Effect of depression, anxiety, and distress screeners on the need, intention, and utilization of psychosocial support services among cancer patients

Standard

Effect of depression, anxiety, and distress screeners on the need, intention, and utilization of psychosocial support services among cancer patients. / Springer, Franziska; Sautier, Leon; Schilling, Georgia; Koch-Gromus, Uwe; Bokemeyer, Carsten; Friedrich, Michael; Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Anja; Esser, Peter.

In: SUPPORT CARE CANCER, Vol. 31, No. 2, 16.01.2023, p. 117.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{ef6c2e4233e7495389b366f329db7d3a,
title = "Effect of depression, anxiety, and distress screeners on the need, intention, and utilization of psychosocial support services among cancer patients",
abstract = "PURPOSE: In clinical cancer care, distress screening is recommended to identify highly burdened patients in objective need for psychosocial support to improve psychological distress and quality of life and to enhance patient empowerment. It is however unclear whether distress screeners are suitable for psychosocial care planning and thus whether they can predict the willingness that is need, intention, and utilization, to seek psychosocial support.METHODS: In a secondary analysis of a cluster intervention study, we assessed cancer patients with three distress screeners (DT, PHQ-9, GAD-7) at baseline. The willingness to seek psychosocial support services was assessed binary for psychosocial services at 3 and 6 months. Logistic regression models were applied to examine the predictive effect of the screeners on need, intention, and utilization. We corrected all models for multiple testing.RESULTS: The 660 patients included in the study were on average 60 years, 54% were male. At the 3- and 6-month follow-up, 353 and 259 patients participated, respectively. The screeners were best in predicting the need for support (OR reaching up to 1.15, 1.20, and 1.22 for the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and DT respectively). The intention was predicted by the PHQ-9 and GAD-7, whereas utilization of psychosocial support services was not predicted by the screeners.CONCLUSION: The three distress screeners might be useful in psychosocial care planning, as they are able to predict the need and to some degree the intention to seek psychosocial support. Future research needs to examine potential barriers and supporting factors that may explain utilization of psychosocial support.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered (2/2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT04749056).",
author = "Franziska Springer and Leon Sautier and Georgia Schilling and Uwe Koch-Gromus and Carsten Bokemeyer and Michael Friedrich and Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf and Peter Esser",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2023. The Author(s).",
year = "2023",
month = jan,
day = "16",
doi = "10.1007/s00520-023-07580-2",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "117",
journal = "SUPPORT CARE CANCER",
issn = "0941-4355",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of depression, anxiety, and distress screeners on the need, intention, and utilization of psychosocial support services among cancer patients

AU - Springer, Franziska

AU - Sautier, Leon

AU - Schilling, Georgia

AU - Koch-Gromus, Uwe

AU - Bokemeyer, Carsten

AU - Friedrich, Michael

AU - Mehnert-Theuerkauf, Anja

AU - Esser, Peter

N1 - © 2023. The Author(s).

PY - 2023/1/16

Y1 - 2023/1/16

N2 - PURPOSE: In clinical cancer care, distress screening is recommended to identify highly burdened patients in objective need for psychosocial support to improve psychological distress and quality of life and to enhance patient empowerment. It is however unclear whether distress screeners are suitable for psychosocial care planning and thus whether they can predict the willingness that is need, intention, and utilization, to seek psychosocial support.METHODS: In a secondary analysis of a cluster intervention study, we assessed cancer patients with three distress screeners (DT, PHQ-9, GAD-7) at baseline. The willingness to seek psychosocial support services was assessed binary for psychosocial services at 3 and 6 months. Logistic regression models were applied to examine the predictive effect of the screeners on need, intention, and utilization. We corrected all models for multiple testing.RESULTS: The 660 patients included in the study were on average 60 years, 54% were male. At the 3- and 6-month follow-up, 353 and 259 patients participated, respectively. The screeners were best in predicting the need for support (OR reaching up to 1.15, 1.20, and 1.22 for the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and DT respectively). The intention was predicted by the PHQ-9 and GAD-7, whereas utilization of psychosocial support services was not predicted by the screeners.CONCLUSION: The three distress screeners might be useful in psychosocial care planning, as they are able to predict the need and to some degree the intention to seek psychosocial support. Future research needs to examine potential barriers and supporting factors that may explain utilization of psychosocial support.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered (2/2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT04749056).

AB - PURPOSE: In clinical cancer care, distress screening is recommended to identify highly burdened patients in objective need for psychosocial support to improve psychological distress and quality of life and to enhance patient empowerment. It is however unclear whether distress screeners are suitable for psychosocial care planning and thus whether they can predict the willingness that is need, intention, and utilization, to seek psychosocial support.METHODS: In a secondary analysis of a cluster intervention study, we assessed cancer patients with three distress screeners (DT, PHQ-9, GAD-7) at baseline. The willingness to seek psychosocial support services was assessed binary for psychosocial services at 3 and 6 months. Logistic regression models were applied to examine the predictive effect of the screeners on need, intention, and utilization. We corrected all models for multiple testing.RESULTS: The 660 patients included in the study were on average 60 years, 54% were male. At the 3- and 6-month follow-up, 353 and 259 patients participated, respectively. The screeners were best in predicting the need for support (OR reaching up to 1.15, 1.20, and 1.22 for the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and DT respectively). The intention was predicted by the PHQ-9 and GAD-7, whereas utilization of psychosocial support services was not predicted by the screeners.CONCLUSION: The three distress screeners might be useful in psychosocial care planning, as they are able to predict the need and to some degree the intention to seek psychosocial support. Future research needs to examine potential barriers and supporting factors that may explain utilization of psychosocial support.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered (2/2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT04749056).

U2 - 10.1007/s00520-023-07580-2

DO - 10.1007/s00520-023-07580-2

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 36645499

VL - 31

SP - 117

JO - SUPPORT CARE CANCER

JF - SUPPORT CARE CANCER

SN - 0941-4355

IS - 2

ER -