Effects of intense assessment on statistical power in randomized controlled trials: Simulation study on depression

Standard

Effects of intense assessment on statistical power in randomized controlled trials: Simulation study on depression. / Schuster, Raphael; Schreyer, Manuela Larissa; Kaiser, Tim; Berger, Thomas; Klein, Jan Philipp; Moritz, Steffen; Laireiter, Anton-Rupert; Trutschnig, Wolfgang.

In: INTERNET INTERV, Vol. 20, 04.2020, p. 100313.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Schuster, R, Schreyer, ML, Kaiser, T, Berger, T, Klein, JP, Moritz, S, Laireiter, A-R & Trutschnig, W 2020, 'Effects of intense assessment on statistical power in randomized controlled trials: Simulation study on depression', INTERNET INTERV, vol. 20, pp. 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100313

APA

Schuster, R., Schreyer, M. L., Kaiser, T., Berger, T., Klein, J. P., Moritz, S., Laireiter, A-R., & Trutschnig, W. (2020). Effects of intense assessment on statistical power in randomized controlled trials: Simulation study on depression. INTERNET INTERV, 20, 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100313

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{47e87df72c1d4757bd552446a73917c7,
title = "Effects of intense assessment on statistical power in randomized controlled trials: Simulation study on depression",
abstract = "Smartphone-based devices are increasingly recognized to assess disease symptoms in daily life (e.g. ecological momentary assessment, EMA). Despite this development in digital psychiatry, clinical trials are mainly based on point assessments of psychopathology. This study investigated expectable increases in statistical power by intense assessment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A simulation study, based on three scenarios and several empirical data sets, estimated power gains of two- or fivefold pre-post-assessment. For each condition, data sets of various effect sizes were generated, and AN(C)OVAs were applied to the sample of interest (N = 50-N = 200). Power increases ranged from 6% to 92%, with higher gains in more underpowered scenarios and with higher number of repeated assessments. ANCOVA profited from a more precise estimation of the baseline covariate, resulting in additional gains in statistical power. Fivefold pre-post EMA resulted in highest absolute statistical power and clearly outperformed traditional questionnaire assessments. For example, ANCOVA of automatized PHQ-9 questionnaire data resulted in absolute power of 55 (for N = 200 and d = 0.3). Fivefold EMA, however, resulted in power of 88.9. Non-parametric and multi-level analyses resulted in comparable outcomes. Besides providing psychological treatment, digital mental health can help optimizing sensitivity in RCT-based research. Intense assessment appears advisable whenever psychopathology needs to be assessed with high precision at pre- and post-assessment (e.g. small sample sizes, small treatment effects, or when applying optimization problems like machine learning). First empiric studies are promising, but more evidence is needed. Simulations for various effects and a short guide for popular power software are provided for study planning.",
author = "Raphael Schuster and Schreyer, {Manuela Larissa} and Tim Kaiser and Thomas Berger and Klein, {Jan Philipp} and Steffen Moritz and Anton-Rupert Laireiter and Wolfgang Trutschnig",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2020 The Authors.",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.invent.2020.100313",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "100313",
journal = "INTERNET INTERV",
issn = "2214-7829",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of intense assessment on statistical power in randomized controlled trials: Simulation study on depression

AU - Schuster, Raphael

AU - Schreyer, Manuela Larissa

AU - Kaiser, Tim

AU - Berger, Thomas

AU - Klein, Jan Philipp

AU - Moritz, Steffen

AU - Laireiter, Anton-Rupert

AU - Trutschnig, Wolfgang

N1 - © 2020 The Authors.

PY - 2020/4

Y1 - 2020/4

N2 - Smartphone-based devices are increasingly recognized to assess disease symptoms in daily life (e.g. ecological momentary assessment, EMA). Despite this development in digital psychiatry, clinical trials are mainly based on point assessments of psychopathology. This study investigated expectable increases in statistical power by intense assessment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A simulation study, based on three scenarios and several empirical data sets, estimated power gains of two- or fivefold pre-post-assessment. For each condition, data sets of various effect sizes were generated, and AN(C)OVAs were applied to the sample of interest (N = 50-N = 200). Power increases ranged from 6% to 92%, with higher gains in more underpowered scenarios and with higher number of repeated assessments. ANCOVA profited from a more precise estimation of the baseline covariate, resulting in additional gains in statistical power. Fivefold pre-post EMA resulted in highest absolute statistical power and clearly outperformed traditional questionnaire assessments. For example, ANCOVA of automatized PHQ-9 questionnaire data resulted in absolute power of 55 (for N = 200 and d = 0.3). Fivefold EMA, however, resulted in power of 88.9. Non-parametric and multi-level analyses resulted in comparable outcomes. Besides providing psychological treatment, digital mental health can help optimizing sensitivity in RCT-based research. Intense assessment appears advisable whenever psychopathology needs to be assessed with high precision at pre- and post-assessment (e.g. small sample sizes, small treatment effects, or when applying optimization problems like machine learning). First empiric studies are promising, but more evidence is needed. Simulations for various effects and a short guide for popular power software are provided for study planning.

AB - Smartphone-based devices are increasingly recognized to assess disease symptoms in daily life (e.g. ecological momentary assessment, EMA). Despite this development in digital psychiatry, clinical trials are mainly based on point assessments of psychopathology. This study investigated expectable increases in statistical power by intense assessment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A simulation study, based on three scenarios and several empirical data sets, estimated power gains of two- or fivefold pre-post-assessment. For each condition, data sets of various effect sizes were generated, and AN(C)OVAs were applied to the sample of interest (N = 50-N = 200). Power increases ranged from 6% to 92%, with higher gains in more underpowered scenarios and with higher number of repeated assessments. ANCOVA profited from a more precise estimation of the baseline covariate, resulting in additional gains in statistical power. Fivefold pre-post EMA resulted in highest absolute statistical power and clearly outperformed traditional questionnaire assessments. For example, ANCOVA of automatized PHQ-9 questionnaire data resulted in absolute power of 55 (for N = 200 and d = 0.3). Fivefold EMA, however, resulted in power of 88.9. Non-parametric and multi-level analyses resulted in comparable outcomes. Besides providing psychological treatment, digital mental health can help optimizing sensitivity in RCT-based research. Intense assessment appears advisable whenever psychopathology needs to be assessed with high precision at pre- and post-assessment (e.g. small sample sizes, small treatment effects, or when applying optimization problems like machine learning). First empiric studies are promising, but more evidence is needed. Simulations for various effects and a short guide for popular power software are provided for study planning.

U2 - 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100313

DO - 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100313

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 32215257

VL - 20

SP - 100313

JO - INTERNET INTERV

JF - INTERNET INTERV

SN - 2214-7829

ER -