Diagnostics for Pleiotropy in Mendelian Randomization Studies
Standard
Diagnostics for Pleiotropy in Mendelian Randomization Studies. / Dai, James Y; Peters, Ulrike; Wang, Xiaoyu; Kocarnik, Jonathan; Chang-Claude, Jenny; Slattery, Martha L; Chan, Andrew; Lemire, Mathieu; Berndt, Sonja I; Casey, Graham; Song, Mingyang; Jenkins, Mark A; Brenner, Hermann; Thrift, Aaron P; White, Emily; Hsu, Li.
In: AM J EPIDEMIOL, Vol. 187, No. 12, 01.12.2018, p. 2672-2680.Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostics for Pleiotropy in Mendelian Randomization Studies
AU - Dai, James Y
AU - Peters, Ulrike
AU - Wang, Xiaoyu
AU - Kocarnik, Jonathan
AU - Chang-Claude, Jenny
AU - Slattery, Martha L
AU - Chan, Andrew
AU - Lemire, Mathieu
AU - Berndt, Sonja I
AU - Casey, Graham
AU - Song, Mingyang
AU - Jenkins, Mark A
AU - Brenner, Hermann
AU - Thrift, Aaron P
AU - White, Emily
AU - Hsu, Li
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - Diagnosing pleiotropy is critical for assessing the validity of Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. The popular MR-Egger method evaluates whether there is evidence of bias-generating pleiotropy among a set of candidate genetic instrumental variables. In this article, we propose a statistical method-global and individual tests for direct effects (GLIDE)-for systematically evaluating pleiotropy among the set of genetic variants (e.g., single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) used for MR. As a global test, simulation experiments suggest that GLIDE is nearly uniformly more powerful than the MR-Egger method. As a sensitivity analysis, GLIDE is capable of detecting outliers in individual variant-level pleiotropy, in order to obtain a refined set of genetic instrumental variables. We used GLIDE to analyze both body mass index and height for associations with colorectal cancer risk in data from the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium and the Colon Cancer Family Registry (multiple studies). Among the body mass index-associated SNPs and the height-associated SNPs, several individual variants showed evidence of pleiotropy. Removal of these potentially pleiotropic SNPs resulted in attenuation of respective estimates of the causal effects. In summary, the proposed GLIDE method is useful for sensitivity analyses and improves the validity of MR.
AB - Diagnosing pleiotropy is critical for assessing the validity of Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. The popular MR-Egger method evaluates whether there is evidence of bias-generating pleiotropy among a set of candidate genetic instrumental variables. In this article, we propose a statistical method-global and individual tests for direct effects (GLIDE)-for systematically evaluating pleiotropy among the set of genetic variants (e.g., single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) used for MR. As a global test, simulation experiments suggest that GLIDE is nearly uniformly more powerful than the MR-Egger method. As a sensitivity analysis, GLIDE is capable of detecting outliers in individual variant-level pleiotropy, in order to obtain a refined set of genetic instrumental variables. We used GLIDE to analyze both body mass index and height for associations with colorectal cancer risk in data from the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium and the Colon Cancer Family Registry (multiple studies). Among the body mass index-associated SNPs and the height-associated SNPs, several individual variants showed evidence of pleiotropy. Removal of these potentially pleiotropic SNPs resulted in attenuation of respective estimates of the causal effects. In summary, the proposed GLIDE method is useful for sensitivity analyses and improves the validity of MR.
KW - Journal Article
U2 - 10.1093/aje/kwy177
DO - 10.1093/aje/kwy177
M3 - SCORING: Journal article
C2 - 30188971
VL - 187
SP - 2672
EP - 2680
JO - AM J EPIDEMIOL
JF - AM J EPIDEMIOL
SN - 0002-9262
IS - 12
ER -