Confirmatory factor analysis of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5) based on DSM-5 vs. ICD-11 criteria

  • Antje Krüger-Gottschalk
  • Thomas Ehring
  • Christine Knaevelsrud
  • Anne Dyer
  • Ingo Schäfer
  • Julia Schellong
  • Heinrich Rau
  • Kai Köhler

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many studies have investigated the latent structure of the DSM-5 criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, most research on this topic was based on self-report data. We aimed to investigate the latent structure of PTSD based on a clinical interview, the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-5).

METHOD: A clinical sample of 345 participants took part in this multi-centre study. Participants were assessed with the CAPS-5 and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL-5). We evaluated eight competing models of DSM-5 PTSD symptoms and three competing models of ICD-11 PTSD symptoms.

RESULTS: The internal consistency of the CAPS-5 was replicated. In CFAs, the Anhedonia model emerged as the best fitting model within all tested DSM-5 models. However, when compared with the Anhedonia model, the non-nested ICD-11 model as a less complex three-factor solution showed better model fit indices.

DISCUSSION: We discuss the findings in the context of earlier empirical findings as well as theoretical models of PTSD.

Bibliographical data

Original languageEnglish
Article number2010995
ISSN2000-8198
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Comment Deanary

© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PubMed 35070160