Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide, vs Mesalazine or Placebo, as Induction Therapy for Lymphocytic Colitis

Standard

Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide, vs Mesalazine or Placebo, as Induction Therapy for Lymphocytic Colitis. / BUG-1/LMC Study Group.

In: GASTROENTEROLOGY, Vol. 155, No. 6, 12.2018, p. 1795-1804.e3.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{f9bca762911c4d4b9e557137477b27e4,
title = "Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide, vs Mesalazine or Placebo, as Induction Therapy for Lymphocytic Colitis",
abstract = "BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lymphocytic colitis is a common cause of chronic, nonbloody diarrhea. However, the effects of treatment are unclear and randomized placebo-controlled trials were requested in a Cochrane review. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate budesonide and mesalazine as induction therapy for lymphocytic colitis.METHODS: Patients with active lymphocytic colitis were randomly assigned to groups given budesonide 9 mg once daily (Budenofalk granules), mesalazine 3 g once daily (Salofalk granules), or placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy design. The primary endpoint was clinical remission, defined as ≤21 stools (including ≤6 watery stools), in the 7 days before week 8.RESULTS: The final analysis included 57 patients (19 per group). Most patients were female (72%) and the mean age was 59 years. The proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group than in the placebo group (intention-to-treat analysis, 79% vs 42%; P = .01). The difference in proportions of patients in clinical remission at week 8 between the mesalazine (63%) and placebo groups was not significant (P = .09). The proportion of patients with histologic remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group (68%) vs the mesalazine (26%; P = .02) or placebo (21%; P = .008) groups. The incidence of adverse events was 47.4% in the budesonide group, 68.4% in the mesalazine group, and 42.1% in the placebo group.CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized multicenter study, we found oral budesonide 9 mg once daily to be effective and safe for induction of clinical and histologic remission in patients with lymphocytic colitis, compared with placebo. Oral mesalazine 3 g once daily was not significantly better than placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01209208.",
keywords = "Administration, Oral, Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage, Budesonide/administration & dosage, Colitis, Lymphocytic/drug therapy, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Induction Chemotherapy, Male, Mesalamine/administration & dosage, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Stephan Miehlke and Daniela Aust and Emese Mihaly and Peter Armerding and G{\"u}nther B{\"o}hm and Ole Bonderup and Fernando Fern{\'a}ndez-Ba{\~n}ares and Juozas Kupcinskas and Munck, {Lars Kristian} and Kai-Uwe Rehbehn and Tanju Nacak and Roland Greinwald and Andreas M{\"u}nch and {BUG-1/LMC Study Group}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2018",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.042",
language = "English",
volume = "155",
pages = "1795--1804.e3",
journal = "GASTROENTEROLOGY",
issn = "0016-5085",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide, vs Mesalazine or Placebo, as Induction Therapy for Lymphocytic Colitis

AU - Miehlke, Stephan

AU - Aust, Daniela

AU - Mihaly, Emese

AU - Armerding, Peter

AU - Böhm, Günther

AU - Bonderup, Ole

AU - Fernández-Bañares, Fernando

AU - Kupcinskas, Juozas

AU - Munck, Lars Kristian

AU - Rehbehn, Kai-Uwe

AU - Nacak, Tanju

AU - Greinwald, Roland

AU - Münch, Andreas

AU - BUG-1/LMC Study Group

N1 - Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lymphocytic colitis is a common cause of chronic, nonbloody diarrhea. However, the effects of treatment are unclear and randomized placebo-controlled trials were requested in a Cochrane review. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate budesonide and mesalazine as induction therapy for lymphocytic colitis.METHODS: Patients with active lymphocytic colitis were randomly assigned to groups given budesonide 9 mg once daily (Budenofalk granules), mesalazine 3 g once daily (Salofalk granules), or placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy design. The primary endpoint was clinical remission, defined as ≤21 stools (including ≤6 watery stools), in the 7 days before week 8.RESULTS: The final analysis included 57 patients (19 per group). Most patients were female (72%) and the mean age was 59 years. The proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group than in the placebo group (intention-to-treat analysis, 79% vs 42%; P = .01). The difference in proportions of patients in clinical remission at week 8 between the mesalazine (63%) and placebo groups was not significant (P = .09). The proportion of patients with histologic remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group (68%) vs the mesalazine (26%; P = .02) or placebo (21%; P = .008) groups. The incidence of adverse events was 47.4% in the budesonide group, 68.4% in the mesalazine group, and 42.1% in the placebo group.CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized multicenter study, we found oral budesonide 9 mg once daily to be effective and safe for induction of clinical and histologic remission in patients with lymphocytic colitis, compared with placebo. Oral mesalazine 3 g once daily was not significantly better than placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01209208.

AB - BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lymphocytic colitis is a common cause of chronic, nonbloody diarrhea. However, the effects of treatment are unclear and randomized placebo-controlled trials were requested in a Cochrane review. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate budesonide and mesalazine as induction therapy for lymphocytic colitis.METHODS: Patients with active lymphocytic colitis were randomly assigned to groups given budesonide 9 mg once daily (Budenofalk granules), mesalazine 3 g once daily (Salofalk granules), or placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind, double-dummy design. The primary endpoint was clinical remission, defined as ≤21 stools (including ≤6 watery stools), in the 7 days before week 8.RESULTS: The final analysis included 57 patients (19 per group). Most patients were female (72%) and the mean age was 59 years. The proportion of patients in clinical remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group than in the placebo group (intention-to-treat analysis, 79% vs 42%; P = .01). The difference in proportions of patients in clinical remission at week 8 between the mesalazine (63%) and placebo groups was not significant (P = .09). The proportion of patients with histologic remission at week 8 was significantly higher in the budesonide group (68%) vs the mesalazine (26%; P = .02) or placebo (21%; P = .008) groups. The incidence of adverse events was 47.4% in the budesonide group, 68.4% in the mesalazine group, and 42.1% in the placebo group.CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized multicenter study, we found oral budesonide 9 mg once daily to be effective and safe for induction of clinical and histologic remission in patients with lymphocytic colitis, compared with placebo. Oral mesalazine 3 g once daily was not significantly better than placebo. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01209208.

KW - Administration, Oral

KW - Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage

KW - Budesonide/administration & dosage

KW - Colitis, Lymphocytic/drug therapy

KW - Double-Blind Method

KW - Drug Administration Schedule

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Induction Chemotherapy

KW - Male

KW - Mesalamine/administration & dosage

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.042

DO - 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.042

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 30195447

VL - 155

SP - 1795-1804.e3

JO - GASTROENTEROLOGY

JF - GASTROENTEROLOGY

SN - 0016-5085

IS - 6

ER -