Discrimination of SARS-CoV-2 Infections From Other Viral Respiratory Infections by Scent Detection Dogs

  • Nele Alexandra Ten Hagen (Shared first author)
  • Friederike Twele (Shared first author)
  • Sebastian Meller
  • Paula Jendrny
  • Claudia Schulz
  • Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede
  • Ab Osterhaus
  • Hans Ebbers
  • Isabell Pink
  • Tobias Welte
  • Michael Peter Manns
  • Thomas Illig
  • Anahita Fathi
  • Marylyn Martina Addo
  • Andreas Nitsche
  • Andreas Puyskens
  • Janine Michel
  • Eva Krause
  • Rosina Ehmann
  • Albrecht von Brunn
  • Christiane Ernst
  • Katrin Zwirglmaier
  • Roman Wölfel
  • Alexandra Nau
  • Eva Philipp
  • Michael Engels
  • Esther Schalke
  • Holger Andreas Volk

Related Research units

Abstract

Background: Testing of possibly infected individuals remains cornerstone of containing the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Detection dogs could contribute to mass screening. Previous research demonstrated canines' ability to detect SARS-CoV-2-infections but has not investigated if dogs can differentiate between COVID-19 and other virus infections. Methods: Twelve dogs were trained to detect SARS-CoV-2 positive samples. Three test scenarios were performed to evaluate their ability to discriminate SARS-CoV-2-infections from viral infections of a different aetiology. Naso- and oropharyngeal swab samples from individuals and samples from cell culture both infected with one of 15 viruses that may cause COVID-19-like symptoms were presented as distractors in a randomised, double-blind study. Dogs were either trained with SARS-CoV-2 positive saliva samples (test scenario I and II) or with supernatant from cell cultures (test scenario III). Results: When using swab samples from individuals infected with viruses other than SARS-CoV-2 as distractors (test scenario I), dogs detected swab samples from SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals with a mean diagnostic sensitivity of 73.8% (95% CI: 66.0-81.7%) and a specificity of 95.1% (95% CI: 92.6-97.7%). In test scenario II and III cell culture supernatant from cells infected with SARS-CoV-2, cells infected with other coronaviruses and non-infected cells were presented. Dogs achieved mean diagnostic sensitivities of 61.2% (95% CI: 50.7-71.6%, test scenario II) and 75.8% (95% CI: 53.0-98.5%, test scenario III), respectively. The diagnostic specificities were 90.9% (95% CI: 87.3-94.6%, test scenario II) and 90.2% (95% CI: 81.1-99.4%, test scenario III), respectively. Conclusion: In all three test scenarios the mean specificities were above 90% which indicates that dogs can distinguish SARS-CoV-2-infections from other viral infections. However, compared to earlier studies our scent dogs achieved lower diagnostic sensitivities. To deploy COVID-19 detection dogs as a reliable screening method it is therefore mandatory to include a variety of samples from different viral respiratory tract infections in dog training to ensure a successful discrimination process.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
Article number749588
ISSN2296-858X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Comment Deanary

Copyright © 2021 ten Hagen, Twele, Meller, Jendrny, Schulz, von Köckritz-Blickwede, Osterhaus, Ebbers, Pink, Welte, Manns, Illig, Fathi, Addo, Nitsche, Puyskens, Michel, Krause, Ehmann, von Brunn, Ernst, Zwirglmaier, Wölfel, Nau, Philipp, Engels, Schalke and Volk.

PubMed 34869443