Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Lymph Node Staging for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer Patients - A Multicenter, Retrospective, Observational Study

  • Maximilian Pallauf
  • David D'Andrea
  • Frederik König
  • Ekaterina Laukthina
  • Takafumi Yanagisawa
  • Morgan Rouprêt
  • Siamak Daneshmand
  • Hooman Djaladat
  • Alireza Ghoreifi
  • Francesco Soria
  • Kazutoshi Fujita
  • Stephen A Boorjian
  • Aaron M Potretzke
  • Andrea Mari
  • Mathieu Roumiguié
  • Alessandro Antonelli
  • Alberto Bianchi
  • Zine-Eddine Khene
  • John P Sfakianos
  • Marcus Jamil
  • Joost L Boormans
  • Jay D Raman
  • Nico C Grossmann
  • Alberto Breda
  • Axel Heidenreich
  • Francesco Del Giudice
  • Nirmish Singla
  • Sharokh F Shariat
  • Benjamin Pradere

Related Research units

Abstract

PURPOSE: Treatment options for the management of upper tract urothelial cancer are based on accurate staging. However, the performance of conventional cross-sectional imaging for clinical lymph node staging (N-staging) remains poorly investigated. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of conventional cross-sectional imaging for upper tract urothelial cancer N-staging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study. We included 865 nonmetastatic (M0) upper tract urothelial cancer patients treated with curative intended surgery and lymph node dissection who had been staged with conventional cross-sectional imaging before surgery. We compared clinical (c) and pathological (p) N-staging results to evaluate the concordance of node-positive (N+) and node-negative (N0) disease and calculate cN-staging's diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS: Conventional cross-sectional imaging categorized 750 patients cN0 and 115 cN+. Lymph node dissection categorized 641 patients pN0 and 224 pN+. The cN-stage was pathologically downstaged in 6.8% of patients, upstaged in 19%, and found concordant in 74%. The sensitivity and specificity of cN-staging were 25% (95% CI 20; 31) and 91% (95% CI 88; 93). Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 2.7 (95% CI 2.0; 3.8) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.76; 0.89). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.58, 95% CI 0.55; 0.61) revealed low diagnostic accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS: Conventional cross-sectional imaging had low sensitivity in detecting upper tract urothelial cancer pN+ disease. However, cN+ increased the likelihood of pN+ by almost threefold. Thus, conventional cross-sectional imaging is a rule-in but not a rule-out test. Lymph node dissection should remain the standard during extirpative upper tract urothelial cancer surgery to obtain accurate N-staging. cN+ could be a strong argument for early systemic treatment.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
ISSN0022-5347
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 03.2023
PubMed 36475808