Research ExplorerPublicationsDer Fehler zweiter Art und seine Bedeutung bei der Beurteilu...

Der Fehler zweiter Art und seine Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie"

Standard

Der Fehler zweiter Art und seine Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie". / Raabe, A; Dubben, H H; Beck-Bornholdt, H P.

In: STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, Vol. 176, No. 11, 01.11.2000, p. 491-7.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Raabe, A, Dubben, HH & Beck-Bornholdt, HP 2000, 'Der Fehler zweiter Art und seine Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie"', STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, vol. 176, no. 11, pp. 491-7.

APA

Raabe, A., Dubben, H. H., & Beck-Bornholdt, H. P. (2000). Der Fehler zweiter Art und seine Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie". STRAHLENTHER ONKOL, 176(11), 491-7.

Vancouver

Raabe A, Dubben HH, Beck-Bornholdt HP. Der Fehler zweiter Art und seine Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie". STRAHLENTHER ONKOL. 2000 Nov 1;176(11):491-7.

Bibtex

@article{ec77ca0712164a8c9419c5736b91e44e,
title = "Der Fehler zweiter Art und seine Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualit{\"a}tsanalyse der Zeitschrift {"}Strahlentherapie und Onkologie{"}",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions to {"}Strahlentherapie und Onkologie{"} is assessed, aiming for improvement of the journal and consequently its impact factor.MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181 articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories {"}review{"}, {"}original contribution{"}, and {"}short communication{"} were analyzed concerning the appropriate consideration of Type II error.RESULT: Ninety-nine publications were excluded from analysis for different specified reasons. In none of the remaining 82 clinical publications Type II error was considered.CONCLUSION: Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of the journal by setting value on adequate consideration of Type II error.",
keywords = "Germany, Management Audit, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Quality Control, Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapy",
author = "A Raabe and Dubben, {H H} and Beck-Bornholdt, {H P}",
year = "2000",
month = nov,
day = "1",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "176",
pages = "491--7",
journal = "STRAHLENTHER ONKOL",
issn = "0179-7158",
publisher = "Urban und Vogel",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Der Fehler zweiter Art und seine Bedeutung bei der Beurteilung von Resultaten. Qualitätsanalyse der Zeitschrift "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie"

AU - Raabe, A

AU - Dubben, H H

AU - Beck-Bornholdt, H P

PY - 2000/11/1

Y1 - 2000/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions to "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie" is assessed, aiming for improvement of the journal and consequently its impact factor.MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181 articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories "review", "original contribution", and "short communication" were analyzed concerning the appropriate consideration of Type II error.RESULT: Ninety-nine publications were excluded from analysis for different specified reasons. In none of the remaining 82 clinical publications Type II error was considered.CONCLUSION: Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of the journal by setting value on adequate consideration of Type II error.

AB - BACKGROUND: The statistical quality of the contributions to "Strahlentherapie und Onkologie" is assessed, aiming for improvement of the journal and consequently its impact factor.MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 181 articles published during 1998 and 1999 in the categories "review", "original contribution", and "short communication" were analyzed concerning the appropriate consideration of Type II error.RESULT: Ninety-nine publications were excluded from analysis for different specified reasons. In none of the remaining 82 clinical publications Type II error was considered.CONCLUSION: Authors, peer reviewers, and editors could contribute to improve the quality of the journal by setting value on adequate consideration of Type II error.

KW - Germany

KW - Management Audit

KW - Periodicals as Topic

KW - Publishing

KW - Quality Control

KW - Radiation Oncology

KW - Radiotherapy

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

C2 - 11143522

VL - 176

SP - 491

EP - 497

JO - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

JF - STRAHLENTHER ONKOL

SN - 0179-7158

IS - 11

ER -