Research ExplorerPublicationsDoes placement of one-piece zirconia implants influence cres...

Does placement of one-piece zirconia implants influence crestal bone loss? Retrospective evaluation 1 year after prosthetic loading

Standard

Does placement of one-piece zirconia implants influence crestal bone loss? Retrospective evaluation 1 year after prosthetic loading. / Alkhouri, Sleman; Smeets, Ralf; Stolzer, Carolin; Burg, Simon; Volz, Karl Ulrich; Gosau, Martin; Henningsen, Anders.

In: INT J ORAL IMPL, Vol. 16, No. 1, 02.03.2023, p. 43-51.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Alkhouri, S, Smeets, R, Stolzer, C, Burg, S, Volz, KU, Gosau, M & Henningsen, A 2023, 'Does placement of one-piece zirconia implants influence crestal bone loss? Retrospective evaluation 1 year after prosthetic loading', INT J ORAL IMPL, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 43-51.

APA

Alkhouri, S., Smeets, R., Stolzer, C., Burg, S., Volz, K. U., Gosau, M., & Henningsen, A. (2023). Does placement of one-piece zirconia implants influence crestal bone loss? Retrospective evaluation 1 year after prosthetic loading. INT J ORAL IMPL, 16(1), 43-51.

Vancouver

Alkhouri S, Smeets R, Stolzer C, Burg S, Volz KU, Gosau M et al. Does placement of one-piece zirconia implants influence crestal bone loss? Retrospective evaluation 1 year after prosthetic loading. INT J ORAL IMPL. 2023 Mar 2;16(1):43-51.

Bibtex

@article{ccad8a9254404cb2b1f6eb4996c540d7,
title = "Does placement of one-piece zirconia implants influence crestal bone loss? Retrospective evaluation 1 year after prosthetic loading",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of immediate and delayed zirconia implant placement on crestal bone loss and the clinical outcomes achieved with this approach 1 year after prosthetic loading. Further objectives were to evaluate the influence of age, sex, smoking, implant dimensions, platelet-rich fibrin application and location of the implants in the jawbone on the crestal bone level.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and radiographic analysis were performed to evaluate the success rates for both groups. The data were analysed statistically through a linear regression analysis.RESULTS: No significant difference was found between immediate and delayed implant placement concerning the amount of crestal bone loss. Sex, age, bone augmentation, diabetes and prosthetic complications did not have a statistically significant influence; only smoking had a negative and statistically significant influence on crestal bone loss (P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Immediate or delayed placement of one-piece zirconia implants may be a good alternative to the use of titanium implants concerning success and survival.",
keywords = "Humans, Retrospective Studies, Dental Implants/adverse effects, Smoking, Bone Diseases, Metabolic",
author = "Sleman Alkhouri and Ralf Smeets and Carolin Stolzer and Simon Burg and Volz, {Karl Ulrich} and Martin Gosau and Anders Henningsen",
year = "2023",
month = mar,
day = "2",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "43--51",
journal = "INT J ORAL IMPL",
issn = "2631-6420",
publisher = "Quintessence Publishing Company",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does placement of one-piece zirconia implants influence crestal bone loss? Retrospective evaluation 1 year after prosthetic loading

AU - Alkhouri, Sleman

AU - Smeets, Ralf

AU - Stolzer, Carolin

AU - Burg, Simon

AU - Volz, Karl Ulrich

AU - Gosau, Martin

AU - Henningsen, Anders

PY - 2023/3/2

Y1 - 2023/3/2

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of immediate and delayed zirconia implant placement on crestal bone loss and the clinical outcomes achieved with this approach 1 year after prosthetic loading. Further objectives were to evaluate the influence of age, sex, smoking, implant dimensions, platelet-rich fibrin application and location of the implants in the jawbone on the crestal bone level.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and radiographic analysis were performed to evaluate the success rates for both groups. The data were analysed statistically through a linear regression analysis.RESULTS: No significant difference was found between immediate and delayed implant placement concerning the amount of crestal bone loss. Sex, age, bone augmentation, diabetes and prosthetic complications did not have a statistically significant influence; only smoking had a negative and statistically significant influence on crestal bone loss (P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Immediate or delayed placement of one-piece zirconia implants may be a good alternative to the use of titanium implants concerning success and survival.

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of immediate and delayed zirconia implant placement on crestal bone loss and the clinical outcomes achieved with this approach 1 year after prosthetic loading. Further objectives were to evaluate the influence of age, sex, smoking, implant dimensions, platelet-rich fibrin application and location of the implants in the jawbone on the crestal bone level.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and radiographic analysis were performed to evaluate the success rates for both groups. The data were analysed statistically through a linear regression analysis.RESULTS: No significant difference was found between immediate and delayed implant placement concerning the amount of crestal bone loss. Sex, age, bone augmentation, diabetes and prosthetic complications did not have a statistically significant influence; only smoking had a negative and statistically significant influence on crestal bone loss (P < 0.05).CONCLUSIONS: Immediate or delayed placement of one-piece zirconia implants may be a good alternative to the use of titanium implants concerning success and survival.

KW - Humans

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Dental Implants/adverse effects

KW - Smoking

KW - Bone Diseases, Metabolic

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 36861680

VL - 16

SP - 43

EP - 51

JO - INT J ORAL IMPL

JF - INT J ORAL IMPL

SN - 2631-6420

IS - 1

ER -