Research ExplorerPublicationsElektive endovaskuläre versus operative Therapie des Bauchao...

Elektive endovaskuläre versus operative Therapie des Bauchaortenaneurysmas – aktuelle Langzeitdaten

Standard

Elektive endovaskuläre versus operative Therapie des Bauchaortenaneurysmas – aktuelle Langzeitdaten. / Honig, Susanne; Kölbel, Tilo; Panuccio, Giuseppe; Wipper, Sabine; Debus, Eike Sebastian.

In: DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR, Vol. 145, No. 7, 04.2020, p. 418-422.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Honig, S, Kölbel, T, Panuccio, G, Wipper, S & Debus, ES 2020, 'Elektive endovaskuläre versus operative Therapie des Bauchaortenaneurysmas – aktuelle Langzeitdaten', DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR, vol. 145, no. 7, pp. 418-422. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0956-4325

APA

Honig, S., Kölbel, T., Panuccio, G., Wipper, S., & Debus, E. S. (2020). Elektive endovaskuläre versus operative Therapie des Bauchaortenaneurysmas – aktuelle Langzeitdaten. DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR, 145(7), 418-422. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0956-4325

Vancouver

Honig S, Kölbel T, Panuccio G, Wipper S, Debus ES. Elektive endovaskuläre versus operative Therapie des Bauchaortenaneurysmas – aktuelle Langzeitdaten. DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR. 2020 Apr;145(7):418-422. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0956-4325

Bibtex

@article{1d79ba3f03db4f539172544a9d921f97,
title = "Elektive endovaskul{\"a}re versus operative Therapie des Bauchaortenaneurysmas – aktuelle Langzeitdaten",
abstract = "Four randomized clinical trials prospectively compared endovascular (EVAR) and open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): Chronologically these are EVAR 1 (UK), DREAM (Netherlands), OVER (USA) and ACE (France). All of them investigated whether the superior early postoperative outcome of endovascular repair is maintained in the long-term. The longest follow-up data of EVAR 1, with a mean person-years observation (either until death or end of study) of 8 years, clearly question the superiority of EVAR. In this context, open repair of AAA takes on a new significance and the indication for endovascular repair should be critically assessed with regard to the long-term course. Indication for invasive treatment has not changed and should - apart from exceptions - only be given for men with a diameter of 5,5 cm or more. Furthermore, current studies on prophylactic mesh reinforcement after open repair of AAA show that incisional hernias can be safely avoided.",
keywords = "Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery, Elective Surgical Procedures, Endovascular Procedures, Female, Humans, Male, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Thoracic Surgical Procedures",
author = "Susanne Honig and Tilo K{\"o}lbel and Giuseppe Panuccio and Sabine Wipper and Debus, {Eike Sebastian}",
note = "{\textcopyright} Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1055/a-0956-4325",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "145",
pages = "418--422",
journal = "DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR",
issn = "0012-0472",
publisher = "Georg Thieme Verlag KG",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Elektive endovaskuläre versus operative Therapie des Bauchaortenaneurysmas – aktuelle Langzeitdaten

AU - Honig, Susanne

AU - Kölbel, Tilo

AU - Panuccio, Giuseppe

AU - Wipper, Sabine

AU - Debus, Eike Sebastian

N1 - © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

PY - 2020/4

Y1 - 2020/4

N2 - Four randomized clinical trials prospectively compared endovascular (EVAR) and open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): Chronologically these are EVAR 1 (UK), DREAM (Netherlands), OVER (USA) and ACE (France). All of them investigated whether the superior early postoperative outcome of endovascular repair is maintained in the long-term. The longest follow-up data of EVAR 1, with a mean person-years observation (either until death or end of study) of 8 years, clearly question the superiority of EVAR. In this context, open repair of AAA takes on a new significance and the indication for endovascular repair should be critically assessed with regard to the long-term course. Indication for invasive treatment has not changed and should - apart from exceptions - only be given for men with a diameter of 5,5 cm or more. Furthermore, current studies on prophylactic mesh reinforcement after open repair of AAA show that incisional hernias can be safely avoided.

AB - Four randomized clinical trials prospectively compared endovascular (EVAR) and open repair (OR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA): Chronologically these are EVAR 1 (UK), DREAM (Netherlands), OVER (USA) and ACE (France). All of them investigated whether the superior early postoperative outcome of endovascular repair is maintained in the long-term. The longest follow-up data of EVAR 1, with a mean person-years observation (either until death or end of study) of 8 years, clearly question the superiority of EVAR. In this context, open repair of AAA takes on a new significance and the indication for endovascular repair should be critically assessed with regard to the long-term course. Indication for invasive treatment has not changed and should - apart from exceptions - only be given for men with a diameter of 5,5 cm or more. Furthermore, current studies on prophylactic mesh reinforcement after open repair of AAA show that incisional hernias can be safely avoided.

KW - Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery

KW - Elective Surgical Procedures

KW - Endovascular Procedures

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

KW - Thoracic Surgical Procedures

U2 - 10.1055/a-0956-4325

DO - 10.1055/a-0956-4325

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 32236919

VL - 145

SP - 418

EP - 422

JO - DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR

JF - DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR

SN - 0012-0472

IS - 7

ER -