Development and validation of the Burdens in Oral Surgery Questionnaire (BiOS-Q)

Standard

Development and validation of the Burdens in Oral Surgery Questionnaire (BiOS-Q). / Reissmann, D R; Semmusch, J; Farhan, Daniel; Smeets, R; Heiland, M; Heydecke, G.

In: J ORAL REHABIL, Vol. 40, No. 10, 01.10.2013, p. 780-7.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{8010b01f5e0446d5a0c91f80e89f8b5e,
title = "Development and validation of the Burdens in Oral Surgery Questionnaire (BiOS-Q)",
abstract = "Patients' perspective is increasingly re-cognised as an important outcome measure in oral surgery. However, how patients perceive the surgical treatment cannot be assessed currently. This would be an important indicator for process-related quality of care. It was the aim to develop and to validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-based measures of process-related quality of care in oral surgery. The new Burdens in Oral Surgery Questionnaire (BiOS-Q) was developed in two steps in patients undergoing oral surgery. First, an item pool was created using semi-structured interviews in 90 patients. Second, a preliminary version was applied in 297 consecutively recruited patients to assess redundancy, completion rates, face validity, difficulty and distribution. Psychometric properties of the final version of the questionnaire were evaluated. The BiOS-Q consists of 16 items and showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0·84) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0·90). The questionnaire's mean score was significantly correlated with dentists' burdens (r = 0·44) and patients' overall satisfaction (r = 0·39) indicating sufficient validity. The BiOS-Q is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of patient-based process-related quality of care in oral surgery.",
keywords = "Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Patient Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Surgery, Oral, Young Adult",
author = "Reissmann, {D R} and J Semmusch and Daniel Farhan and R Smeets and M Heiland and G Heydecke",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2013",
month = oct,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/joor.12092",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "780--7",
journal = "J ORAL REHABIL",
issn = "0305-182X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and validation of the Burdens in Oral Surgery Questionnaire (BiOS-Q)

AU - Reissmann, D R

AU - Semmusch, J

AU - Farhan, Daniel

AU - Smeets, R

AU - Heiland, M

AU - Heydecke, G

N1 - © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - Patients' perspective is increasingly re-cognised as an important outcome measure in oral surgery. However, how patients perceive the surgical treatment cannot be assessed currently. This would be an important indicator for process-related quality of care. It was the aim to develop and to validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-based measures of process-related quality of care in oral surgery. The new Burdens in Oral Surgery Questionnaire (BiOS-Q) was developed in two steps in patients undergoing oral surgery. First, an item pool was created using semi-structured interviews in 90 patients. Second, a preliminary version was applied in 297 consecutively recruited patients to assess redundancy, completion rates, face validity, difficulty and distribution. Psychometric properties of the final version of the questionnaire were evaluated. The BiOS-Q consists of 16 items and showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0·84) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0·90). The questionnaire's mean score was significantly correlated with dentists' burdens (r = 0·44) and patients' overall satisfaction (r = 0·39) indicating sufficient validity. The BiOS-Q is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of patient-based process-related quality of care in oral surgery.

AB - Patients' perspective is increasingly re-cognised as an important outcome measure in oral surgery. However, how patients perceive the surgical treatment cannot be assessed currently. This would be an important indicator for process-related quality of care. It was the aim to develop and to validate an instrument for the assessment of patient-based measures of process-related quality of care in oral surgery. The new Burdens in Oral Surgery Questionnaire (BiOS-Q) was developed in two steps in patients undergoing oral surgery. First, an item pool was created using semi-structured interviews in 90 patients. Second, a preliminary version was applied in 297 consecutively recruited patients to assess redundancy, completion rates, face validity, difficulty and distribution. Psychometric properties of the final version of the questionnaire were evaluated. The BiOS-Q consists of 16 items and showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0·84) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0·90). The questionnaire's mean score was significantly correlated with dentists' burdens (r = 0·44) and patients' overall satisfaction (r = 0·39) indicating sufficient validity. The BiOS-Q is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of patient-based process-related quality of care in oral surgery.

KW - Adolescent

KW - Adult

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Patient Satisfaction

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Quality of Life

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Reproducibility of Results

KW - Surgery, Oral

KW - Young Adult

U2 - 10.1111/joor.12092

DO - 10.1111/joor.12092

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 24033878

VL - 40

SP - 780

EP - 787

JO - J ORAL REHABIL

JF - J ORAL REHABIL

SN - 0305-182X

IS - 10

ER -