Different definitions of multimorbidity and their effect on prevalence rates: a retrospective study in German general practices

Standard

Different definitions of multimorbidity and their effect on prevalence rates: a retrospective study in German general practices. / Hauswaldt, Johannes; Schmalstieg-Bahr, Katharina; Himmel, Wolfgang.

In: PRIM HEALTH CARE RES, Vol. 23, e25, 06.04.2022.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{747926bc952e4f75b55372da2dec0fe1,
title = "Different definitions of multimorbidity and their effect on prevalence rates: a retrospective study in German general practices",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity is common among general practice patients and increases a general practitioner's (GP's) workload. But the extent of multimorbidity may depend on its definition and whether a time delimiter is included in the definition or not.AIMS: The aims of the study were (1) to compare practice prevalence rates yielded by different models of multimorbidity, (2) to determine how a time delimiter influences the prevalence rates and (3) to assess the effects of multimorbidity on the number of direct and indirect patient contacts as an indicator of doctors' workload.METHODS: This retrospective observational study used electronic medical records from 142 German general practices, covering 13 years from 1994 to 2007. The four models of multimorbidity ranged from a simple definition, requiring only two diseases, to an advanced definition requiring at least three chronic conditions. We also included a time delimiter for the definition of multimorbidity. Descriptive statistics, such as means and correlation coefficients, were applied.FINDINGS: The annual percentage of multimorbid primary care patients ranged between 84% (simple model) and 16% (advanced model) and between 74% and 13% if a time delimiter was included. Multimorbid patients had about twice as many contacts annually than the remainder. The number of contacts were different for each model, but the ratio remained similar. The number of contacts correlated moderately with patient age (r = 0.35). The correlation between age and multimorbidity increased from model to model up to 0.28 while the correlations between contacts and multimorbidity varied around 0.2 in all four models.CONCLUSION: Multimorbidity seems to be less prevalent in primary care practices than usually estimated if advanced definitions of multimorbidity and a temporal delimiter are applied. Although multimorbidity increases in any model a doctor's workload, it is especially the older person with multiple chronic diseases who is a challenge for the GP.",
keywords = "Aged, Chronic Disease, Comorbidity, General Practice, Humans, Multimorbidity, Prevalence, Retrospective Studies",
author = "Johannes Hauswaldt and Katharina Schmalstieg-Bahr and Wolfgang Himmel",
year = "2022",
month = apr,
day = "6",
doi = "10.1017/S146342362200010X",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
journal = "PRIM HEALTH CARE RES",
issn = "1463-4236",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Different definitions of multimorbidity and their effect on prevalence rates: a retrospective study in German general practices

AU - Hauswaldt, Johannes

AU - Schmalstieg-Bahr, Katharina

AU - Himmel, Wolfgang

PY - 2022/4/6

Y1 - 2022/4/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity is common among general practice patients and increases a general practitioner's (GP's) workload. But the extent of multimorbidity may depend on its definition and whether a time delimiter is included in the definition or not.AIMS: The aims of the study were (1) to compare practice prevalence rates yielded by different models of multimorbidity, (2) to determine how a time delimiter influences the prevalence rates and (3) to assess the effects of multimorbidity on the number of direct and indirect patient contacts as an indicator of doctors' workload.METHODS: This retrospective observational study used electronic medical records from 142 German general practices, covering 13 years from 1994 to 2007. The four models of multimorbidity ranged from a simple definition, requiring only two diseases, to an advanced definition requiring at least three chronic conditions. We also included a time delimiter for the definition of multimorbidity. Descriptive statistics, such as means and correlation coefficients, were applied.FINDINGS: The annual percentage of multimorbid primary care patients ranged between 84% (simple model) and 16% (advanced model) and between 74% and 13% if a time delimiter was included. Multimorbid patients had about twice as many contacts annually than the remainder. The number of contacts were different for each model, but the ratio remained similar. The number of contacts correlated moderately with patient age (r = 0.35). The correlation between age and multimorbidity increased from model to model up to 0.28 while the correlations between contacts and multimorbidity varied around 0.2 in all four models.CONCLUSION: Multimorbidity seems to be less prevalent in primary care practices than usually estimated if advanced definitions of multimorbidity and a temporal delimiter are applied. Although multimorbidity increases in any model a doctor's workload, it is especially the older person with multiple chronic diseases who is a challenge for the GP.

AB - BACKGROUND: Multimorbidity is common among general practice patients and increases a general practitioner's (GP's) workload. But the extent of multimorbidity may depend on its definition and whether a time delimiter is included in the definition or not.AIMS: The aims of the study were (1) to compare practice prevalence rates yielded by different models of multimorbidity, (2) to determine how a time delimiter influences the prevalence rates and (3) to assess the effects of multimorbidity on the number of direct and indirect patient contacts as an indicator of doctors' workload.METHODS: This retrospective observational study used electronic medical records from 142 German general practices, covering 13 years from 1994 to 2007. The four models of multimorbidity ranged from a simple definition, requiring only two diseases, to an advanced definition requiring at least three chronic conditions. We also included a time delimiter for the definition of multimorbidity. Descriptive statistics, such as means and correlation coefficients, were applied.FINDINGS: The annual percentage of multimorbid primary care patients ranged between 84% (simple model) and 16% (advanced model) and between 74% and 13% if a time delimiter was included. Multimorbid patients had about twice as many contacts annually than the remainder. The number of contacts were different for each model, but the ratio remained similar. The number of contacts correlated moderately with patient age (r = 0.35). The correlation between age and multimorbidity increased from model to model up to 0.28 while the correlations between contacts and multimorbidity varied around 0.2 in all four models.CONCLUSION: Multimorbidity seems to be less prevalent in primary care practices than usually estimated if advanced definitions of multimorbidity and a temporal delimiter are applied. Although multimorbidity increases in any model a doctor's workload, it is especially the older person with multiple chronic diseases who is a challenge for the GP.

KW - Aged

KW - Chronic Disease

KW - Comorbidity

KW - General Practice

KW - Humans

KW - Multimorbidity

KW - Prevalence

KW - Retrospective Studies

U2 - 10.1017/S146342362200010X

DO - 10.1017/S146342362200010X

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 35382922

VL - 23

JO - PRIM HEALTH CARE RES

JF - PRIM HEALTH CARE RES

SN - 1463-4236

M1 - e25

ER -