Differentielle Effekte von CBASP und supportiver Psychotherapie auf die therapeutische Allianz in der Behandlung chronischer Depressionen

Standard

Differentielle Effekte von CBASP und supportiver Psychotherapie auf die therapeutische Allianz in der Behandlung chronischer Depressionen. / Eich, Hannah Sophie; Kriston, Levente; Schramm, Elisabeth; Hautzinger, Martin; Stenzel, Nikola Maria; Bailer, Josef.

In: VPP - Verhaltensther Psychosoz Prax, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2021, p. 299-313.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{c3fb7e7b71894b959d4934481dc3c75d,
title = "Differentielle Effekte von CBASP und supportiver Psychotherapie auf die therapeutische Allianz in der Behandlung chronischer Depressionen",
abstract = "The founder of CBASP, James McCullough assumed that the interpersonal problems, which chronically depressed patients often experience, and which can fuel into the severity of the depression, have their roots in childhood maltreatment. These interpersonal problems also impair the relationship between patient and therapist and thereby impede effective psychotherapy. Against this background, CBASP was conceived to include an explicit focus on the therapeutic alliance, which is targeted with specific interventions. The present study examined how CBASP compared to an unspecific supportive Psychotherapy (SP) with regards to the therapeutic alliance. It was studied whether there were differential effects of these two forms of psychotherapy in patients with differing degrees of trauma. The study was part of a larger randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of CBASP versus SP. The results indicate that patients in the CBASP group rated the therapeutic alliance on the average more positively than patients receiving SP, and that these evaluations became more favorable in the course of time in both conditions. The differential effects of the respective treatment group on the increase in favorable ratings for the alliance also differed significantly between CM groups. This was primarily due to patients with high CM receiving CBASP, who correspondingly rated the improvement in the alliance higher than high CM patients receiving SP. It appears that CBASP is more effective than SP in creating a positive therapeutic alliance. Moreover, CBASP has a particularly positive effect on the increase of satisfaction with therapeutic outcome in the subgroup of patients with a history of severe CM.",
author = "Eich, {Hannah Sophie} and Levente Kriston and Elisabeth Schramm and Martin Hautzinger and Stenzel, {Nikola Maria} and Josef Bailer",
year = "2021",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "53",
pages = "299--313",
journal = "VPP - Verhaltensther Psychosoz Prax",
issn = "0721-7234",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differentielle Effekte von CBASP und supportiver Psychotherapie auf die therapeutische Allianz in der Behandlung chronischer Depressionen

AU - Eich, Hannah Sophie

AU - Kriston, Levente

AU - Schramm, Elisabeth

AU - Hautzinger, Martin

AU - Stenzel, Nikola Maria

AU - Bailer, Josef

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The founder of CBASP, James McCullough assumed that the interpersonal problems, which chronically depressed patients often experience, and which can fuel into the severity of the depression, have their roots in childhood maltreatment. These interpersonal problems also impair the relationship between patient and therapist and thereby impede effective psychotherapy. Against this background, CBASP was conceived to include an explicit focus on the therapeutic alliance, which is targeted with specific interventions. The present study examined how CBASP compared to an unspecific supportive Psychotherapy (SP) with regards to the therapeutic alliance. It was studied whether there were differential effects of these two forms of psychotherapy in patients with differing degrees of trauma. The study was part of a larger randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of CBASP versus SP. The results indicate that patients in the CBASP group rated the therapeutic alliance on the average more positively than patients receiving SP, and that these evaluations became more favorable in the course of time in both conditions. The differential effects of the respective treatment group on the increase in favorable ratings for the alliance also differed significantly between CM groups. This was primarily due to patients with high CM receiving CBASP, who correspondingly rated the improvement in the alliance higher than high CM patients receiving SP. It appears that CBASP is more effective than SP in creating a positive therapeutic alliance. Moreover, CBASP has a particularly positive effect on the increase of satisfaction with therapeutic outcome in the subgroup of patients with a history of severe CM.

AB - The founder of CBASP, James McCullough assumed that the interpersonal problems, which chronically depressed patients often experience, and which can fuel into the severity of the depression, have their roots in childhood maltreatment. These interpersonal problems also impair the relationship between patient and therapist and thereby impede effective psychotherapy. Against this background, CBASP was conceived to include an explicit focus on the therapeutic alliance, which is targeted with specific interventions. The present study examined how CBASP compared to an unspecific supportive Psychotherapy (SP) with regards to the therapeutic alliance. It was studied whether there were differential effects of these two forms of psychotherapy in patients with differing degrees of trauma. The study was part of a larger randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of CBASP versus SP. The results indicate that patients in the CBASP group rated the therapeutic alliance on the average more positively than patients receiving SP, and that these evaluations became more favorable in the course of time in both conditions. The differential effects of the respective treatment group on the increase in favorable ratings for the alliance also differed significantly between CM groups. This was primarily due to patients with high CM receiving CBASP, who correspondingly rated the improvement in the alliance higher than high CM patients receiving SP. It appears that CBASP is more effective than SP in creating a positive therapeutic alliance. Moreover, CBASP has a particularly positive effect on the increase of satisfaction with therapeutic outcome in the subgroup of patients with a history of severe CM.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 53

SP - 299

EP - 313

JO - VPP - Verhaltensther Psychosoz Prax

JF - VPP - Verhaltensther Psychosoz Prax

SN - 0721-7234

IS - 2

ER -