Does usage of a parachute in contrast to free fall prevent major trauma? a prospective randomised-controlled trial in rag dolls

Standard

Does usage of a parachute in contrast to free fall prevent major trauma? a prospective randomised-controlled trial in rag dolls. / Czorlich, Patrick; Burkhardt, Till; Buhk, Jan Hendrik; Matschke, Jakob; Dreimann, Marc; Schmidt, Nils Ole; Eicker, Sven Oliver.

In: EUR SPINE J, Vol. 25, No. 5, 01.05.2016, p. 1349-54.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{d67bb68c1fa74c4dbac1e7da21f2d369,
title = "Does usage of a parachute in contrast to free fall prevent major trauma? a prospective randomised-controlled trial in rag dolls",
abstract = "PURPOSE: It is undisputed for more than 200 years that the use of a parachute prevents major trauma when falling from a great height. Nevertheless up to date no prospective randomised controlled trial has proven the superiority in preventing trauma when falling from a great height instead of a free fall. The aim of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to prove the effectiveness of a parachute when falling from great height.METHODS: In this prospective randomised-controlled trial a commercially acquirable rag doll was prepared for the purposes of the study design as in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki, the participation of human beings in this trial was impossible. Twenty-five falls were performed with a parachute compatible to the height and weight of the doll. In the control group, another 25 falls were realised without a parachute. The main outcome measures were the rate of head injury; cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic fractures; and pneumothoraxes, hepatic, spleen, and bladder injuries in the control and parachute groups. An interdisciplinary team consisting of a specialised trauma surgeon, two neurosurgeons, and a coroner examined the rag doll for injuries. Additionally, whole-body computed tomography scans were performed to identify the injuries.RESULTS: All 50 falls-25 with the use of a parachute, 25 without a parachute-were successfully performed. Head injuries (right hemisphere p = 0.008, left hemisphere p = 0.004), cervical trauma (p < 0.001), thoracic trauma (p < 0.001), lumbar trauma (p < 0.001), pelvic trauma (p < 0.001), and hepatic, spleen, and bladder injures (p < 0.001) occurred more often in the control group. Only the pneumothoraxes showed no statistically significant difference between the control and parachute groups.CONCLUSIONS: A parachute is an effective tool to prevent major trauma when falling from a great height.",
author = "Patrick Czorlich and Till Burkhardt and Buhk, {Jan Hendrik} and Jakob Matschke and Marc Dreimann and Schmidt, {Nils Ole} and Eicker, {Sven Oliver}",
year = "2016",
month = may,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00586-016-4381-z",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "1349--54",
journal = "EUR SPINE J",
issn = "0940-6719",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does usage of a parachute in contrast to free fall prevent major trauma? a prospective randomised-controlled trial in rag dolls

AU - Czorlich, Patrick

AU - Burkhardt, Till

AU - Buhk, Jan Hendrik

AU - Matschke, Jakob

AU - Dreimann, Marc

AU - Schmidt, Nils Ole

AU - Eicker, Sven Oliver

PY - 2016/5/1

Y1 - 2016/5/1

N2 - PURPOSE: It is undisputed for more than 200 years that the use of a parachute prevents major trauma when falling from a great height. Nevertheless up to date no prospective randomised controlled trial has proven the superiority in preventing trauma when falling from a great height instead of a free fall. The aim of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to prove the effectiveness of a parachute when falling from great height.METHODS: In this prospective randomised-controlled trial a commercially acquirable rag doll was prepared for the purposes of the study design as in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki, the participation of human beings in this trial was impossible. Twenty-five falls were performed with a parachute compatible to the height and weight of the doll. In the control group, another 25 falls were realised without a parachute. The main outcome measures were the rate of head injury; cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic fractures; and pneumothoraxes, hepatic, spleen, and bladder injuries in the control and parachute groups. An interdisciplinary team consisting of a specialised trauma surgeon, two neurosurgeons, and a coroner examined the rag doll for injuries. Additionally, whole-body computed tomography scans were performed to identify the injuries.RESULTS: All 50 falls-25 with the use of a parachute, 25 without a parachute-were successfully performed. Head injuries (right hemisphere p = 0.008, left hemisphere p = 0.004), cervical trauma (p < 0.001), thoracic trauma (p < 0.001), lumbar trauma (p < 0.001), pelvic trauma (p < 0.001), and hepatic, spleen, and bladder injures (p < 0.001) occurred more often in the control group. Only the pneumothoraxes showed no statistically significant difference between the control and parachute groups.CONCLUSIONS: A parachute is an effective tool to prevent major trauma when falling from a great height.

AB - PURPOSE: It is undisputed for more than 200 years that the use of a parachute prevents major trauma when falling from a great height. Nevertheless up to date no prospective randomised controlled trial has proven the superiority in preventing trauma when falling from a great height instead of a free fall. The aim of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to prove the effectiveness of a parachute when falling from great height.METHODS: In this prospective randomised-controlled trial a commercially acquirable rag doll was prepared for the purposes of the study design as in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki, the participation of human beings in this trial was impossible. Twenty-five falls were performed with a parachute compatible to the height and weight of the doll. In the control group, another 25 falls were realised without a parachute. The main outcome measures were the rate of head injury; cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and pelvic fractures; and pneumothoraxes, hepatic, spleen, and bladder injuries in the control and parachute groups. An interdisciplinary team consisting of a specialised trauma surgeon, two neurosurgeons, and a coroner examined the rag doll for injuries. Additionally, whole-body computed tomography scans were performed to identify the injuries.RESULTS: All 50 falls-25 with the use of a parachute, 25 without a parachute-were successfully performed. Head injuries (right hemisphere p = 0.008, left hemisphere p = 0.004), cervical trauma (p < 0.001), thoracic trauma (p < 0.001), lumbar trauma (p < 0.001), pelvic trauma (p < 0.001), and hepatic, spleen, and bladder injures (p < 0.001) occurred more often in the control group. Only the pneumothoraxes showed no statistically significant difference between the control and parachute groups.CONCLUSIONS: A parachute is an effective tool to prevent major trauma when falling from a great height.

U2 - 10.1007/s00586-016-4381-z

DO - 10.1007/s00586-016-4381-z

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 26769034

VL - 25

SP - 1349

EP - 1354

JO - EUR SPINE J

JF - EUR SPINE J

SN - 0940-6719

IS - 5

ER -