Research ExplorerPublications[Conventional X-rays and conventional tomography in orthopae...

[Conventional X-rays and conventional tomography in orthopaedics. Current status].

Standard

[Conventional X-rays and conventional tomography in orthopaedics. Current status]. / Steinhagen, J; Petersen, J P; Rüther, Wolfgang.

In: ORTHOPADE, Vol. 35, No. 6, 6, 2006, p. 605-615.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journal › SCORING: Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Steinhagen, J, Petersen, JP & Rüther, W 2006, '[Conventional X-rays and conventional tomography in orthopaedics. Current status].', ORTHOPADE, vol. 35, no. 6, 6, pp. 605-615. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16555049?dopt=Citation>

APA

Steinhagen, J., Petersen, J. P., & Rüther, W. (2006). [Conventional X-rays and conventional tomography in orthopaedics. Current status]. ORTHOPADE, 35(6), 605-615. [6]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16555049?dopt=Citation

Vancouver

Steinhagen J, Petersen JP, Rüther W. [Conventional X-rays and conventional tomography in orthopaedics. Current status]. ORTHOPADE. 2006;35(6):605-615. 6.

Bibtex

@article{29abb682fcfb4402bfb2d7ab9ff2239d,
title = "[Conventional X-rays and conventional tomography in orthopaedics. Current status].",
abstract = "Although sonography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common tools in radiology, conventional X-rays still have a place in orthopaedic diagnostic investigation. The advantages of radiographic imaging are high local resolution concerning bone, economy of time besides relatively low costs and worldwide experience. The conventional X-ray is indispensable for planning surgical procedures and clinical monitoring. For several pathological processes an X-ray is sufficient for diagnosis and therapy (i.e. degeneration, fracture). Early changes of the bone (i.e. osteonecrosis) cannot be detected by X-ray. CT and MRI have closed the diagnostic gap. Indications for conventional tomography are rare.",
author = "J Steinhagen and Petersen, {J P} and Wolfgang R{\"u}ther",
year = "2006",
language = "Deutsch",
volume = "35",
pages = "605--615",
journal = "ORTHOPADE",
issn = "0085-4530",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - [Conventional X-rays and conventional tomography in orthopaedics. Current status].

AU - Steinhagen, J

AU - Petersen, J P

AU - Rüther, Wolfgang

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Although sonography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common tools in radiology, conventional X-rays still have a place in orthopaedic diagnostic investigation. The advantages of radiographic imaging are high local resolution concerning bone, economy of time besides relatively low costs and worldwide experience. The conventional X-ray is indispensable for planning surgical procedures and clinical monitoring. For several pathological processes an X-ray is sufficient for diagnosis and therapy (i.e. degeneration, fracture). Early changes of the bone (i.e. osteonecrosis) cannot be detected by X-ray. CT and MRI have closed the diagnostic gap. Indications for conventional tomography are rare.

AB - Although sonography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common tools in radiology, conventional X-rays still have a place in orthopaedic diagnostic investigation. The advantages of radiographic imaging are high local resolution concerning bone, economy of time besides relatively low costs and worldwide experience. The conventional X-ray is indispensable for planning surgical procedures and clinical monitoring. For several pathological processes an X-ray is sufficient for diagnosis and therapy (i.e. degeneration, fracture). Early changes of the bone (i.e. osteonecrosis) cannot be detected by X-ray. CT and MRI have closed the diagnostic gap. Indications for conventional tomography are rare.

M3 - SCORING: Zeitschriftenaufsatz

VL - 35

SP - 605

EP - 615

JO - ORTHOPADE

JF - ORTHOPADE

SN - 0085-4530

IS - 6

M1 - 6

ER -