[DRGs and daily rates of pay in psychosomatics: 2002-2005]

TY - JOUR

T1 - [DRGs and daily rates of pay in psychosomatics: 2002-2005]

AU - Lohmann, Rüdiger

AU - Rose, Matthias

AU - Danzer, Gerhard

AU - Herzog, Wolfgang

AU - Riegel, Theo

AU - Klapp, Burghard F

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - OBJECTIVES: Over the last years the use of diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) was introduced into most areas of the German health care system, which led to changed compensation for departments outside the G-DRG system as well. We evaluated the development of revenues in 17 different psychosomatic departments over the last three years. METHODS: Our analyses were based on official daily rates for each of the clinics included. If daily rates changed within one year, we used the average daily rate for that year. RESULTS: Together all departments provided 547 in-patient beds for the treatment of acute psychosomatic patients. With 85% occupancy all departments would achieve a revenue of 62.5 million euro in 2005, two million euro less than three years previously. Due to the introduction of the German DRG system their average income was reduced by approx. 3%. The loss was greater for psychosomatic departments at larger hospitals, which have a higher percentage of departments included in the G-DRG system. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the G-DRG system leads to reduced revenues for departments outside the G-DRG system, while performance was expected to remain at the same level and costs have increased. Thus, to ensure the spectrum of psychosomatic medicine as it is today, it has become increasingly important to demonstrate the real costs of treatment to political decision makers.

AB - OBJECTIVES: Over the last years the use of diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) was introduced into most areas of the German health care system, which led to changed compensation for departments outside the G-DRG system as well. We evaluated the development of revenues in 17 different psychosomatic departments over the last three years. METHODS: Our analyses were based on official daily rates for each of the clinics included. If daily rates changed within one year, we used the average daily rate for that year. RESULTS: Together all departments provided 547 in-patient beds for the treatment of acute psychosomatic patients. With 85% occupancy all departments would achieve a revenue of 62.5 million euro in 2005, two million euro less than three years previously. Due to the introduction of the German DRG system their average income was reduced by approx. 3%. The loss was greater for psychosomatic departments at larger hospitals, which have a higher percentage of departments included in the G-DRG system. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the G-DRG system leads to reduced revenues for departments outside the G-DRG system, while performance was expected to remain at the same level and costs have increased. Thus, to ensure the spectrum of psychosomatic medicine as it is today, it has become increasingly important to demonstrate the real costs of treatment to political decision makers.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 53

SP - 29

EP - 41

JO - Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC

JF - Z PSYCHOSOM MED PSYC

SN - 1438-3608

IS - 1

M1 - 1

ER -