Cosmesis from the patient's and the doctor's view.

Standard

Cosmesis from the patient's and the doctor's view. / Hoeller, Ulrike; Kuhlmey, Antje; Bajrovic, Amira; Grader, Kai; Berger, Juergen; Tribius, Silke; Fehlauer, Fabian; Alberti, Winfried.

In: INT J RADIAT ONCOL, Vol. 57, No. 2, 2, 2003, p. 345-354.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hoeller, U, Kuhlmey, A, Bajrovic, A, Grader, K, Berger, J, Tribius, S, Fehlauer, F & Alberti, W 2003, 'Cosmesis from the patient's and the doctor's view.', INT J RADIAT ONCOL, vol. 57, no. 2, 2, pp. 345-354. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12957244?dopt=Citation>

APA

Hoeller, U., Kuhlmey, A., Bajrovic, A., Grader, K., Berger, J., Tribius, S., Fehlauer, F., & Alberti, W. (2003). Cosmesis from the patient's and the doctor's view. INT J RADIAT ONCOL, 57(2), 345-354. [2]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12957244?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Hoeller U, Kuhlmey A, Bajrovic A, Grader K, Berger J, Tribius S et al. Cosmesis from the patient's and the doctor's view. INT J RADIAT ONCOL. 2003;57(2):345-354. 2.

Bibtex

@article{c98f64f5dab2422bbd24181949ca38d0,
title = "Cosmesis from the patient's and the doctor's view.",
abstract = "PURPOSE: Long-term cosmesis from the patient's perspective is compared to the doctor's appraisal. Factors that determine judgment of cosmesis are analyzed. Also, a patient questionnaire was designed to screen for normal tissue reactions and is evaluated. METHODS AND PATIENTS: With structured questions, patients rated their satisfaction considering cosmesis, the difference in overall appearance, and specific changes of the breast. Two doctors rated cosmesis and radiation late effects (LENT/SOMA). Ratings were compared, and the relative impact of single items was studied. Two hundred eighty-seven patients with unilateral breast carcinoma were examined after a median follow-up of 8 years. They were treated between 1981 and 1995 with lumpectomy and radiotherapy of the breast with 1.8-2.5 Gy fractions with a median total dose of 55 Gy (range: 50-65 Gy). RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one patients rated cosmesis as satisfying, 73 patients rated it as acceptable, and 25 patients as poor. Eighty-nine patients noted severe changes of appearance. Severe firmness and extensive scars were the most frequent complaint; the most important single item for judging cosmesis as poor was highly visible scars. Generally, doctors rated cosmesis less favorably (satisfactory, 150 patients; poor, 43 patients). Severe fibrosis was more important than discoloration of the breast or scars. Correlation between patients' and doctors' rating of cosmesis was modest (Cohen's weighted kappa 0.29), whereas the doctor's rating correlated well (0.55). Specificity and sensitivity of the questionnaire item for severe fibrosis (using doctors' judgments as gold standard) was 0.8; Cohen's weighted kappa was 0.34 (95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.48). CONCLUSION: Rating of cosmesis is subjective. Patients' satisfaction with cosmesis is greater than the doctors' and is determined not only by radiation late effects, but also by factors unrelated to the appearance of the breast. Severe fibrosis may be detected by a patient questionnaire.",
author = "Ulrike Hoeller and Antje Kuhlmey and Amira Bajrovic and Kai Grader and Juergen Berger and Silke Tribius and Fabian Fehlauer and Winfried Alberti",
year = "2003",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "57",
pages = "345--354",
journal = "INT J RADIAT ONCOL",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Cosmesis from the patient's and the doctor's view.

AU - Hoeller, Ulrike

AU - Kuhlmey, Antje

AU - Bajrovic, Amira

AU - Grader, Kai

AU - Berger, Juergen

AU - Tribius, Silke

AU - Fehlauer, Fabian

AU - Alberti, Winfried

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - PURPOSE: Long-term cosmesis from the patient's perspective is compared to the doctor's appraisal. Factors that determine judgment of cosmesis are analyzed. Also, a patient questionnaire was designed to screen for normal tissue reactions and is evaluated. METHODS AND PATIENTS: With structured questions, patients rated their satisfaction considering cosmesis, the difference in overall appearance, and specific changes of the breast. Two doctors rated cosmesis and radiation late effects (LENT/SOMA). Ratings were compared, and the relative impact of single items was studied. Two hundred eighty-seven patients with unilateral breast carcinoma were examined after a median follow-up of 8 years. They were treated between 1981 and 1995 with lumpectomy and radiotherapy of the breast with 1.8-2.5 Gy fractions with a median total dose of 55 Gy (range: 50-65 Gy). RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one patients rated cosmesis as satisfying, 73 patients rated it as acceptable, and 25 patients as poor. Eighty-nine patients noted severe changes of appearance. Severe firmness and extensive scars were the most frequent complaint; the most important single item for judging cosmesis as poor was highly visible scars. Generally, doctors rated cosmesis less favorably (satisfactory, 150 patients; poor, 43 patients). Severe fibrosis was more important than discoloration of the breast or scars. Correlation between patients' and doctors' rating of cosmesis was modest (Cohen's weighted kappa 0.29), whereas the doctor's rating correlated well (0.55). Specificity and sensitivity of the questionnaire item for severe fibrosis (using doctors' judgments as gold standard) was 0.8; Cohen's weighted kappa was 0.34 (95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.48). CONCLUSION: Rating of cosmesis is subjective. Patients' satisfaction with cosmesis is greater than the doctors' and is determined not only by radiation late effects, but also by factors unrelated to the appearance of the breast. Severe fibrosis may be detected by a patient questionnaire.

AB - PURPOSE: Long-term cosmesis from the patient's perspective is compared to the doctor's appraisal. Factors that determine judgment of cosmesis are analyzed. Also, a patient questionnaire was designed to screen for normal tissue reactions and is evaluated. METHODS AND PATIENTS: With structured questions, patients rated their satisfaction considering cosmesis, the difference in overall appearance, and specific changes of the breast. Two doctors rated cosmesis and radiation late effects (LENT/SOMA). Ratings were compared, and the relative impact of single items was studied. Two hundred eighty-seven patients with unilateral breast carcinoma were examined after a median follow-up of 8 years. They were treated between 1981 and 1995 with lumpectomy and radiotherapy of the breast with 1.8-2.5 Gy fractions with a median total dose of 55 Gy (range: 50-65 Gy). RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one patients rated cosmesis as satisfying, 73 patients rated it as acceptable, and 25 patients as poor. Eighty-nine patients noted severe changes of appearance. Severe firmness and extensive scars were the most frequent complaint; the most important single item for judging cosmesis as poor was highly visible scars. Generally, doctors rated cosmesis less favorably (satisfactory, 150 patients; poor, 43 patients). Severe fibrosis was more important than discoloration of the breast or scars. Correlation between patients' and doctors' rating of cosmesis was modest (Cohen's weighted kappa 0.29), whereas the doctor's rating correlated well (0.55). Specificity and sensitivity of the questionnaire item for severe fibrosis (using doctors' judgments as gold standard) was 0.8; Cohen's weighted kappa was 0.34 (95% confidence interval: 0.21-0.48). CONCLUSION: Rating of cosmesis is subjective. Patients' satisfaction with cosmesis is greater than the doctors' and is determined not only by radiation late effects, but also by factors unrelated to the appearance of the breast. Severe fibrosis may be detected by a patient questionnaire.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 57

SP - 345

EP - 354

JO - INT J RADIAT ONCOL

JF - INT J RADIAT ONCOL

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 2

M1 - 2

ER -