and safety of b-TEVAR in an emergency situation, although the early reintervention rate was not negligible. The endograft was versatile, with potential off-the-shelf use in future.",
keywords = "Aged, Aorta, Thoracic, Aortic Diseases/surgery, Emergency Treatment, Endovascular Procedures/methods, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies",
author = "Yuk Law and Tilo K{\"o}lbel and Christian Detter and Fiona Rohlffs and {von Kodolitsch}, Yskert and Vladimir Makaloski and Debus, {Eike Sebastian} and Nikolaos Tsilimparis",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.09.020",
language = "English",
volume = "107",
pages = "1799--1806",
journal = "ANN THORAC SURG",
issn = "0003-4975",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency Use of Branched Thoracic Endovascular Repair in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologies

AU - Law, Yuk

AU - Kölbel, Tilo

AU - Detter, Christian

AU - Rohlffs, Fiona

AU - von Kodolitsch, Yskert

AU - Makaloski, Vladimir

AU - Debus, Eike Sebastian

AU - Tsilimparis, Nikolaos

N1 - Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: Branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (b-TEVAR) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. However, b-TEVAR requires custom design and time for manufacturing, which limits its use in emergency situation.METHODS: We retrospectively studied a series of 11 patients, who underwent emergency b-TEVAR in our institution. Stent grafts were either already available for the patient or from another patient with similar anatomy. Study endpoints were technical success, 30-day mortality, perioperative complications, early reinterventions, and subsequent image follow-up.RESULTS: Between December 2012 and December 2017, 11 patients (5 male; age 67 ± 14 years) were treated emergently with b-TEVAR for type A dissection (n = 2), peripheral malperfusion despite ascending repair in type A dissection (n = 1), contained ruptured ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), symptomatic arch aneurysm (n = 4), and ruptured subclavian aneurysm (n = 2). Three patients received their personal custom-made endografts but were hospitalized and treated urgently because of new symptom onset; the remaining 8 patients were treated with endografts from other patients. Technical success was 100%. Thirty-day mortality was 9% (1 of 11). Perioperative complications included one major stroke (9%), one sepsis (9%), two respiratory failures (18%), one acute renal injury (9%), and one retroperitoneal hematoma (9%). There were five (45%) early reinterventions. With median 6 months (range, 1 to 28) of follow-up, 2 patients had persistent false lumen perfusion, whereas all supraaortic branches remained patent.CONCLUSIONS: Our experience provided an early insight to the feasibility and safety of b-TEVAR in an emergency situation, although the early reintervention rate was not negligible. The endograft was versatile, with potential off-the-shelf use in future.

AB - BACKGROUND: Branched thoracic endovascular aortic repair (b-TEVAR) has revolutionized the treatment of aortic arch pathologies. However, b-TEVAR requires custom design and time for manufacturing, which limits its use in emergency situation.METHODS: We retrospectively studied a series of 11 patients, who underwent emergency b-TEVAR in our institution. Stent grafts were either already available for the patient or from another patient with similar anatomy. Study endpoints were technical success, 30-day mortality, perioperative complications, early reinterventions, and subsequent image follow-up.RESULTS: Between December 2012 and December 2017, 11 patients (5 male; age 67 ± 14 years) were treated emergently with b-TEVAR for type A dissection (n = 2), peripheral malperfusion despite ascending repair in type A dissection (n = 1), contained ruptured ascending aortic pseudoaneurysm (n = 2), symptomatic arch aneurysm (n = 4), and ruptured subclavian aneurysm (n = 2). Three patients received their personal custom-made endografts but were hospitalized and treated urgently because of new symptom onset; the remaining 8 patients were treated with endografts from other patients. Technical success was 100%. Thirty-day mortality was 9% (1 of 11). Perioperative complications included one major stroke (9%), one sepsis (9%), two respiratory failures (18%), one acute renal injury (9%), and one retroperitoneal hematoma (9%). There were five (45%) early reinterventions. With median 6 months (range, 1 to 28) of follow-up, 2 patients had persistent false lumen perfusion, whereas all supraaortic branches remained patent.CONCLUSIONS: Our experience provided an early insight to the feasibility and safety of b-TEVAR in an emergency situation, although the early reintervention rate was not negligible. The endograft was versatile, with potential off-the-shelf use in future.

KW - Aged

KW - Aorta, Thoracic

KW - Aortic Diseases/surgery

KW - Emergency Treatment

KW - Endovascular Procedures/methods

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Retrospective Studies

U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.09.020

DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.09.020

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30389447

VL - 107

SP - 1799

EP - 1806

JO - ANN THORAC SURG

JF - ANN THORAC SURG

SN - 0003-4975

IS - 6

ER -