Effects of different information brochures on women's decision-making regarding mammography Screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled questionnaire study

Standard

Effects of different information brochures on women's decision-making regarding mammography Screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled questionnaire study. / Gummersbach, Elisabeth; in der Schmitten, Jürgen; Abholz, Heinz-Harald; Wegscheider, Karl; Pentzek, Michael.

In: TRIALS, Vol. 14, 01.01.2013, p. 319.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{9206e6fa496341428c101edab9344d22,
title = "Effects of different information brochures on women's decision-making regarding mammography Screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled questionnaire study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In order to give informed consent for mammography screening, women need to be told the relevant facts; however, screening information often remains vague because of the worry that detailed information might deter women from participating in recommended screening programs. Since September 2010, German women aged 50 to 69 invited for mammography screening have received a new, comprehensive information brochure that frankly discusses the potential benefit and harm of mammography screening. In contrast, the brochure that was in use before September 2010 contained little relevant information.The aim of this study is to compare the impact of the two different brochures on the intention of women to undergo mammography screening, and to broaden our understanding of the effect that factual information has on the women's decision-making.METHODS: This is a controlled questionnaire study comparing knowledge, views and hypothetical preferences of women aged 48-49 years after receiving the old versus the new information brochure. German GP's in the region of North Rhine-Westfalia will be asked by mail and telephone to participate in the study. Eligible women will be recruited via their general practitioners (GPs) and randomized to groups A ('new brochure') and B ('old brochure'), with an intended recruitment of 173 participants per group. The study is powered to detect a 15% higher or lower intention to undergo mammography screening in women informed by the new brochure.DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to our understanding of the decision-making of women invited to mammography screening. From both ethical and public health perspectives, it is important to know whether frank, factual information leads to a change in the intention of women to participate in a recommended breast cancer screening program.TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00004271.",
author = "Elisabeth Gummersbach and {in der Schmitten}, J{\"u}rgen and Heinz-Harald Abholz and Karl Wegscheider and Michael Pentzek",
year = "2013",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/1745-6215-14-319",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "319",
journal = "TRIALS",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "Current Controlled Trials Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of different information brochures on women's decision-making regarding mammography Screening: study protocol for a randomized controlled questionnaire study

AU - Gummersbach, Elisabeth

AU - in der Schmitten, Jürgen

AU - Abholz, Heinz-Harald

AU - Wegscheider, Karl

AU - Pentzek, Michael

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: In order to give informed consent for mammography screening, women need to be told the relevant facts; however, screening information often remains vague because of the worry that detailed information might deter women from participating in recommended screening programs. Since September 2010, German women aged 50 to 69 invited for mammography screening have received a new, comprehensive information brochure that frankly discusses the potential benefit and harm of mammography screening. In contrast, the brochure that was in use before September 2010 contained little relevant information.The aim of this study is to compare the impact of the two different brochures on the intention of women to undergo mammography screening, and to broaden our understanding of the effect that factual information has on the women's decision-making.METHODS: This is a controlled questionnaire study comparing knowledge, views and hypothetical preferences of women aged 48-49 years after receiving the old versus the new information brochure. German GP's in the region of North Rhine-Westfalia will be asked by mail and telephone to participate in the study. Eligible women will be recruited via their general practitioners (GPs) and randomized to groups A ('new brochure') and B ('old brochure'), with an intended recruitment of 173 participants per group. The study is powered to detect a 15% higher or lower intention to undergo mammography screening in women informed by the new brochure.DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to our understanding of the decision-making of women invited to mammography screening. From both ethical and public health perspectives, it is important to know whether frank, factual information leads to a change in the intention of women to participate in a recommended breast cancer screening program.TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00004271.

AB - BACKGROUND: In order to give informed consent for mammography screening, women need to be told the relevant facts; however, screening information often remains vague because of the worry that detailed information might deter women from participating in recommended screening programs. Since September 2010, German women aged 50 to 69 invited for mammography screening have received a new, comprehensive information brochure that frankly discusses the potential benefit and harm of mammography screening. In contrast, the brochure that was in use before September 2010 contained little relevant information.The aim of this study is to compare the impact of the two different brochures on the intention of women to undergo mammography screening, and to broaden our understanding of the effect that factual information has on the women's decision-making.METHODS: This is a controlled questionnaire study comparing knowledge, views and hypothetical preferences of women aged 48-49 years after receiving the old versus the new information brochure. German GP's in the region of North Rhine-Westfalia will be asked by mail and telephone to participate in the study. Eligible women will be recruited via their general practitioners (GPs) and randomized to groups A ('new brochure') and B ('old brochure'), with an intended recruitment of 173 participants per group. The study is powered to detect a 15% higher or lower intention to undergo mammography screening in women informed by the new brochure.DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to our understanding of the decision-making of women invited to mammography screening. From both ethical and public health perspectives, it is important to know whether frank, factual information leads to a change in the intention of women to participate in a recommended breast cancer screening program.TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00004271.

U2 - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-319

DO - 10.1186/1745-6215-14-319

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24083811

VL - 14

SP - 319

JO - TRIALS

JF - TRIALS

SN - 1745-6215

ER -