Comparison of morbidity-related parameters between autologous and allogeneic bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation from patients' perspective-A questionnaire-based cohort study

Standard

Comparison of morbidity-related parameters between autologous and allogeneic bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation from patients' perspective-A questionnaire-based cohort study. / Heimes, Diana; Pabst, Andreas; Becker, Philipp; Hartmann, Amely; Kloss, Frank; Tunkel, Jochen; Smeets, Ralf; Kämmerer, Peer W.

In: CLIN IMPLANT DENT R, Vol. 26, No. 1, 02.2024, p. 170-182.

Research output: SCORING: Contribution to journalSCORING: Journal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Bibtex

@article{b651b4aec70b410b9d19496e31179e2e,
title = "Comparison of morbidity-related parameters between autologous and allogeneic bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation from patients' perspective-A questionnaire-based cohort study",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Alveolar ridge augmentation is often required before dental implant placement. In this context, autologous bone grafts are considered the biological gold standard. Still, bone block harvesting is accompanied by some serious potential disadvantages and possible complications, such as pain, bleeding, and nerve irritation. Several studies aimed to compare autologous to allogeneic bone grafts concerning bone quality and implant survival rates; this is the first prospective study analyzing and comparing morbidity-related parameters after alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous and allogeneic bone blocks from patients' perspective.METHODS: Using a questionnaire, 36 patients were asked to evaluate the surgery as well as the post-operative period concerning pain, stress, sensibility deficits, satisfaction with, and consequences from the surgery as well as the preferred procedure for future alveolar ridge augmentations.RESULTS: No significant differences were shown regarding stress and pain during and after surgery, whereas the rate of nerve irritations was twice as high in the autologous group. The swelling was significantly higher in patients with autologous bone blocks (p = 0.001). Nevertheless, the overall satisfaction of patients of both groups was very high, with over 8/10 points.CONCLUSIONS: The swelling was the main reason for patients' discomfort in both groups and was significantly higher after autologous bone augmentation. Since this side effect seems to be a highly relevant factor for patients' comfort and satisfaction, it needs to be discussed during preoperative consultation to allow shared decision-making considering the anticipated morbidity.",
keywords = "Humans, Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/adverse effects, Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods, Cohort Studies, Prospective Studies, Bone Transplantation/methods, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Pain",
author = "Diana Heimes and Andreas Pabst and Philipp Becker and Amely Hartmann and Frank Kloss and Jochen Tunkel and Ralf Smeets and K{\"a}mmerer, {Peer W}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.",
year = "2024",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1111/cid.13242",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "170--182",
journal = "CLIN IMPLANT DENT R",
issn = "1523-0899",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of morbidity-related parameters between autologous and allogeneic bone grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation from patients' perspective-A questionnaire-based cohort study

AU - Heimes, Diana

AU - Pabst, Andreas

AU - Becker, Philipp

AU - Hartmann, Amely

AU - Kloss, Frank

AU - Tunkel, Jochen

AU - Smeets, Ralf

AU - Kämmerer, Peer W

N1 - © 2023 The Authors. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

PY - 2024/2

Y1 - 2024/2

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Alveolar ridge augmentation is often required before dental implant placement. In this context, autologous bone grafts are considered the biological gold standard. Still, bone block harvesting is accompanied by some serious potential disadvantages and possible complications, such as pain, bleeding, and nerve irritation. Several studies aimed to compare autologous to allogeneic bone grafts concerning bone quality and implant survival rates; this is the first prospective study analyzing and comparing morbidity-related parameters after alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous and allogeneic bone blocks from patients' perspective.METHODS: Using a questionnaire, 36 patients were asked to evaluate the surgery as well as the post-operative period concerning pain, stress, sensibility deficits, satisfaction with, and consequences from the surgery as well as the preferred procedure for future alveolar ridge augmentations.RESULTS: No significant differences were shown regarding stress and pain during and after surgery, whereas the rate of nerve irritations was twice as high in the autologous group. The swelling was significantly higher in patients with autologous bone blocks (p = 0.001). Nevertheless, the overall satisfaction of patients of both groups was very high, with over 8/10 points.CONCLUSIONS: The swelling was the main reason for patients' discomfort in both groups and was significantly higher after autologous bone augmentation. Since this side effect seems to be a highly relevant factor for patients' comfort and satisfaction, it needs to be discussed during preoperative consultation to allow shared decision-making considering the anticipated morbidity.

AB - INTRODUCTION: Alveolar ridge augmentation is often required before dental implant placement. In this context, autologous bone grafts are considered the biological gold standard. Still, bone block harvesting is accompanied by some serious potential disadvantages and possible complications, such as pain, bleeding, and nerve irritation. Several studies aimed to compare autologous to allogeneic bone grafts concerning bone quality and implant survival rates; this is the first prospective study analyzing and comparing morbidity-related parameters after alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous and allogeneic bone blocks from patients' perspective.METHODS: Using a questionnaire, 36 patients were asked to evaluate the surgery as well as the post-operative period concerning pain, stress, sensibility deficits, satisfaction with, and consequences from the surgery as well as the preferred procedure for future alveolar ridge augmentations.RESULTS: No significant differences were shown regarding stress and pain during and after surgery, whereas the rate of nerve irritations was twice as high in the autologous group. The swelling was significantly higher in patients with autologous bone blocks (p = 0.001). Nevertheless, the overall satisfaction of patients of both groups was very high, with over 8/10 points.CONCLUSIONS: The swelling was the main reason for patients' discomfort in both groups and was significantly higher after autologous bone augmentation. Since this side effect seems to be a highly relevant factor for patients' comfort and satisfaction, it needs to be discussed during preoperative consultation to allow shared decision-making considering the anticipated morbidity.

KW - Humans

KW - Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/adverse effects

KW - Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Prospective Studies

KW - Bone Transplantation/methods

KW - Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

KW - Pain

U2 - 10.1111/cid.13242

DO - 10.1111/cid.13242

M3 - SCORING: Journal article

C2 - 37438839

VL - 26

SP - 170

EP - 182

JO - CLIN IMPLANT DENT R

JF - CLIN IMPLANT DENT R

SN - 1523-0899

IS - 1

ER -